Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Is Media Allowing Joe Biden to Lie About Drunk Driver Killing His First Wife?
publiusforum.com ^ | 09/21/08 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 09/21/2008 6:39:19 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus

Along with the claim that Joe Biden had a "blue-collar" upbringing -- he had a decidedly upper class (though not "rich") childhood -- Joe Biden has for years claimed that his first wife and his daughter were killed by a "drunk driver" in 1972. However, closer examination of the records proves that the man driving the truck that slammed into the Biden family car was never charged with drunken driving. So, why has the media allowed this perception that Biden lost his wife to a drunk driver to persist?

As late as 2007 Biden said that the man who was involved in the fatal crash that killed his wife and daughter was a "guy who allegedly ... drank his lunch" before he got behind the wheel of his truck and in 2001 the TV show Inside Edition aired a tape of Biden saying the truck driver "stopped to drink instead of drive." Additionally, several media outlets have included the drunk driver claim in their bios of the Senator from Delaware.

This drunk driving accusation, though, is simply a Biden creation and every time this claim is uttered it pains the family of the poor, maligned man involved in the tragic accident with Biden's family, truck driver Curtis C. Dunn. Gannett owned DelewareOnline reports the anguish that Biden's continued lie causes the man's family every time it is uttered....

Read the rest at Publiusforum.com...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; bidenfamily; demlies; elections; joebiden; mediabias; obamabiden; partisanmedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
The media will let this creep get away with slandering a dead guy?
1 posted on 09/21/2008 6:39:19 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Of course. Why even bring it up?


2 posted on 09/21/2008 6:40:58 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Even for a thin-skinned solipsistic narcissist, Obama seems a frightful po-faced pill." ~Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

1) He is a dim
2) He is a ranking dim
3) He is a dim
4) He is a dim
5) He is a dim
6) He is a white dim running as VP with a black dim

LLS


3 posted on 09/21/2008 6:41:48 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except when it comes to dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

You do not have to be a rocket scientist to figure it out. It is because he is a Rat so the media lets lies slide by.


4 posted on 09/21/2008 6:45:38 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

The TRUTH and JOE BIDEN are strangers . . .


5 posted on 09/21/2008 6:45:48 AM PDT by lionheart 247365 (( S.P.E.C.I A.L.= ,,,,,,,, Sarah Palin's Executive Credentials Intimidate Angry Liberals ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Come on, let’s talk about the important issues. Like how much did Sarah Palin’s tanning bed cost.


6 posted on 09/21/2008 6:46:06 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
In the good ol’ days before FR, a Senator like this could say anything, and no one else had the power to stop him for fear of retribution. Another example of the “Kennedy Phenomenon”
7 posted on 09/21/2008 6:47:53 AM PDT by Melinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
Biden RUINED the truck driver's ability to earn a living because he kept saying the guy had been drinking when Biden KNEW that was a LIE!

Want proof?? Biden NEVER SUED!!! He could have sued the man AND his company and Biden is a LAWYER.....HE DIDN"T SUE because he wouldn't have a case!!

BIDEN IS A LIAR.

8 posted on 09/21/2008 6:48:02 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

You are being far too kind to bidenfraud.

LLS


9 posted on 09/21/2008 6:52:35 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except when it comes to dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

why must you keep asking why? the MSMholes want Obie elected. no lie, fabrication, distortion or ommission is off limits.


10 posted on 09/21/2008 6:53:11 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
This has been bothering me since I read the news article yesterday.

I am familiar with the intersection where this happened (it now has a light), and the reason that he didn't pursue it is because he knows that his wife was at fault.

For those young'uns who think 1972 was the "dark ages", yes there were toxicology tests run in those days, particularly in a fatal accident.

The state police would have investigated this accident more thoroughly than most because of who was involved.

Yes, I feel so sorry for the truck driver's family. Too bad they didn't sue Biden at the time.

Perpetrating this lie shows the true character of the vp nominee.

11 posted on 09/21/2008 6:56:41 AM PDT by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
I read about this a while ago because of the FR.

Keep beating the topic, maybe someone will “have too” report on it eventually, like with Rather's lies where they too wanted to suppress it.

12 posted on 09/21/2008 6:56:46 AM PDT by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
In 1972, no charges doesn't mean he wasn't drinking and driving. A .09 BAC would result in no charges, but one could argue he was technically, although not legally, a drunk driver.

This is one issue we could waste alot of time on and look foolish in the end.

13 posted on 09/21/2008 7:06:41 AM PDT by sonofagun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun
Please retract previous post. I should have read the entire article.

DUH!!

14 posted on 09/21/2008 7:08:36 AM PDT by sonofagun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
This is not an issue to pursue - he lost his wife and baby - not a subject to pin him on. That would appear - indeed would BE mean-spirited.

There are plenty of better (or worse) things to pin him on.

C’mon, guys. Drop this one. It will turn sour on us.

15 posted on 09/21/2008 7:24:24 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (No trees were killed in sending this message but a lot of electrons were terribly agitated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Don’t be ridiculous. The man LIED about the incident. We are not saying anything about his wife, man!


16 posted on 09/21/2008 7:26:32 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red6

The media slimes have some nerve going over Palin’s life with a fine tooth comb while letting all of Biden’s lies and other problems go. Yet I don’t doubt this is part of their strategy. Everyone knows it’s a lie but who can say anything about it? If McCain or Palin were to bring it up they would be accused of making a vicious personal attack. The Dems know they can lie and get away with it. I am just thinking how sad that the current Mrs Biden and their children go along with the big lie.

Maybe they could reach a deal though. Biden comes out and admits his lie while “reaching out” to the other side by condemning Saturday Night Live for doing a skit talking about incest in the Palin family. Like that would ever happen.


17 posted on 09/21/2008 7:27:48 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
This is not an issue to pursue - he lost his wife and baby - not a subject to pin him on. That would appear - indeed would BE mean-spirited.

This is why he is/has been allowed to lie about the circumstances time and again. The tragedy of what happened, his wife and daughter die, the young boys seriously injured, is bad enough, engenders plenty of sympathy. So why does Biden feel is necessary to impugn Dunn, imply him a drunk with the "drinks his lunch" stuff, only to have those of us who didn't know the details at the time, live outside that area, discover that the investigator found not only was there no evidence of alcohol/culpability on Dunn's part, but that in fact, the accident was caused by the late Mrs. Biden herself?

Biden is the one who should not be making an issue of this, using the tragedy after 9/11 as he did, repeating his lies during his primary. How does this help him, when it calls not only his character but his very honor into question??

18 posted on 09/21/2008 7:35:34 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Abby4116
” am familiar with the intersection where this happened (it now has a light), and the reason that he didn't pursue it is because he knows that his wife was at fault.”

I lived in Newark, DE when the accident happened. All news reports said she pulled out in front of the truck. He could not avoid hitting her.
I heard Joe Biden say the man that killed his wife and daughter drank his lunch instead of eating it.
The truck driver died, I believe last year, at about 74. He never got over the accident. According to his daughter he was tormented by memories of what happened. He was a good man.
I wish Joe Biden would get the message and stop.
Wilmington loves the Bidens and I doubt they would print anything against him.

19 posted on 09/21/2008 7:43:49 AM PDT by DaltonNC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

The police and judge involved in the case said booze wasn’t involved! Now you make this claim that “well, he could have had a .09 breathalyser”
Do you HONESTLY think that the cops wouldn’t go after a guy who had been drunk when he killed a congressman’s wife?
GET REAL


20 posted on 09/21/2008 7:48:39 AM PDT by Willie681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson