Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists angry after feds ax forest study (Free Air CO2 Enrichment released CO2 near trees)
Fay Observer ^ | 11/12/08 | Jeff Barnard

Posted on 11/15/2008 4:59:02 AM PST by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Libloather

Marijuana growers have been pumping increased amounts of CO2 into pot plants for years. Yeah, it increases the amount of plant material significantly.


21 posted on 11/15/2008 6:15:49 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
That plan has upset some researchers ... who want to keep the project going for at least a couple more years.
"We actually get paid to do this."

22 posted on 11/15/2008 6:16:22 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Does that mean if we start scrubbing CO2 out of the atmosphere, I don’t have to mow the lawn as much?


23 posted on 11/15/2008 6:20:58 AM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
"They have the data already. It just does not support their theories. That means keep the experiment going to see if they can somehow get the results that the want to publish (that, coincidentally, support global warming)."

I don't know anything about this study, but it would appear to me the only reason to test the response of trees to elevated levels of CO2 is too check the increase in growth rate (read: increased CO2 absorption rate).

Such a study is much more likely to oppose global warming than to support it. This is one study I would like to see continued.

An outcome supporting global warming would be a decrease or no increase in growth rate. If they are looking for support for global warming, why not publish now if they have the data? Now maybe the scientists are afraid they will have to end their study and get a real job. That is another story.

24 posted on 11/15/2008 6:23:32 AM PST by HangThemHigh (Entropy's not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The U.S. Department of Energy, however, which is funding the project, has told the scientists to chop down the trees, collect the data and move on to new research. That plan has upset some researchers who now have to find a real job.
Gentlemen, there go our phony baloney jobs!
25 posted on 11/15/2008 6:24:01 AM PST by Condor51 (Obama believes in Karl Marx. I believe in Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
As soon as science gets it right. "Vee shall sendt schience to zee re-education kamp."

'Global Warming' is the new Lysenkoism. That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.

26 posted on 11/15/2008 6:53:54 AM PST by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

In greenhouses, the rose growers (fresh market cut flowers) have CO2 generators to pump more gas into the confined environment. If it wasn’t having a positive impact, I really do doubt the rose growers would be using the system.
Applied Ag Science 101


27 posted on 11/15/2008 7:07:08 AM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I wrote Fox and Friends this morning to report on how much carbon tax Oprah would have to pay for the CO2 emissions from her burning house and yard.


28 posted on 11/15/2008 7:14:19 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Save America......... put out lots of waferin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Why “favorite part of the story”? This study has shown how CO2 in the atmosphere benefits plant growth and how younger forests benefit most, which leads to the conclusion that cutting mature trees is good forest management.
This may not be what all the researchers wanted to find but there it is.


29 posted on 11/15/2008 7:34:52 AM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ..
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

30 posted on 11/15/2008 5:45:57 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvxiG56M-eU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

bttt


31 posted on 11/15/2008 6:16:51 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change; writer33; AT7Saluki
Why “favorite part of the story”?

The U.S. Department of Energy - demanding trees be cut down?

I'm in pig heaven.

32 posted on 11/15/2008 6:52:00 PM PST by Libloather (November is Liberal, Leftist, Marxist Awareness Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; BenLurkin; ...
thanks neverdem for the link. oldie (2001) from Popular Mechanics:
The Tree Solution
by Jim Wilson
As Greenpeace expanded to become the world's largest international environmental organization, Moore's star steadily rose and he eventually became vice president of research. Then he did something even more unexpected than joining the organization in the first place. He packed up and quit... In the months before his departure, Moore had begun talking heresy. "The environmental movement had gone astray and lost its perspective on forests," Moore says. "Rather than cutting fewer trees and using less wood, we should be growing more trees and using more wood." Greenpeace branded him an eco-Judas. Now comes the biggest surprise of all. Recently published research suggests that Moore is right. Cutting down old trees could be the best way to thwart global warming.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·
 

33 posted on 11/16/2008 8:39:22 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson