Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Antietam National Battlefield: Are clouds in site's future
Herald Mail ^ | March 15, 2008

Posted on 03/24/2008 6:48:59 AM PDT by stainlessbanner

SHARPSBURG - Antietam National Battlefield is one of the 10 most endangered battlefields in the United States, according to a list released Wednesday by the Civil War Preservation Trust (CWPT).

The battlefield is "threatened with a 120-foot-tall cellular tower that would be visible from all of the battlefield's most famous vantage points," according to a CWPT press release.

Monocacy National Battlefield near Frederick, Md., also is on the list, which also includes sites in several states from Virginia to Oklahoma.

National Park Service officials were notified in December 2007 of a proposal to erect a stealth cell tower south of the battlefield off Mondale Road in Sharpsburg, park Superintendent John Howard said Thursday.

In January, park officials participated in a visibility test, and the tower would be visible in about 70 percent of the park, Howard said. The officials were asked to provide feedback to a consultant, and Howard said he wrote that the tower would be a "major intrusion into the battlefield viewshed."

"Any modern intrusion on it really detracts," Howard said.

The "stealth telecommunications structure" would look like a silo tower, said Michael Hofe, president of Liberty Towers, which is exploring the possibility of erecting such a structure in the greater Sharpsburg area.

Hofe, a Washington County native, said visitors to the battlefield might be able to see about 30 feet of the 120-foot tower above the tree line.

"They would see the top of a farm silo," Hofe said.

The Civil War Preservation Trust publishes its list of endangered battlefields annually.

"One of the most effective tools in our arsenal is public awareness," said Jim Campi, a spokesman for the organization.

The tower would "cast quite a shadow on other parts of the battlefield," he said.

Campi called the possible tower the "most egregious" cellular tower proposal the CWPT has encountered.

The tower would be in a location that is zoned appropriately, Hofe said. Several communications companies are interested in the tower, he said.

Two traditional cellular towers already are visible from the battlefield - one between Sharpsburg and Keedysville and the other south of Boonsboro, Hofe said.

Three other sites in the Tri-State area were named to a list of 15 "at-risk" battlefields. Those sites are South Mountain State Battlefield, Hoke's Run near Falling Waters, W.Va., and a battlefield in Shepherdstown, W.Va.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Maryland; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: 18620913; antietam; antietamisdoomed; battlefield; civil; cwpt; dixie; doomage; greatestpresident; preservation; sharpsburg; thecivilwar; wearedoomed

1 posted on 03/24/2008 6:49:00 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

So disguise the cell tower as a tree, already!


2 posted on 03/24/2008 6:51:37 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
The problem is that the Antietam battlefield is just a few miles from Interstate 70, and the cellular companies are so hungry for those roaming travel minutes they will do almost anything to get those highway towers up.

It would be more costly to set up multiple shorter repeaters that would not be visible from that distance - but every single tower site means a separate zoning fight.

3 posted on 03/24/2008 6:55:54 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

(weary sigh) Damn, I am so sick of fighting this stuff. But you gotta do what you gotta do. (The battle-weary OTTB mare girds her loins and gets ready for more hearings and meetings.)


4 posted on 03/24/2008 7:01:44 AM PDT by ottbmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
The Coast Guard has a training center at Yorktown VA once a Navy refueling depot. The training center actually sits on ground where the battle of Yorktown was fought. Outside the training center there was a golf course. The golf course was turned into a park commemorating the battle of Yorktown. Some houses were moved, some demolished and earth works and trenches were dug to create a battlefield. The Coast Guard is prohibited from building anything over three stories high as it might be seen from the “battlefield”.
5 posted on 03/24/2008 7:02:31 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

It doesn’t matter, our youth know so little and care so little about history that in a few decades there will be nobody to defend the battlefields and other historic places. Sorry to be such a downer, but that’s how I see it. I’m only 38, but I’ve already seen an erosion of historical knowledge and curiosity in my lifetime.


6 posted on 03/24/2008 7:11:09 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Or a flag-pole. We have 2 in our little town already...and they’re really pretty nice...I think the stealth-tree-cell towers are pretty ugly, but that may just be me.


7 posted on 03/24/2008 7:12:43 AM PDT by trappedinnj (Missing Something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

A sad note. My great-grandfather fought there with the 12th Corps in the Cornfield.


8 posted on 03/24/2008 7:22:21 AM PDT by Reo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty
Yeah, it's pretty bad. The preservation folks are typically a bit older and the youth today probably can't name the states involved in the "unpleasantries" much less the battlefields.

Toss in the eminent domain ruling in Kelo and we've got a mess.

9 posted on 03/24/2008 7:36:39 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

cell tower as tree

10 posted on 03/24/2008 7:41:30 AM PDT by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reo

Hallowed ground.


11 posted on 03/24/2008 7:42:09 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
So disguise the cell tower as a tree, already!

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

It's been done and they are virtually invisible. You know as well as I that the agenda of the anti-tower cult is to block any development of this technology.

12 posted on 03/24/2008 7:45:01 AM PDT by RoadKingSE (How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; ...
A cellular tower? On adjacent property??? We're doooooooooooooooooooooooooomed!

The officials were asked to provide feedback to a consultant, and Howard said he wrote that the tower would be a "major intrusion into the battlefield viewshed."

These people are awful.

Maryland "Freak State" PING!

13 posted on 03/24/2008 1:55:52 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Go buy Cloverfield when it comes out. No frickin' politics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson