Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Internet Boiler Rooms

Posted on 10/30/2008 12:00:24 PM PDT by rvoitier

Psychological Warfare is afoot!


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 next last
To: rabscuttle385

True. No excuse for complaining about one poster to another. Seems rather cowardly, doesn’t it? And shouting “troll” at someone because we don’t like what they say is absurdly childish. The actual trolls, the ones that sign up and post one vanity to toss a few stink bombs and go are easily refuted and ignored. Like barking dogs, if they don’t get attention they go away.
Though FR is a conservative minded site there should be room for disagreement and the disagreeable or unpopular.
When it becomes a site where we’re reading from scripts with “acceptable” statements so as to avoid abuse I’m gone.


121 posted on 10/31/2008 8:55:19 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Please fax your Conservative Identity Papers to www.brownshirts.com/just-routine immediately.
If,IF, approved you will be give a PTOP (permission to post) but in the meantime remember...Those Google satellites can find more than just street addresses.


122 posted on 10/31/2008 9:25:43 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Have you updated your troll list? I've run into a few of these and their methods are text book Sal Lewinsky. They say a few conservative sounding things so as not to arouse suspicion as well as giving themselves cover when they are called out. They name drop Reagan or quote one or more of the Founding Fathers to make you feel as though they believe just like you do.

However, to paraphrase Adler (IIRC), I can't hear what they are saying as their actions speak too loudly. In other words, no matter what they claim about themselves or beliefs, if you buy into their posts and act accordingly, Comrade Obama wins the Presidency.

How could any conservative possibly aid the 1st and 3rd most liberal of all Senators? Anyone who helps make that happen is giving aid and comfort to the enemy and is not conservative.

Your troll list is very important, especially in this critical time when the clear and present danger of 0bama is right here, right now and must not be elected POTUS. Perhaps you should post it?

123 posted on 10/31/2008 9:41:54 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GBA; Cedric; dcwusmc; calcowgirl; fieldmarshaldj
Anyone who helps make that happen is giving aid and comfort to the enemy and is not conservative.

Your argument rests upon some questionable foundations.

First, this election is not a war, and votes are not prizes or conquests for either of the major parties. To treat the electoral process in such a way degrades and demeans the value of the individual citizen's vote.

Second, the assertion that the only choices in the presidential election are Obama and McCain, and that the individual citizen has no choice but to vote for one of the two is patently untrue. It is certainly possible that some voters are so digusted that they refuse to support either, and such a choice does not necessarily diminish or negate their beliefs in any way. What does diminish an individual voter's beliefs is the casting of a vote for a candidate or a proposal that does not line up with the voter's beliefs.

Last, McCain's peculiar habit of "crossing the aisle" to "give aid and comfort to the enemy" is well-known and well-documented. What this means is that anyone who assists McCain in doing so is, by extension, also "giving aid and comfort to the enemy." By your logic, therefore, since there are only two choices, and both choices will support Socialism, either directly, indirectly, or otherwise, it is impossible to not render "aid and comfort to the enemy."

Of course, such a statement is flagrantly false.

As for Cedric's little list, the compilation of such a list is unbecoming of a conservative and a republican. Yes, quite a few of the newbies (sign-up dates less than six months recent) are trolls, but you go through the established processes to deal with them (i.e., Viking kittens, the moderators, etc.) rather than going vigilante, especially if your discretion fails and you smear non-troll Freepers in the process.

124 posted on 10/31/2008 10:00:42 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
...Mine is 376 replies a month or about 13 posts a day ...

Dang!

I need to get a life!

125 posted on 10/31/2008 10:11:36 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
 
    +      = 

126 posted on 10/31/2008 10:14:18 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt; Cedric; calcowgirl; P-Marlowe; rabscuttle385; dcwusmc
"How about adding these to the list italianquaker calcowgirl maybe Virgina Ridgerunner"

ncalburt Since Jan 27, 2008

Well let's see. If I were a Obama troll, I'd work at completely alienating those Freepers who don't like McCain but who just maybe might hold their nose, close their eyes and vote for McCain just to keep Obama out of office -- and I'd do a special stepped-up attack on them a few days before the election to alienate them even further and assure that they would never, ever vote for McCain.

