Bill will be "dead on arrival", but the message about where this country is going becomes more and more clear. Nice image of the text of the bill available at the link.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: mmichaels1970
So much for equal protection.
2 posted on
02/01/2008 1:01:17 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: mmichaels1970
Mississippi is a nanny state on steroids. Ironic since its suposed to be a very “Republican” state. Over 60% of their counties are dry.
3 posted on
02/01/2008 1:01:21 PM PST by
Augustinian monk
(Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin - Romans 4:8)
To: mmichaels1970
“Brainchild” of Republicans....the world has gone mad.
4 posted on
02/01/2008 1:02:10 PM PST by
Mygirlsmom
(One of my fears is McCain will lose in Nov. The other is that he will WIN)
To: mmichaels1970
Scrappleface just keeps getting funnier and fun....wait, this is real?! WTF?! Welcome to the nanny state!
To: mmichaels1970
Why do I get the feeling the rats are behind this bill...
9 posted on
02/01/2008 1:03:07 PM PST by
chaos_5
(The Republic is doomed!)
To: mmichaels1970
Mississippi Pols Seek To Ban Fats At first I read that as "Fan Bats" and wondered how the environmental extremists had managed to get so far in Mississippi. ;)
10 posted on
02/01/2008 1:03:17 PM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: mmichaels1970
Notice how the MSM has to mention the sponsors are Republican in the very first paragraph!
To: mmichaels1970
I guess Haley Barbour is gonna have to go to his momma’s house for chicken and dumplings.
12 posted on
02/01/2008 1:04:03 PM PST by
RoadKingSE
(How do you know that that light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash?)
To: mmichaels1970; Eric Blair 2084
>>Republicans W. T. Mayhall, Jr. and John Read,
LOL! That’s what I like, bipartisan nannyness.
And some will claim that Repubs are different! What a crock.
This violates not only basic discrimination laws(it’d be OK if they were smokers, since they have no rights) , but, if you assume fatties are handicapped, then the ADA as well.
I love it.
13 posted on
02/01/2008 1:04:17 PM PST by
swarthyguy
(Osama Freedom Day: 2686 or so since September 11 2001!)
To: mmichaels1970
Mississippi Pols Seek To Ban Fats
Both of them?
14 posted on
02/01/2008 1:04:20 PM PST by
COBOL2Java
(Senator McCain is a great American, a lousy senator and a terrible Republican.)
To: mmichaels1970
A lot of fat people are diabetic. Suppose they are going into insulin shock and walk into a restaurant to get something to bring their blood sugar up. I was once married to a diabetic. That kind of stuff happens more than you think. Not infrequently, we had to stop to get something to eat because of blood sugar issues.
To: mmichaels1970
Well that would free up the all buffet bars at the “all you can eat” establishments.
17 posted on
02/01/2008 1:04:45 PM PST by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: mmichaels1970
While the bill is certainly DOA, I can see future legislation somewhere to crack the door open to such a thing. It will start with sliding tax based on the fat content of foods. It will then go to banning fat people from buying certain foods. And it will progress from there.
And it will all be because of socialized medicine.
18 posted on
02/01/2008 1:05:49 PM PST by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: mmichaels1970
So any fat folk who travel to Mississippi and stay in a hotel-motel will have to pack a lunch?
19 posted on
02/01/2008 1:07:01 PM PST by
Jim Hill
To: mmichaels1970
Let’s just call it “The 21st Century Dark Ages”. Global Warming, PC crapola, etc.
24 posted on
02/01/2008 1:08:36 PM PST by
Digger
(If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
To: Gabz; Eric Blair 2084
27 posted on
02/01/2008 1:10:18 PM PST by
darkangel82
(And the band played on....)
To: mmichaels1970
It looks suspciously like an attempt to re-introduce a degree of racial segregation. Even if the bill should pass, the feds surely would block it.
29 posted on
02/01/2008 1:10:33 PM PST by
Hawthorn
To: mmichaels1970
“Republicans W. T. Mayhall, Jr. and John Read, and Democrat Bobby Shows”
not republicans, just rinos
32 posted on
02/01/2008 1:11:17 PM PST by
Wuli
To: Gabz
-here’s a nanny state ping for ya.
33 posted on
02/01/2008 1:11:17 PM PST by
tioga
(Beware: conservative with back to the wall. Proceed with extreme caution.)
To: mmichaels1970
They are going about it all wrong!
All they need to do is regulate the width of all the entrance doors to the restaurants and narrow them down to the desired size and that would do the job.
They could even put up a sign like "You must be at least this skinny to enter".
But I would think these "heavy" eaters would be among a restaurant's best customers. I would be drawn to a restaurant that advertised "All the fat people eat here"....and there's something about a skinny chef that makes me suspicious.
34 posted on
02/01/2008 1:12:08 PM PST by
capt. norm
(Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson