Someone needs to add Palin.
Cheers!
Posted on 09/01/2008 11:23:44 PM PDT by Chet 99
DIRTY TOOLS
As Obama operatives scour records in Alaska for dirt on Gov. Sarah Palin, they are also seeking embarrassing materials about her husband. And it isn't just the Obama campaign. Several left-wing groups with ties to MoveOn.org have used their network to offer as to $5,000 for damaging employment or personal information about him.
Meanwhile, the Obama campaign has asked the DNC to coordinate surrogates that appear on camera to attack Gov. Palin. "Last Friday, the Democrat women they put all looked old and tired, nothing like what folks were seeing from Palin," says an Obama media adviser. "It was like, 'we don't have any good-looking younger representatives to put up?'"
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Someone needs to add Palin.
Cheers!
Not anymore.
Another bad trend started by the Clintons...
Cheers!
well, it’s not as if Obama would have picked her anyway. She’s a woman.
It’s not garbage. Yesterday over on the big Palin Teenage Daughter Prgenancy thread (in Breaking News), a number of known Romneyites sanctimoniously attacked Palin and her daughter.
Enough with the Romney attacks. I have strongly opposed romney ever since I watched all the romney debate videos. I am glad he’s not the presidential nominee or VP.
but can we move on now and stop falling for this media trick to split up conservatives? The people who supported Mitt were all conservatives: Rush, Ingraham, you name it. they didn’t want Huckabee because he was too liberal on some issues even though he was more conservative on others. Now we have palin who is good on everything. That’s what we really wanted.
LMAO. Yes, at the chance of being referred to as a sexist pig (which on occasions, I will admit same) why does it appear that there are no attractive DemoRat babes who hold (or aspire to) political office?
Here's my contribution: Vermont DhimmiRat, Goobernatorial Candidate, Gay Symington.
Yes, "it" is a "she."
scum
Scum Obama used the same tactics to dig up dirt on his opponents when he ran for Senate
So ladies, what do you think about your champion?
To be moved to stab this man in the back after he left the stage leads me to believe you are a George Soros operative. This is the only rational explanation for your remarks to attempt to drag a red herring to distract voters from Obama.
I went back through Sinclair’s site for several pages and saw nothing but vague outrage over Obama and less-vague outrage over his arrest. Can you tell me what specific dirt he has got on Obama and why we should believe it? I’d be grateful for anything substantive.
We caget 16 years out of this only if the Democrats control the congress. If the Republicans control the congress and the presidency we are condemned to a more profligate government than any in the past. The economy might not survive another Republican congress. The 7 years of inflation have been to pay for a lot the debt accumulated by the Republican congress over the last 8 years. It can only get steeper if we repeat that mistake. If we get Republicans in control of the House and Senate in November we will probably have inflation double Carter’s worst and a 20 trillion budget in 4 years. I hope for McCain to win and for the House and Senate to have small Democrat majorities. In that condition the Republicans tend to be fiscally sound and rein in the Democrats’ spending.
Its funny that there actually is dirt to be dug up but good luck trying to get it out of any Alaskan!
I challenge any moveon person to approach me for something, just post it right here at FR.
In case you don't know the story...
sinclair is a career felon, a fugitive from justice (Colorado), a promiscuous queer, an identity thief, a drug dealer and more who claims that after meeting him in a Chicago bar obama bought coke and crack then they had a gay party in the back of a limo, and again a few days later in a motel. sinclair also says that obama is part of a conspiracy to murder a gay member of his church to keep him quiet.
Nice stuff, huh? He has never provided the slightest bit of proof of any kind to support his con.
There are a few freepers who have used this forum for months to promote sinclair's con. sinclair himself posted here until he was banned.
A few of us freepers tried to get this whole line thrown to the gutter, where it belongs. But for weeks the Free Republic was the only place on the web that was giving him a forum.
Because of these few freepers we really have no claim to the higher moral ground here.
How about this: Rumor has it that the governors husband was getting blow jobs from an underage fat intern in the governors office. Oh wait that's been done.
As Obama operatives scour records in Alaska for dirt on Gov. Sarah Palin, they are also seeking embarrassing materials about her husband.Okay, dems here's some dirt. But remember its double top secret info and I'll deny it if leaked ...
Her husband doesn't recycle when she's away. AND he doesn't separate 'paper from plastic' either!Again, top secret stuff, keep it quiet until October.
(I've got more stuff too, like parking by an expired parking meter. We'll save that for Nov.) 
Give it a break. I’m so tired of these mythical “romney operatives” who never are identified and in fact don’t exist.
It’s not, but don’t expect the mitt-haters here to let that stop them.
I’m just waiting for the National Enquirer interview with Bristo’s boyfriend (after he is offered $100 grand) as he describe’s Bristol’s terrible, immoral family life (made up of course...). I hope the boy is someone with some character and is able to avoid the temptation of destroying the Palin family for a few bucks...
BTW, in addition to not knowing whether the report is true or not, the report says NOTHING about the attacks on Palin;’s family and daughter.
It says that some people were critical of the Palin selection.
There’s nothing wrong with being critical of the Palin selection. There are things that can be said against it — she isn’t very experienced, she has no national media exposure so there is a risk, she is very young.
There would be no real issue with people pointing out these obvious negatives — I see them clearly even though I am happy with the Palin selection.
When I supported Romney, I said things against his candidacy. There were negatives, and they had to be dealt with.
But a discussion of people questioning the pick of a candidate last week really doesn’t belong in a thread about something completely different.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.