Posted on 04/26/2008 4:46:35 AM PDT by freerepublic_or_die
Manipulative. Shameful. Race-baiting. Those are the only words to describe a new television ad from the Republican Party running in North Carolina that attacks Senator Barack Obama as
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
BUWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Where are these people when the Dems run ads accusing Repubs of burning churches, etc?
Sure, sure, that's Obama. But what about the ad?
It's Obama who is divisive. I've never seen such an "Us" vs "Them" candidate before. Yet the media pushes him as a uniter and attacks all Republicans as divisive.
The ad is simply truthful. That's why the NYT and the rest of the Left hates it.
NYT. Ignore. Next story.
Is it racism to think that Obama has an overly developed fantasy life and power lust? Is it racism to think Jeremiah Wright is the black version of white trash?
The left has it’s panties in a twist and they can’t get ‘em undone.
The ad campaign will be free with all of the attention it is getting nationally.
Good work, NC GOP!
New York Times. That says it all.
Manipulative. Shameful. Race-baiting. Those are the only words to describe a new television ad from the Republican Party
Oh Boohoohoo! The NYT is going completely nuts over this tame and truthful. They can't even write whole sentences and have to throw one-word insults around. FUNNY!!!
I am loving this.
tame and truthful ad.
The slimes are racist!!
Do not pull this ad for any reason....the slimes are a bunch of bigoted racist scum.
A Shameful, Ugly newspaper should recognize a shameful, ugly ad.
so....they played audio of something the Rev. actually said - and it was the extreme God “da*&” America.
And then they called it extreme - which it was.
How is this race baiting?
Telling the truth is now race baiting?
This particular ad didn’t mention race - or the Rev. Wright’s extreme racist remarks about whites, jews, and even Jesus.
What a stupid and bigoted statement.
Are they implying that the ad would not be bigotry if run in a Northern State?
Do they mean to imply that someone that associates with a person that hates America is okay in say Illinois but not okay in North Carolina?
Does the accusation of bigotry prevent the use of a truthful and accurate statement to be used in a political ad?
Is the implication by the media that Obama can not be attacked at all because he is black?
Wouldn't that be racist?
Basically the media is just fronting for Obama here. if this was anyone else and certainly a Republican they would never have run this ed.
America’s version of Pravda.
Yep, this ad is exactly the thing that needs to be pointed out to the mainstream; these liberal crybabies know it is extremely effective, and truthful, so they have to lie about it being racist in order to dupe people who haven’t seen it yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.