Oh, norcalburt & Cedric, you are already doing that! Good job! /sarc

127 posted on 10/31/2008 10:15:19 AM PDT by Bokababe ( http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
I repeat myself to you in case others read this. There is a time and a place for all arguments. Beating up on McCain for his immigration policies are all well and good and as a former resident of Arizona and McCain voter, I have beat him up as much as anyone. In the primary, you do what you can to get your candidate elected, but in the general election, you defeat the other side. Your first point is clearly mistaken and 0bama supposedly has spent $500,000,000 to with the prize. But you know this don't you?

You reveal yourself as an Obamatron to me in that you have not once condemned 0bama for his socialist policies, his anti-American stances, friends and supporters, his anti-America military beliefs, stances and votes, his anti-capitalism and free trade stances, his anti-2nd Amendment stance, his pro-killing the unborn, even favoring partial birth abortion stances and his desires to change the Constitution. Nope, not a word from you that I've read. Obama is a clear threat and must not be elected. You are unable to come out against him.

All you have is the same old McCain immigration policy bs over and over and over. And while I agree with you on this issue, 0bama is worse on this issue and here you are doing all you can to get people to not vote for the only other VIABLE option.

You give aid and comfort to the enemy b/c your efforts are designed to take votes away from the ONLY person capable of keeping the enemy from office: John McCain. While I agree with you that a person should vote in a way that is consistent with their beliefs, this election goes beyond personality to core foundational issues. One of two men will be POTUS and they could not be more different on all but a couple of points.

You are like a Southern Baptist who gets to vote on Satan or the Pope and decides it's better that Satan win because the Pope isn't Baptist enough for you. The thing is? I think all you have posted is posturing so as to make people think that you and others like you aren't the 0bamatrons you are. C'mon out of the closet and just be yourself. You're not fooling us.

If McCain wins, then I will resume my efforts to persuade him to change his stance on immigration. If 0bama wins, we've all lost and the borders will be wide open with no penalties for employers who hire them. But you already know that...

128 posted on 10/31/2008 10:35:14 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: GBA

Nicely said.


129 posted on 10/31/2008 10:39:00 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: GBA
In the primary, you do what you can to get your candidate elected, but in the general election, you defeat the other side.

********************

Great post, particularly the above.

130 posted on 10/31/2008 10:43:14 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: GBA; dcwusmc; calcowgirl; fieldmarshaldj
You reveal yourself as an Obamatron to me in that you have not once condemned 0bama for his socialist policies, his anti-American stances, friends and supporters, his anti-America military beliefs, stances and votes, his anti-capitalism and free trade stances, his anti-2nd Amendment stance, his pro-killing the unborn, even favoring partial birth abortion stances and his desires to change the Constitution.

So now my conservative credentials are measured by how much I condemn the pissant Marxist Obama? Sheesh. It's not particularly hard to realize that Obama is a puppet for certain forces whose agenda is Socialism and control; I couldn't support him, period.

As for McCain, there are limits to my support for Republican candidates with whom I disagree. I draw the line here.

All you have is the same old McCain immigration policy bs over and over and over.

No, actually, I've been posting about his support for bailouts, including his recent vote, and his climate change (carbon tax) plans.

You give aid and comfort to the enemy b/c your efforts are designed to take votes away from the ONLY person capable of keeping the enemy from office: John McCain.

You don't get it, do you? McCain is usually out there enabling leftists like Obama...it's called "crossing the aisle." And that isn't going to change, regardless of whether McCain wins on November 5.

Enable McCain through your votes and your donations, and by extension, you enable him to "cross the aisle" to "give comfort and aid" to leftists like Obama.

I think all you have posted is posturing so as to make people think that you and others like you aren't the 0bamatrons you are. C'mon out of the closet and just be yourself. You're not fooling us.

Wild, baseless accusations.

If this is how the Republicans are thinking, then a massive fracture in the Party's big tent is inevitable.

131 posted on 10/31/2008 10:47:59 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: GBA; rabscuttle385; dcwusmc; calcowgirl; fieldmarshaldj; pissant
their methods are text book Sal Lewinsky

Ah, yes. Old Sal Lewinsky--truly a beloved character. Born Salvatore Lucania, he changed his name to Lewinsky in the 1930s as to not be confused with the notorious gangster of the same name (Charles "Lucky" Luciano). Sal was a Fuller Brush salesman in the midwest, taking him away from his family for extended periods of time. But boy, oh boy--that man could sell anything. Mops, sweepers, cosmetics--or his personal favorite: snake oil.

RIP Sal.

P.S. In the likely event that you meant to say "Saul Alinsky," my apologies.

132 posted on 10/31/2008 10:52:15 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I apologize for any undue consternation cause you by this thread.

I know you're not a troll.

Yes, I have a list of suspect “FReepers”. However, I do not post it indiscriminately. I post it when asked to do so or when the subject is front and center.

You may disagree with my method of “outing” trolls. But, I think my reasons are sound and, thus, I will not cease until this election is (mercifully) over.

The attacks upon unsuspecting, well meaning FReepers is so virulent and pernicious I simply do not believe that the traditional, gentile, methods of dealing with them are effective.

As Rush said yesterday, it is highly likely that there are well organized (perhaps even paid) teams of underminers here and on other Conservative sites.

They prey upon sincere FReepers without remorse, destroying first their enthusiasm, then their resolve. I will not stand idly by and let them do so with impunity.

Again, I'm sorry you were dragged into this fight against your wishes.

133 posted on 10/31/2008 11:00:17 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I apologize for any undue consternation cause you by this thread.

I know you're not a troll.

Yes, I have a list of suspect “FReepers”. However, I do not post it indiscriminately. I post it when asked to do so or when the subject is front and center.

You may disagree with my method of “outing” trolls. But, I think my reasons are sound and, thus, I will not cease until this election is (mercifully) over.

The attacks upon unsuspecting, well meaning FReepers is so virulent and pernicious I simply do not believe that the traditional, gentile, methods of dealing with them are effective.

As Rush said yesterday, it is highly likely that there are well organized (perhaps even paid) teams of underminers here and on other Conservative sites.

They prey upon sincere FReepers without remorse, destroying first their enthusiasm, then their resolve. I will not stand idly by and let them do so with impunity.

Again, I'm sorry you were dragged into this fight against your wishes.

134 posted on 10/31/2008 11:01:40 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Yes, thank you very much for correcting me.


135 posted on 10/31/2008 11:04:06 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

SELAH!


136 posted on 10/31/2008 11:05:02 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: HammerOfTheDogs
If B. Hussein's goal was to dispirit us, he utterly failed. Instead, I think he's pi$$ed off the Conservative base enough that they're going to come out in droves.

I think you're right.

They've driven me to a white hot fury.

137 posted on 10/31/2008 11:17:40 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
In love and marriage, politics and elections and just about everything else, one rarely gets exactly what they want. Were this the primary, you and I would be patting each other on the back for beating up on McCain. But this isn't the primary and at the moment, John McCain is the only hope we have of keeping 0bama, someone who likely couldn't pass a security clearance, from becoming POTUS with near total access.

No matter who you hold up as more worthy, they don't have a chance of winning anything more than your vote and your vote may as well be for 0bama. Oh, I know, you didn't vote for him (so you say), but he's still POTUS. What's that tombstone say about the guy who died in the intersection when that car ran the red light? Here lies rabscuttle385. He had the right away.

I'm not saying McCain is my first choice, just that he is the only one who can keep 0bama from becoming POTUS. Our mission here is to protect country and Constitution from the greatest threat I've yet seen in my lifetime.

I like to ask myself, "What would Reagan do?" I have no doubt whatsoever that Reagan would vote for John McCain.

138 posted on 10/31/2008 11:22:10 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“openly drawing up hit lists (just like the left-wingers and Socialists do) and including established Freepers”

I know people who’ve been banned for less.


139 posted on 10/31/2008 11:23:00 AM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

Thank you for that.

FR gets its fair share of real trolls and they are outed quite quickly, IMO.

I guess I would caution you in the future to not confuse honest disagreement with troll-ness.

Argue the issues. Argue the facts. Attempting to silence dissent does nothing to win over those who do not agree with you — it probably just reinforces their convictions. Allow others the freedom to voice their opinions — otherwise you will inevitably succumb to (or become) the very enemy that most of us are fighting.


140 posted on 10/31/2008 11:38:41 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson