[perfect_rovian_storm]

MittWit explanations never contain any actual explanations. All they can do is call you names and screech about the source of the article.

They’ll claim they’ve ‘answered this 100 times’, but never have addressed the substance of the argument once.

Now, one of their higher-ups will respond to me or to you with an 800 word gibberish post that says everything and nothing at the same time.

Slick Willard is a joke and it’s an insult to conservatives that anyone is trying to pass him off as the conservative standard bearer. So, now the mantra is ‘So, you’d prefer McCain?’ I don’t know which I would prefer. Neither is anywhere close to acceptable and both will surely lose the general.

So, IMHO, if we’re going to get beaten in November, I’d like to see this new ‘coup’ of liberal governors and pseudo-Republicans like McCain get beaten straight up in the general, than see a phony, pandering joke like Romney validating their BS by losing ‘as a conservative’.

[tortdog]

It really does get old when yu have to reanswer the sme argument over and over again. You start to wonder why an honest seeker of truth can’t investigate the facts and realize that the answer is there and the charged are biased attacks ingnoring contrary evidence.

I expect this from the Bush haters. But from conservatives? I had always figured that they were more reasonable with the facts (explaining the rejection of liberalism).

Oh well.

[EternalVigilance]

Now, one of their higher-ups will respond to me or to you with an 800 word gibberish post that says everything and nothing at the same time.

Man, you got 'em down cold.