The United Nations’ Secret Agenda:Globalization and the Elimination of America’s Sovereignty

Globalization relates to social change and the connectivity of societies around the world. The goal of globalization is to create one global village that has mutual understanding and friendship between all citizens of the world community. The signs of globalization are many. Some major ones are:

1. “Increase in international trade at a faster rate than the growth in the world economy 2. Greater international cultural exchange 3. Greater international travel and tourism 4. Greater immigration, including illegal immigration 5. Development of global telecommunications infrastructure 6. Development of global financial systems 7. Increase in the share of the world economy controlled by multinational corporations 8. Increase in the number of standards applied globally 9. Increased role of international organizations 10. Erosion of national sovereignty and national borders” (1)

As evidenced by these signs of globalism, it is dominant in the world today. However, all the elements of globalism are not good for the United States and the world, especially the issue of national sovereignty. The erosion of national sovereignty and national borders is the main hidden objective in the United Nations’ drive for global governance. Therefore, the United States’ government and all its citizens must become aware of the evils that are lurking throughout the halls of the United Nations.

In order to achieve its global agenda, the United Nations must divide the world into specific regions. The United Nations’ charter includes this goal in Chapters 8-11. It describes the organization of the world as “regional arrangements and intergovernmental agreements.” Presently, those leaders of the world who endorse the creation of a socialist-controlled global community have divided the world into 85 regions. By dividing the world into specific regions, it would be make it much easier to police. The United States is using this same principle, too. It is being used to create regions for coordinating all levels of government activities. In 1969, President Richard Nixon was responsible for dividing the United States into 10 regions which would be controlled by government bureaucrats. Eventually, the type organization could be responsible for the United States becoming a member of the new world community that will be controlled by the United Nations. (2)

The United Nations has many other policies that would usurp power from the United States government and the rights and privileges of its citizens. First, the United Nations has already gained control over many of America’s parks and historical sites. The UN is also attempting to gain control of America’s river systems. Secondly, it wants to decide for women if they can have babies and how many. Thirdly, the United Nations wants to dictate the economic and judicial structure for each nation in the world. Fourthly, they want to make the citizens of the United States fund the United Nations by a permanent tax. Lastly, the United Nations wants American military men who serve as part of its army to pledge allegiance to it instead of the United States of America. (2) Therefore, based on these United Nations’ policies, it is obvious that the UN is definitely not the international peace keeping organization that it claims to be. It is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Its clandestine agenda is to incorporate all nations of the world into one megalopolis with socialism as its governmental base. If the United Nations achieves their false agenda, the United States will no longer be a free nation.

How does the United Nations propose to usurp American sovereignty and create a global community? The blueprint for the United Nations’ plan to create a global community is called Agenda 21. Its purpose is to create societies that can sustain themselves. Leaders from all aspects of life have readily accepted the UN’s vision of transforming the earth into a planet that has social justice for all and a sound environment. However, the astronomical cost of establishing this new earth has been overlooked by the supporters of Agenda 21. But, according to these supporters, the end justifies the mean. This is the reason the supporters of Agenda 21 are supposedly trying to save many of our resources for future generations. If they could limit the amount of goods consumed and reduce the level of energy used, they would preserve the earth’s resources for many years to come. Also, these United Nations supporters would like to reduce the amount of poverty in the world by creating a global welfare system. Ultimately, the United Nations proposes to meet all the needs of the inhabitants of the earth by incorporating a socialistic utopia. But, socialism actually contradicts the main vision and leads to more poverty and distrust in the world. (8)

Agenda 21 is a binding contractual agreement between 179 nations that was signed in 1992 at the United Nations’ Conference on Environment and Development. The Conference was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. If Agenda 21 is put into operation, the United Nations would achieve its ultimate goal which is to rule the world. The UN would dictate to all lands and people where they will live, what they will eat, what they will learn, and how they will communicate. The United Nations would even determine how much water and electricity could be allocated for use in the world along with specifying the types of transportation that would be permitted. (8)

