Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Is Rush Limbaugh, And Why Is He Manipulating the GOP Vote?
American Daily ^ | 1/29/08 | Carol Devine-Molin

Posted on 01/29/2008 9:00:54 AM PST by GOPBlonde

Election 2008 piece by Carol Devine-Molin For years I’ve been a fan of talk radio personality Rush Limbaugh, the “harmless lovable fuzzball”, and I’ve always enjoyed his humor and commentary. But recently, something has changed. He’s crossed a line. Limbaugh is now actively manipulating the Republican electorate in ways that are unacceptable for an entertainer, or even a self-styled ideologue and opinion shaper.

Rush regularly underscores that he’s a “movement conservative”, not a Republican partisan. That’s fine. But then he has the chutzpa to engage in heavy-handed tactics that are meant to skew the outcome of the GOP election process. Sometimes I feel like he’s morphing into a right-wing propaganda minister of the air-waves as he mercilessly beats on some candidates, and gives others (that he likes) a free ride. Rush is on a strange power-trip. As both a proud Reaganite Republican and conservative who operated at the grassroots, I really take umbrage with what he’s doing. The Republican Party is my party and the party of millions of other rank-and-file who love the GOP. Who the heck is Rush Limbaugh? This is a guy who probably didn’t even cast his first vote until he was thirty-five. Bombastic Limbaugh has even taken recent potshots at Republican stalwart Newt Gingrich. It’s time for El Rushbo to chill out.

True, Rush Limbaugh is among the most influential conservative voices on the political scene today. That makes it all the more disconcerting that Limbaugh is being patently irresponsible by spewing over-the-top rhetoric that could very well depress the Republican vote in the general election and thereby help elect a Democrat become the next president of this great nation. This is not a matter of free speech; Of course, the conservative poobah can make any public pronouncements that he wishes. But, by the same token, words have meaning and impact, and given the high stakes in this election, it’s difficult to see how Limbaugh is being properly circumspect. Yes, Rush, it’s your right to say anything you want, and it’s my prerogative to register my deep displeasure.

I’m in the awkward position of having to defend John McCain and Mike Huckabee against Rush Limbaugh’s rants, despite the fact that I will not be voting for either of these contenders in the primaries. That being said – even if it means crawling over broken glass or walking on a fire-bed of hot embers – I will do whatever it takes to pull that lever in the general election for the Republican candidate, whoever that might be. Why? Because the safety of this nation is paramount, and any of the Republican presidential hopefuls would do a better job as commander-in-chief during these perilous times than the Democrats in the offing. Moreover, the last thing that America needs is a bunch of blatant Nanny-state socialists expanding government and exerting further control over the citizenry.

Limbaugh recently stated: “What I said was that I, for the first time on this program, I can see possibly not voting for the Republican nominee.” On another occasion, Limbaugh was even more vociferous, as he espoused: “I’m here to tell you if either of these two guys [John McCain or Mike Huckabee] gets the nomination, it’s going to destroy the Republican Party, it’s going to change it forever, be the end of it. A lot of people aren’t going to vote. You watch.”

Well, what happens if either McCain or Huckabee survives Limbaugh’s onslaught and becomes the GOP candidate? That’s a distinct possibility for McCain, who is polling well and battling with Mitt Romney for the numero uno spot. Rush holds sway among conservative Republicans, and if he persists in his attacks against McCain, some conservatives will refuse to vote Republican in the general election if McCain is on the ballot.

As to the assertion that McCain or Huckabee will destroy the Republican Party if nominated, that’s sheer poppycock. Let’s face it; the GOP is already in flagrant disarray due to the policies of President George Bush who broke with conservative orthodoxy, and by extension, his party base. Upon his departure from office, conservative Republicans will look to reclaim the party. If Senator McCain intends to win the GOP primaries and the general election, he can only prevail by burnishing his conservative credentials and developing a special bond with the conservative grassroots. He may or may not be capable of accomplishing these things. In any vent, there’s a legitimate process in place that will vet McCain. Then let the chips fall where they may. Conservatives are smart people – They don’t need a crazed Limbaugh to repeatedly beat-up on McCain or any other GOP presidential aspirant.

Sadly, Chief Wagawaga El Rushbo of the El Conservo Tribe is being both supercilious and short-sighted as he leads the pack against McCain and Huckabee. For Limbaugh, these two contenders must be quashed at all costs, utilizing his talk show power-pulpit to inflict devastating attacks. Limbaugh’s stridency begs the question: At this juncture, who is really having a deleterious effect upon the Republican Party? Limbaugh is acting like a petulant child, desperately attempting to get his way, even if it means overstepping his bounds and inflicting nasty targeted assaults upon GOP hopefuls.

