[nikos1121]

If it was a terrorist attack why didn’t they take claim of it?

[Safetgiver]

If it was a terrorist attack why didn’t they take claim of it?
... Maybe they did, how would we know?

[Straight Vermonter]

If it was a terrorist attack why didn’t they take claim of it?

AQ did not claim 9/11 for years (the Arabs blamed it on the Jews).

It used to be a signature of AQ not to claim their attacks.

[GBA]

Why didn't someone or group take claim? That's a good question and I don't know nor do I know that they didn't through private channels. Too much speculation for me to know or guess at an answer. What I have are memories of numerous opinions from airline pilots and mechanics I know as I was working in the industry at the time who all said they didn't believe the "official" explanation of a spark from frayed center tank wiring. Missile or bomb is what each of them attributed the cause to.

That a/c was an older design B747 and newer models don't use that wiring, but there are enough of that model, plus other aircraft with similarly designed wiring, that were it a problem, Flt 800 would more likely been one of many rather than the most famous example.

I'm from Phoenix and the summer temps there get way hotter than almost any other airport. If vaporized fuel and a low voltage spark from a poorly designed wiring were a problem, I've always thought that statistically it would have happened more often, even to well maintained American carriers or to the various cargo a/c.

My experiences watching Clinton tell the most outrageous lies, as well as the numerous stories of the Clinton Crime family's heavy handed tactics only add to my disbelief for the official CIA/FBI/NTSB story. "No controlling legal authority", all the missed chances to take out ObL, the many Janet Reno examples such as Waco, Ellian Gonzales, etc., etc., etc.,...so many examples we know of. How many more we don't?