The United Nations’ Conference on Environment and Development is responsible for developing the United Nations’ environmental policy procedures. The nameless, undemocratic procedures basically create policies that are written by enemies of America and the rest of the world. The procedures used by UNCED evoke four types of power. These four powers which are utilized are non-governmental organizations, national governments, international governments, and the ultra powerful philanthropic institutions. (3) One of the specific requirements of Agenda 21 is to formulate a local Agenda 21 plan. The goal is to develop a contingency plan to sustain life in the local community. Representatives from the different departments of the local government would be responsible for the development of this plan. They should “construct, operate and maintain economic, social and environmental infra- structure, oversee planning processes, establish local environmental policies and regulations, and assist in implementing national and sub-national environmental policies.” (13) Also, these government officials “should enter into a dialogue with its citizens, local organizations and private enterprises and adopt a local Agenda 21. Through consultation and consensus-building, local authorities would learn from citizens and from local, civic, community, business and industrial organizations and acquire the information needed for formulating the best strategies." (13) However, an underlying meaning of all this emergency preparedness for sustaining of life in the future is to prepare America and the world for a socialistic global state. Local communities would become the pieces of the global governance puzzle that is being established by the United Nations. The ultimate goal of the United Nations is to have all power and control every aspect of life. Many non-governmental organizations are assisting the United Nations in its ongoing effort to conquer the world. They are endeavoring to make new policies that would give the UN more control of more property. These policies are then introduced by several United Nations’ organizations at regional and world conferences. After the policies are adopted, they are sent to national governments to ratify. Once the policies are ratified, they become binding international agreements that dictate that the nations abide by international laws. (3) How does the United Nations assure that these newly signed agreements are obeyed? In order to assure that these international laws are followed, non-governmental organizations force the nations involved to cooperate or they will be sued. Also, these same organizations attempt to gain as much public support for their agendas as possible. The media and public schools are used to promote this evil environmental agenda before elected representatives and the general public. As a result, many people are up in arms over a contaminated global environment. In fact, many of America’s leaders are joining the bandwagon to give more power to the United Nations. Also, many Americans are now willing to sacrifice their property rights and the sovereignty of their nation for the benefit of eliminating environmental problems in the world. (3)

It is never wise for a nation to give up its authority to another governmental entity. However, in the name of environmental matters, the United States has given in to the wishes of the United Nations. Basically, the United Nations has indirectly taken control of much of America’s sovereignty. It has secretly usurped power through the many environmental treaties that the United States has signed. As a result of these treaties, many non-Americans are making key decisions about America’s economy and free market system and its sovereignty. This is totally unethical and un-American. America’s forefathers are probably rolling over in their graves. It is impossible to believe that such a powerful and wealthy nation would allow this to happen. (6)

3. DeWeece, Tom. “UN’s Dirty Little Secret” American Policy Center. 10 September 2005.

6. Chumley, Cheryl K. “UN Seek New Environmental Treaty” Capitalism Magazine. 11 September 2005.

13. Strong, Maurice. “Santa Cruz County: Local Agenda 21 Introduction” Santa Cruz County. 16 September 2005.

I still think this is paranoia but don’t get me wrong...the UN is evil.

I think the perfect time to pull out would be after this Durban II conference where even Canadian multiculturalists can see it’s just racist.

I might be a lot of things, but egotistical is not one of them. What I wrote in my profile was to permit Free Republic readers know my background and why I write from the viewpoint that I write. Also, I understand that all people will not agree with what I write, but, as a true American, I should have the right to express my opinion without being personally attacked. My purpose in writing is to expose things that I personally believe most Americans do not know about. Since Free Republic is a conservative site, my writings are an attempt to expose the liberal agenda that I feel would destroy the foundational principles established by the Founding Fathers of our great nation.

I might be a lot of things, but egotistical is not one of them.

Your profile page speaks louder than your disclaimer, sir.

What I wrote in my profile was to permit Free Republic readers know my background and why I write from the viewpoint that I write.

Both points could easily be accomplished without referring to yourself in the third person.

Also, I understand that all people will not agree with what I write, but, as a true American, I should have the right to express my opinion without being personally attacked.

I never said that I disagree with one word you said, newbie, but your assertion of a non-existant "right" not to be attacked begs the question of just what Constitution you're reading that in.

My purpose in writing is to expose things that I personally believe most Americans do not know about. Since Free Republic is a conservative site, my writings are an attempt to expose the liberal agenda that I feel would destroy the foundational principles established by the Founding Fathers of our great nation.

All admirable aims, which I have said nothing about, sir. You're a teacher, pay closer attention.

LOL, nobody takes it serious even though it is our right. But the fact that even many on our side consider this an absurd idea demonstrates IMO just how far left we really are. Cant say it isn't our own fault either. From W Wilson on its been one giant leap to eventual tyranny. I have to give the Commie bastards their due they have very long term goals and are willing to take it bit by bit generation by generation.

FWIW ... I could not agree more.

Our "long term goals" have been reduced to going to the mall and watching American Idol, while the Marxist-Socialist Commies (in and out of our country) never stop in their plan to reduce our "great experiment" to the ash heap of history.

On the brighter side ... I do think there may be a wake up call, and that others (like Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, etc.etc. will come forward and bring us back to reality. In fact he /they may have already been born and are already being groomed for their role.

I wish us well.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.