Let me be clear: During this primary season, we should welcome debate and challenge the contenders on their ideas and records. However, it’s not necessary to go in for the jugular as Limbaugh is doing – He’s engaging in over-kill. That being said, really vicious assaults and infighting at the primary level don’t serve Republicans well. Why provide the Democrats with further ammunition to assail an already bloodied GOP candidate in the general election?

In the past, Limbaugh adroitly tapped into the fact that most Americans desperately wanted to attain victory in Iraq. Likewise, he should easily grasp that Republicans are extremely jazzed about the prospect of persevering against Hillary Clinton, the probable Democrat nominee. So the simple message to Rush is don’t unduly damage any of our GOP hopefuls. Let the primary process run its course.

However, there’s salient interference in the works from other quarters. It’s rather intriguing that the master political strategist himself, Bill Clinton, is out-and-about the media emphasizing that John McCain and Hillary Clinton are “good friends”. That, in concert with the recent New York Times endorsement of John McCain, appears calculated to impart the “kiss of death” on McCain, so that the Republican base will run tearing at their hair and screaming. Clearly, the Clintons and their liberal surrogates deem McCain a significant threat and they’re scheming to eject him from the political race. Ironically, despite Limbaugh’s efforts to harpoon McCain’s candidacy, it might be the finessing by the Clintons that does McCain in.

And, please, I’m not buying El Rushbo’s bogus claim that there isn’t a whit of difference between McCain and Hillary or Huckabee and Hillary. It’s Rush’s contention that they’re all the same. If either McCain or Huckabee become the GOP candidate, Rush would rather let the next presidency play out under the “Democrat’s watch”. He stated: “I think it would be easier to do that [advance a conservative agenda] with a Democrat president, given our choices here if it’s McCain or Huckabee.” This has been a rude awakening for me: Rush is no friend of the Republican Party. How dare he try to assiduously manipulate the GOP vote! And what has happened to his judgment!

For heaven’s sake, how could conservatives, in good conscience, accede to another Clinton presidency and place our Armed Forces in the hands of Leftists such as Hillary and Bill Clinton, who never properly respected the military and, in fact, hollowed it out and reduced its forces by half the last time they were in control of the White House! Rush, think about this clearly: You don’t care that our fine members of the military would again be used and abused by the Clintons? Moreover, the Clinton administration profoundly failed to address the growing problem of Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda during the 1990s, which essentially unleashed the global terror war. Without question, America requires a leader that honors our military, and is fully prepared to fight Islamo-fascism. It doesn’t take a genius to figure this out: Any of the GOP contenders would make a better commander-in-chief, than Hillary or Obama.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; elections; limbaugh; moonbatcolumnist; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-284 next last
To: ctdonath2

Democrats played a huge part in the Reagan landslide. We should have turned them away as they were “unpure” votes.


161 posted on 01/29/2008 10:22:46 AM PST by listenhillary (A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: GOPBlonde

Seems the elites don’t much like hearing the truth about their precious McCain


162 posted on 01/29/2008 10:23:47 AM PST by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
As I posted on another thread, I wonder what Duncan (DNC chair) and his buddies are saying. “Conservative voters will never let Hilary or Obama get elected. Don’t worry, they’ll vote for our RINO.”

Exactly. These people need a severe reality adjustment.

163 posted on 01/29/2008 10:24:27 AM PST by null and void (Conservatism. It's the new Black...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy; ejonesie22
Thanks for writing this. This has really been bothering me lately to the point where I haven’t been listening to him.

Too bad Rush didn't show as much favoritism to Fred as he has to Mitt, and endorsed him when it would have really counted....then we may not have had to choose between "worse and worser". Rush has lost me as a fan.

164 posted on 01/29/2008 10:24:29 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Salvation is NOT a value-added enterprise by making you pay for it. Christ gives it away free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

I still look pretty darn good. Years of taking care of myself. Yeah, I have lots of hair.


165 posted on 01/29/2008 10:24:32 AM PST by GOPBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
>>Rush is an intellectual lightweight who regurgitates the ideas of other more original conservatives. He covers this lack of originality with his trademark bombastic behavior.

This describes Hannity for me. But Rush's originality changed talk radio, regardless of whether you recognize it or not.

Rush is an original when it comes to entertainment.

Political thought? Not so much.

166 posted on 01/29/2008 10:25:19 AM PST by Dr._Joseph_Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
Classic seminar caller.

That is exactly where I stopped reading and exactly my thought.

167 posted on 01/29/2008 10:25:28 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

When did Rush endorse Mitt Romney?


168 posted on 01/29/2008 10:25:41 AM PST by listenhillary (A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: GOPBlonde
The bottom line is that no matter who is on the ticket in November, I’m voting GOP> Stop being mesmerized by talk radio. Think for yourselves.

That's exactly what we ARE doing. You'd rather we be mesmerized by the Republican party and do whatever they tell us, whether it's amnesty, massive spending, or voting for a liberal with an R next to their names.

BTW, I never considered Rush as influencing anyone. I think he expresses the views of those that listen to him (and in the beginning had NOBODY to do that except Rush). He took a lot of flack for backing the GOP in the 2006 elections - well deserved, IMO. I don't think he influenced anyone to turn lib because of that - I think he lost a lot of listeners and had a lot of callers calling him on it. Now, he's back to expressing real conservative views.
169 posted on 01/29/2008 10:25:42 AM PST by CottonBall (The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. (Henry David Thoreau, "Walden", 1854 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GOPBlonde

Rush can’t “manipulate the Republican electorate”. These authors can’t grasp the fact that Republicans think for themselves. The libs can only understand the sheeple mentality. If Jesse tells blacks to vote for someone, they will. If CNN implies/reports that one candidate is better than another, the mouth-breathing libs listening will choose that person. They don’t know how to think, and they assume the GOP is the same.


170 posted on 01/29/2008 10:26:16 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPBlonde

Blah, Blah, Blah...

Face it, McCain is mentally unstable.


171 posted on 01/29/2008 10:26:30 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

Republicans need to stop running Democrats for office.

To better answer your question, we need to know why primary voters choose Romney/McCain over the others. I’m not sure the real reason has much to do with actual principles.


172 posted on 01/29/2008 10:29:14 AM PST by ctdonath2 (GWB wept for those who suffer. HRC wept for herself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: GOPBlonde
Good grief, I can't believe I read the whole thing! What utter drivel.

The huckster and mclame don't deserve my vote just because I vote republican whenever possible.

They both stink to high heaven.There are many republicans for whom I WILL NOT vote.

NO ONE has to tell me that. I have smell-o-vision.

Rush has NO influence on my opinion of them. I doubt that there are many who listen to Rush that look to him for "marching orders".

173 posted on 01/29/2008 10:29:23 AM PST by mombonn (God is looking for spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

Sorry Pal but Limbaugh hasn’t had twenty million listeners since the mid- to late ‘90s. His audience tops out at 13.50+ according to the Spring, 2007 Arbitron book.

Get your facts straight.


174 posted on 01/29/2008 10:29:47 AM PST by RugbyKing (Try by day, score by night)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: GOPBlonde

>>Well, what happens if either McCain or Huckabee survives Limbaugh’s onslaught and becomes the GOP candidate?

They simply do without my vote.

No RINO support from me.


175 posted on 01/29/2008 10:29:53 AM PST by Joe Bfstplk (Pure drivel drives away ordinary drivel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

I realize that the Hucksters and McCainiacs hate Rush (And apparently Sen. McCain has a dislike for conservatives generally, for that matter)

But what I’m sensing is that this is a concerted effort to manipulate FR by operatives of the McCain PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN ITSELF, not simply like-minded posters, by flooding FR with these types of articles...


176 posted on 01/29/2008 10:30:24 AM PST by larlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: GOPBlonde

I am so happy for you. Actually, I don’t give a rat’s ass if you like Rush or not.

You could have just been honest that you wrote this piece and called it a vanity.

If people aren’t happy with our gaggle of liberal Republican’s, that has very little to do with Rush.

We have spent months around here going over the records of these people. That coupled with what we all know about them ourselves.

It is insulting to accuse others of not thinking for themselves. You were attempting to do exactly what you accuse Limbaugh of.


177 posted on 01/29/2008 10:30:24 AM PST by dforest (Don't even ask me to vote for McCain, Rudy, or Huckster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Dr._Joseph_Warren

I would guess that Rush is responsible for opening the eyes of several million people the we now can count on for solid conservative voters.

Nah! Rush is a lightweight and just an entertainer, nothing more. (/sarcasm)


178 posted on 01/29/2008 10:30:30 AM PST by listenhillary (A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: larlaw

Count on it, but don’t worry, most of us know McCain is a sows ear.


179 posted on 01/29/2008 10:31:40 AM PST by dforest (Don't even ask me to vote for McCain, Rudy, or Huckster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Why aren’t Republicans running for office?


180 posted on 01/29/2008 10:32:03 AM PST by listenhillary (A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-284 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson