Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack Obama Denied National Security Clearance
secureputer ^ | Aug 20, 2008 | secureputer

Posted on 10/02/2008 5:51:46 PM PDT by CharlotteVRWC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
How can the President of the United States be denied a basic security clearance? How can the Commander and Chief of the most powerful military be denied access to classified information? Barack Obama would be denied the necessary security clearance for President if he was held to the same standard as everyone else.
1 posted on 10/02/2008 5:51:47 PM PDT by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

From what I understand, being POTUS is all you need to get clearance. You are CINC, nothing to qualify for. Your position itself gives you full authority.


2 posted on 10/02/2008 5:53:55 PM PDT by autumnraine (McCain/Palin 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

ping


3 posted on 10/02/2008 5:54:46 PM PDT by bonnieblue4me (You can put lipstick on a donkey (or a dimrat), but it is still an ass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ping


4 posted on 10/02/2008 5:55:05 PM PDT by porter_knorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

Interesting. a soldier can have a felony on his record not related to drugs and still get a secret security clearance. Obama must have done something really wrong to not get one. I mean, I had a top secret, SBI TK-1 while in the Army. But then again, I didn’t have any arrest record and was an all American Kid


5 posted on 10/02/2008 5:55:18 PM PDT by realcleanguy ("I have not yet begun to fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC
BWWWACKKKK Obama couldn't be cleared for rumor much less anything higher.
6 posted on 10/02/2008 5:55:18 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

To follow later.


7 posted on 10/02/2008 5:55:37 PM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

“If you can’t pass a Secret level background investigation, which is required for many soldiers, you should not be eligible for the Presidency.”

I’d support a constitutional amendment to that effect. But for now, it’s not a requirement.


8 posted on 10/02/2008 5:56:26 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC
Heard an interview from an FBI or DOD representative once. Elected officials are rarely screened for security clearance. There is no Constitutional requirement for it and the FBI's position, rightfully so, is that they cannot stand in the way of the people's choice.

Unfortunately it is up to the press to help the people vet those that run for elected office but that rarely goes both ways, as recent events have shown.

9 posted on 10/02/2008 5:56:59 PM PDT by JrsyJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

Was he actually denied or do you think he would be denied?

As far as drugs, lots of people who have done drugs have received security clearance, even top secret clearances. As long as someone is truthful about what they have done in the past, and they are no longer doing drugs, then they can usually get a clearance.

Other issues can hamper a person getting a clearance. If someone is having an affair, and they are actively lying about it to a spouse. This sets them up for blackmail.

Also, financial problems such as going bankrupt because that sets someone up for maybe wanting to sell secrets.


10 posted on 10/02/2008 5:57:12 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

If true, this is incredible!! CO


11 posted on 10/02/2008 5:57:25 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine; CharlotteVRWC
Your position itself gives you full authority.

You are correct. This same thing was bantered about in the Clinton election and there is nothing to it. Sounds good, but is nothing but a rumor.

12 posted on 10/02/2008 5:57:44 PM PDT by SLB (Wyoming's Alan Simpson on the Washington press - "all you get is controversy, crap and confusion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

He can do what Clinton did. Just say, “I tried it, but I didn’t inhale.”


13 posted on 10/02/2008 5:58:09 PM PDT by Harley (Life is Tough, But It's a Lot Tougher When You're a Liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

What would be the point of a security clearance? We already know 0bama is an an enema of the state.


14 posted on 10/02/2008 5:58:33 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Tired from wondering whether we wake up in the newest socialist country tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

Obama could not qualify for any security clearance if he had to go through the door like everyone else. I want to know why every candidate for President does not have to have a background check like they require for Top Secret. Let each candidate fill out the form that some of us had to fill out every five years to keep the clearance. If they cannot pass it, then they cannot run for office.

Remember the woman Schroeder (I Think) from CO who whined she was on Armed Services but she was not allowed to hear the black box briefings but expected to vote on the money. Good reason is that she never had the security clearance because there are certain briefings only members with the clearance can hear.


15 posted on 10/02/2008 6:00:04 PM PDT by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER -- VOTE FOR McCAIN/PALIN2008! LetsGetThisRight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy
Obama must have done something really wrong to not get one.

Obama has not been turned down for a clearance.

16 posted on 10/02/2008 6:00:45 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

When the people elect a President the clearance is a non issue period.

No clerk or bureaucrat can tell the nation that the President elect doesn’t pass his departments security requirements.


17 posted on 10/02/2008 6:01:00 PM PDT by ansel12 (The old Sarah smile. She is some girl, Sarah Barracuda. Hell, she's a natural-born world-shaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

He has ties to domestic and international terrorists, isn’t that a probelm for security clearence? IM SICk!


18 posted on 10/02/2008 6:02:14 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (THE NEW MILLIONAIRES CLUB : YOUR FRIENDLY NIEGHBORHOOD CONGRESSMEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC; LucyT; Polarik; pissant; SE Mom; Old Sarge; txradioguy; expatguy; Rokke

ping.


19 posted on 10/02/2008 6:04:00 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC; porter_knorr; Calpernia; Kevmo; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; ...

Thank you, Porter_Knorr.

Ping.


20 posted on 10/02/2008 6:05:10 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson