Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota Senate Recount Day 4: Work Continues in Some Counties (Coleman +115, 60% reporting)
St. Paul Tribune ^ | Last update: November 22, 2008 - 12:12 PM | By KEVIN DUCHSCHERE

Posted on 11/22/2008 12:24:12 PM PST by lewisglad

The weekend isn't bringing any respite in the Minnesota Senate recount.

Ballots in the ultra-close race between Republican Norm Coleman and Democrat Al Franken are being counted in at least three counties today.

Fifty-three counties have reported complete results to the secretary of state, meaning fewer than three dozen remain. As of Friday night, at least 60 percent of the estimated 2.9 million ballots had gotten a second look.

Coleman entered the recount with a 215-vote edge over Franken. That lead has dropped to 115 votes when comparing totals in precincts where the new count is complete. But the figure doesn't include ballot challenges, which have caused vote tallies for both men to drop.

There have been 1,525 challenges between the campaigns, although some could be withdrawn before the Canvassing Board's Dec. 16 meeting.

In a high-ceilinged warehouse in northeast Minneapolis, the recount was carefully monitored by 52 volunteer observers for Coleman and 40 for Franken.

The work area was hushed, with little conversation as people focused on their work.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: coleman; constitutionalcrisis; franken; mn2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: lewisglad
It's sad to think that the entire balance of our country could be hinging on this election!

Al Franken. A complete fraud, America hating, socialist.

BEYOND THE PALE!

81 posted on 11/23/2008 11:01:58 AM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
"Ir ia “odd” that Coleman has never gained a single vote in the proceedings, it seems. Such is MN."

Only "odd" if you assumed the proceedings were unbiased, impartial, and honest...

82 posted on 11/23/2008 11:11:54 AM PST by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

The best that can be said right now is that it’s a statistical dead heat. It looks as though the recount will remain in Coleman’s favor by 100 or so votes, but that’s swamped by the number of challenged ballots — probably nearly 3,000 by the end, and we just don’t know how good those challenges are, on either side.

If it’s true that Coleman is keeping the challenge count high to stay ahead in the recount, then he could be in trouble, but then it could be equally true that Franken is playing the same game.

At this point it’s probably safe to say that both sides are challenging anything that casts the slightest doubt and its going to be a long day for the canvassing board as they figure it all out.

Then, depending on the margin after the questioned ballots are sorted, its off to the courts we go.


83 posted on 11/23/2008 12:28:06 PM PST by tyke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: tyke
"If it’s true that Coleman is keeping the challenge count high to stay ahead in the recount, then he could be in trouble, but then it could be equally true that Franken is playing the same game."

Franken has about 50 more challenges than Coleman.

84 posted on 11/23/2008 12:52:20 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obama - not just an empty suit - - A Suit Bomb invading the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Actually, Coleman has +28 challenges over Franken.


85 posted on 11/23/2008 1:22:51 PM PST by ScottinVA (Gloucester County, VA -- Standing for America! 63% for McCain-Palin on 4 Nov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

That pretty much sums it up. Guess I’m not the only one that checked it out. LOL


86 posted on 11/23/2008 1:49:21 PM PST by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ex-Libertarian

well stated, except most likely we won’t be able to count on the appeal boards doing a fair job.


87 posted on 11/23/2008 2:15:39 PM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
the figure doesn't include ballot challenges, which have caused vote tallies for both men to drop.

88 posted on 11/23/2008 2:55:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

We might be the only two. If a mod checked his posting history, he’d be zotted by now.


89 posted on 11/23/2008 4:42:20 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (www.howobamagotelected.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

He’s gone.


90 posted on 11/23/2008 4:46:26 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

I don’t envy your job. The little buggers are everywhere these days.


91 posted on 11/23/2008 5:19:32 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (www.howobamagotelected.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

They make excellent target practice ;)


92 posted on 11/23/2008 5:21:08 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Nice ZOT! Thanks Mod. Did you know electric cars are coming? LOL


93 posted on 11/23/2008 5:25:36 PM PST by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

LOL!


94 posted on 11/23/2008 5:27:38 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
It's sad to think that the entire balance of our country could be hinging on this election!

It doesn't. The Dims will NEVER let a little filibuster rule hinder their plans.

95 posted on 11/23/2008 5:53:11 PM PST by Onelifetogive (I'm gonna drop talk radio in favor of some audio books. Gotta lower my blood pressure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Is there a scenario where the Senate itself can essentially decide which candidate to seat? If so,Coleman should start making career plans today.
96 posted on 11/23/2008 6:24:38 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bin ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mangia E Statti Zitto
...but sometimes I can’t help thinking that the thought of this clown sitting among these “illustrious” Senators has more than a few Dems nervous.

Boy...you have a higher opinion of the level of "class" that Senate RATS have than do I.**Much** higher.

97 posted on 11/23/2008 6:31:54 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bin ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I don’t believe the U.S. Senate has a say in who gets to be Minnesota’s senator if the election doesn’t get certified by Jan 20th. There is a “safe-harbor day” (Dec 9th) by which all the states have to certify their electoral college results for the presidential election or else the Senate decides for them, but I can’t find anything similar for Senate races.

I suspect that it can drag on for as long as one side doesn’t concede and continues filing law suits — even after the state has certified the election. Once certification happens (and there may be lawsuits filed in an attempt to delay that) then I suppose the declared winner can take his place in the US Senate.

It’s just a guess, but if the Supreme Court later decides that some votes were disqualified improperly and counting them was enough to change the result, then Minnesota would have to comply, but I suspect the Supreme Court would be extremely reluctant to get involved in a state election issue unless there was a very obvious miscarriage of justice.

Bottom line, I believe, is that the final say will be in the hands of Minnesota’s state government officials, not the U.S. Senate.


98 posted on 11/23/2008 11:46:54 PM PST by tyke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
This is so true and funny
99 posted on 11/24/2008 12:52:24 AM PST by babubabu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb876zkE-eE


100 posted on 11/24/2008 12:53:16 AM PST by babubabu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson