Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Great Birth Certificate Scandal/Cover-Up of ‘08
Tulsa Today ^ | Monday, 24 November 2008 | Joan Swirsky

Posted on 11/24/2008 9:38:43 PM PST by ckilmer

The Great Birth Certificate Scandal/Cover-Up of ‘08

By Joan Swirsky   
Monday, 24 November 2008
ImageAnalysis: Last week, newscasters reported that al Qaeda’s #2 terrorist disparaged the election of Barack Obama, and hurled racial slurs at Obama himself. “The report has not been confirmed by the State Department,” they all said, but they reported it anyway.

Fox News reporter Carl Cameron told viewers that three “anonymous” insiders of Sen. McCain’s campaign said that Sarah Palin was, in essence, a diva and a dunce. He – and dozens of others who picked up the story on other channels – never identified, or even verified, the sources of the quotes, but they reported them anyway.

Contrast these shabby examples of “journalism” with the legions of identifiable, verifiable and credible sources who for months have been investigating the disturbing allegation that Barack Obama is ineligible for the presidency because he has failed to meet one of the three requirements that the U.S. Constitution mandates, specifically that he provide proof of his “natural born” U.S. citizenship.

What follows is a partial list of people and organizations that have challenged Obama’s eligibility. Further on I will comment on how egregious the media’s failure to cover this story has been.  And last, I will speculate on the reason for the cover-up of this full-blown scandal.

Attorney Philip J. Berg, former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania and a longtime Democrat partisan, sued Obama and the Democratic National Committee for what he alleged was the DNC’s failure to vet Obama, and Obama’s failure to provide an authentic and verifiable U.S. birth certificate. The suit was dismissed as "too vague…" Berg filed a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court on Oct.30, to force Obama to produce his birth certificate. On Nov. 3, Justice David Souter rejected Berg’s emergency appeal for the court to halt the tabulation of the 2008 presidential election results, but set a schedule for a response from Obama, the DNC and all co-defendants on or before Dec. 1. Berg claims to have a tape recording of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother saying that she was present at Obama’s birth in Kenya, along with his half-brother and half-sister. Here is his website.

According to WorldNetDaily, blogger Jeff Schreiber said a second case was presented to the Supreme Court on the same issue, i.e., the Federal Election Commission (FEC) has waived its right to respond to a complaint brought by attorney Philip Berg, possibly – among other reasons – because they liked their odds of Berg's petition getting denied. Berg said that if the FEC filed not solely on its own behalf but “on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion."

Dr. T.B. Bradley, a forensic psychologist, stated, as part of the Berg case, that, “Upon reading all of the books written by or about Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. aka Barry Soetoro (hereinafter Obama) Applicant discerned that Obama was not a natural born citizen of the United States or if he was a natural born citizen that he had lost his citizenship when his biological mother married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia. Obama then became a citizen of Indonesia as a result of his mother's expatriation of herself and her son, by self declaration on legal public educational records that Obama was formally known as Barry Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia [and] was not US Constitutionally qualified to hold the Office of the United States Senator from Illinois or the Office of the President of the United States.”

Author, radio host, blogger, and Chicago attorney Andy Martin filed a suit in Hawaii's Supreme Court to compel Gov. Linda Lingle to release a certified copy of Obama's vital statistics record. His request was denied. On Nov. 18, he petitioned a judge in Hawaii for access to Obama’s original 1961 birth certificate, and reported that “the judge reserved judgment.” But when he arrived back in the states, he learned that Judge Bert Ayabe had dismissed the case.

Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes filed a suit with the California Secretary of State asking that the state's 55 Electoral College votes not be cast on December 15 until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. Keyes’ suit was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, along with California Electors Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson. The action states: "Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States, and, thereby, his election declared void….(a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal." Former California Secretaries of State have reviewed background documents to verify the eligibility of candidates. In 1968, the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for POTUS. Then Secretary of State, Frank Jordan, found that according to Cleaver's birth certificate, he was only 34 years old, one year shy of the age needed to be on the ballot. Mr. Jordan removed Mr. Cleaver from the ballot. Cleaver unsuccessfully challenged this decision to the Supreme Court of the State of California and to the Supreme Court.

Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan, a retired 23-year veteran of the Army, National Guard, and Air Force filed another suit in North Carolina, which claimed Obama should not have been on the state's election ballot because his citizenship is in doubt.

David M. Neal of Ohio filed a suit in Warren Common Pleas Court to force the Ohio Secretary of State, Jennifer Brunner, to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.

Cort Wrotnowski of Connecticut asked the court to order Secretary of State, Susan Bysiewicz, to verify Obama's citizenship before allowing the candidate to appear on the state ballot. The case was denied.

Steven Marquis filed a suit Washington State Superior Court, calling for Secretary of State, Sam Reed, to determine whether Obama is a citizen before Election Day, claiming the Hawaii birth certificate reveals neither the hospital where Obama was born nor a doctor's name the baby's footprint. The case was denied.

Rev. Tom Terry of Georgia appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court the day before the election to determine authenticity of Obama's original birth certificate and his qualifications to be president. Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter denied Terry's request for an injunction against Secretary of State Karen Handel.

Author Jerome Corsi, who has written extensively about this case, traveled to Hawaii and Kenya. He learned that the Certification of Live Birth that the Obama campaign posted is, according to the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, not the same as a Certificate of Live Birth, which authenticates Hawaiian birth.

Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. In November 2004 she said he was born at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, but in February 2008, she said he was born in the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children. Before the election, the Internet site, WorldNetDaily, retained a private investigator in Hawaii to visit both hospitals, but he reported that sheriff's deputies were stationed at both hospitals to fend off inquiries.

Leo C. Donofrio a retired attorney, started a website and filed a suit in New Jersey on November 3, asking Secretary of State, Nina Mitchell Wells, for an emergency stay prohibiting Obama, Sen. McCain, and Socialist Worker’s Party candidate Roger Calero, from appearing on New Jersey's ballot, claiming all three are not “natural born citizens.” On Nov. 6, Supreme Court Justice David Souter denied Donofrio's application. But the case has now entered the docket of the U.S. Supreme Court and Justice Clarence Thomas has decided to send it to conference on December 5th! This means that only 10 days before the Electoral College votes, the nine Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court will meet privately to discuss Donofrio’s case.

Douglas J. Hagmann, director of HomelandSecurityUS.com, has reported that 17 lawsuits in 12 states are challenging the eligibility of Obama to become the next President of the United States.

Numerous activist groups have undertaken letter-writing campaigns to the Supreme Court Justices, members of the Electoral College, and elected officials, as well as sending urgent appeals to the White House and the Department of Justice.

Websites like Citizens for the United States Constitution, We The People, , America Must Know, and Faith2Action  have sprung up in passionate defense of our Constitution’s integrity. The last of these has even posted the names and addresses  of Electoral College members from each state, as well as an ad in The Washington Times.  

Dozens of petitions, like this one, have been circulated.

And dozens of mostly-conservative writers (including Devy Kidd and Miichelle Malkin), bloggers and journalists have written about his strange case and potential Constitutional crisis, as I have in a series of articles – here  and here and here and here.

Coverage of the above by the media: Zero.

A DEAFENING SILENCE

It is no mystery that the leftist media have refused to mention this potentially looming Constitutional crisis in virtually all of their print and electronic coverage. Having shilled for Obama for the past two years – dismissing his longtime radical associations, obfuscating his radical voting record, and taking a pass at their jobs of vetting a presidential candidate –  their failure to cover the most explosive story of the 2008 campaign speaks volumes about collusion of the highest order.

Then there are the late-night comics, as well as snarky “humorists” like Bill Maher and Jon Stewart, who take pride in being irreverent and “outing” both people and subjects that others avoid. Not a word.

But what about the failure of the powerful conservative media – how to explain their total blackout of this story? Let’s look at their reactions:

Fox News: Total Silence. Did the healthy shares that Saudi Arabia bought of Fox influence the network’s non-coverage of this story? After all, it’s no secret which candidate the Saudis endorsed!  We know that TV shows, including Fox, are on a seven-second delay, the better to bleep out offensive or inappropriate material. Doesn’t it strike Fox viewers as strange that not one of their outspoken guests, even once, mentioned this story? Who warned them not to?

Rush Limbaugh: Total Silence. Why has the Excellence-in-Broadcasting’s “Dr. of Democracy” – the man who eats sacred cows for breakfast – not touched this story?

Mark Levin: Total Silence. Why has this popular radio host, commonly known as “the Great One,” abandoned his well-deserved reputation as a Constitutional scholar to studiously not address this Constitutional issue?

Laura Ingraham: Total Silence. Here is another radio powerhouse and former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas taking pains not to mention this case…not a word!

Bill O’Reilly: Total Silence. Yes, the guy who claims he’s “just looking out for the folks”…voiceless!

Sean Hannity: Total Silence. The iconic radio and TV host who tackles every controversial subject under the sun…missing in action!  

I could go on and on, but you get the picture. The very people – the so-called loyal opposition – who should have been shouting this story from the rooftops for months on end went mute. Ordinarily they would be the first to tell you that our Republic has no more precious document than the U.S. Constitution – a document that set the stage for the greatest experiment in human freedom since the beginning of recorded history. People like me – and multi-millions of others – are aware of what happens when the “salami tactics” of tyrants are employed in the service of leftwing ideology.

First, there is a charismatic character promising “change” and “hope,” but who changes his tune once in power. Second there is a whittling down of the laws of the land and the arrogant dismissal of the documents on which the nation was founded. Third there is the blacking-out of all media that disagree with Dear Leader’s message. And fourth there is the rounding-up and incarceration – or worse – of all dissidents.

This is not theory. This is history. But while both left and right media thought it appropriate to comment at length about Obama’s seven-page for those seeking work in his administration – a probing that makes a Pap Test, Questionnaire mammogram, colonoscopy, and endoscopy in one visit seem mild by comparison – not one of these cowardly journalists has asked the simple question: Mr. Obama, where is your birth certificate?

Or were they not cowards but patriots?

SCROUNGING FOR ANSWERS

I’ve written several books, not one of them fictional. And thousands of articles, not one of them based on sinister suspicions or conspiracy theories. But the case of the U.S. media’s complete non-coverage of this major story has gotten me to speculate on what – or who – may be behind this phenomenon. What force could be so powerful as to silence our country’s putative guardians of free speech – the titans of the Fourth Estate?

Perhaps the mystery goes back to 2004, when President Bush won his second term in office and in his first press conference in the White House said that he had "earned political capital and intended to spend it."

Then – suddenly and inexplicably – he went into a year-long hibernation. He rarely appeared in public and gave no major speeches. Finally he reemerged – albeit weakly – in late November or early December of 2005
 
Could it be that shortly after the president’s reelection, he and major government officials received highly credible evidence from America’s ruthless Islamist enemies that they had a number of devastating (probably nuclear suitcase) weapons – set up and ready to be activated in as many as six-to-10 of our major cities – unless he (the president) tacked left and played nice for the following two years?

Was America taken hostage?

The president, one could speculate, had only two choices: (1) play “chicken” and possibly sacrifice the lives of millions of Americans and the destruction of major American cities, or (2) opt for the lesser of two evils, the second being to pave the way for a dangerous Trojan Horse – qualified or not – to capture the White House.

Could it be that the media blackout of the most explosive story of any presidential election in American history has been choreographed by none other than the current POTUS – the most powerful man in the entire world? This would certainly explain why President Bush has not “been himself” since January 20, 2005.  It would also explain why the all-powerful media have taken his marching orders – including the New York Times, which takes particular pleasure in undermining and sabotaging the president, even when it comes to national security issues.

If this happened, it would have had to involve the highest echelon in our intelligence services, who might have paid personal visits to publishers throughout the United States, as well as to top TV and radio executives, who themselves would have passed down iron-clad orders – to their anchors, broadcasters, even comedians – to follow the blackout order or face Draconian consequences.

On November 4 – Election Day – the Dow was above 9,000. It is now plummeting, suggesting that even the “globalists” among us prefer tax cuts and capitalism to tax hikes and not creeping but galloping socialism – or what the esteemed Dr. Jack Wheeler insists is fascism. 

Buyers’ remorse is in the air. America has been hijacked. What a price we will pay if the Supreme Court and the Electoral College abandon their oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution by capitulating – as the media have – to our enemies. God Save America!


About the author:
Joan Swirsky (www.joanswirsky.com) is a New York-based journalist and author who can be reached at joansharon@aol.com.
 
Last Updated ( Monday, 24 November 2008 )


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; blackmail; certifigate; impeachobama; lawsuit; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: STARWISE

Hi All:

The Islamist plot on Leo was a miscommunication. It was NOT confirmed by a Rep. The post has come down from Plainsradio.com. It’s not a rumor - just a miscommunication.

Rep Sue Myrick has received threats from Islamists. I haven’t spoken to her about it though but have tried. She has been public about her concerns regarding Islamists, so threats are not surprising. The FBI, HS, NSA et al should do their thing.

Joe


61 posted on 11/25/2008 11:53:02 PM PST by RaginApache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

well, one thing Leo’s actions on the radio show did, was give him some court creds. That’s for sure. Thanks for the ping.

Happy Thanksgiving All!!


62 posted on 11/26/2008 3:36:35 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Thanks so much for doing this thread.

Your link to the doctors e-mail worked for me and I sent her an e-mail thanking her for writing the piece which sorely needed to be done.

This is a disgrace for all of us in talk radio to ignore this huge story.

63 posted on 11/26/2008 6:02:08 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG; All
I think Rush Sean and Mark are pretty tight and for some reason they may have agreed between them not to cover this,I really don't know why.

If you have a controversial story like this one you don't have to come out with a long drawn out opinion on it but merely present the facts and let listeners make up their own minds.

Not to do this is selling our movement out IMHO.

Limbaugh is all talk radio basics all the time and 99% of the time that works.

He is not covering this story because he thinks he will lose too many listeners because it is somewhat complex. In a way this shows a sort of laziness on his part for not delving into the topic more, enough so he could summarize with his brilliant talent for doing so and then presenting the topic in a summarized format.

For some reason he is not doing so and I really don't know why.

64 posted on 11/26/2008 6:09:33 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

Excellent post way to go.!


65 posted on 11/26/2008 6:14:20 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: unspun; SE Mom; Bahbah; penelopesire; Miss Didi; rodguy911; Grampa Dave; gpapa; pissant; ...
(Sorry I've been out of touch — I've been working on an article I plan to go viral with today.)

In case you missed it, at the very end of the Plain Radio broadcast, via online chat, Leo logged on, and also spoke with Ed and Caren via cell phone offline.

Leo didn't discuss the death threats (heck, he might not have even known that much about it).

He had been getting a “couple hours of sleep” just earlier — he's been going nonstop for days, guys.

However, the REAL reason Leo's was hard to reach yesterday is that he spent most of the day working with attorney Cort Wrotnowski his Connecticut case. That apparently had been submitted to the SCOTUS yesterday!

Leo thinks the way Cort's case is structured, it's even STRONGER than Leo's case!

Cort will argue that Obama has fraudulently displayed an irrelevant document claiming it validated his claim to Natural born Citizenship when in fact it does not.

Leo and Cort did not share details on their arguments, on purpose, as not to tip off the other side.

However, it sounds like while doing research, they came across a formerly-overlooked SCOTUS case that supports both of their claims about Obama’s citizenship. I am now aware of that Supreme Court case to which they referred, and after Googling it, found that it seems to be INDEED be a strong argument. I'd rather not reiterate it here, but I think I might be able to flag it to everyone’s attention soon.

To see a little of Cort's case, go to his blog here:

http://countusout.wordpress.com/2008/11/22/cort-wrotnowski-of-connecticut-vs-secretary-of-state/

Please keep up the hard work. A lot of electors, Justices and citizens need to be made aware of what's going on between now and Dec. 15!!!

66 posted on 11/26/2008 6:14:39 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Misprision: Crime of Omission (Time Mag, Friday, Mar. 04, 1966)

Is there no law against "civic indifference"? asks Lawyer George Goldberg in the American Bar Association Journal. There is indeed, he says. It is called "misprision of felony" (from the Old French mesprendre, to mistake). Misprision is a crime of omission—a failure to act. In 1907, the Vermont Supreme Court defined it as "a criminal neglect either to prevent a felony or to bring the offender to justice after its commission." Misprision thus differs from "accessory" offenses, such as assent or assistance in a felony.

67 posted on 11/26/2008 6:20:20 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Oh, also, Leo plans to be on Plains Radio’s Joe Thunder show on Thursday (yes, Thanksgiving Day) at 8 pm CST.

See you there :)


68 posted on 11/26/2008 6:22:02 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Thank you for the important update — and I agree with your interest in discipline.


69 posted on 11/26/2008 6:22:45 AM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Thanks for the feedback from Leo and the ping.

This is the link to Leo Donofrio’s new website:

http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com

The site now has a warning sign on it, more vile actions by the internet Jihad Thugs of Obama.


70 posted on 11/26/2008 6:26:05 AM PST by Grampa Dave (This is the link to Leo Donofrio's new website: http://thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
IMHO after 30 years on the air,I would have handled the interview far differently than Lamphere did.

He strayed from the original topic way too far.

Had he stuck to whether or not Obama was born here or not he would never have gotten so far afield and could have done a far better and much more professional interview with Donofrio.

He got lost in his own ego IMHO.

71 posted on 11/26/2008 6:27:15 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
VERY well summed up ckilmer
72 posted on 11/26/2008 6:31:00 AM PST by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2

BUMP


73 posted on 11/26/2008 6:32:57 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Rush mentioned this story several times on air during the last year. but the info has been to confused to run with.

The info is now gelling into a pattern.

Its all backstopped by the stonewalling of the obama camp of the release his birth certificate.


74 posted on 11/26/2008 6:34:52 AM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

So far I know that talk show hosts Brian Susaman, Barbara Simpson and Michael Savage have talked about it. They also had Berg on Coast to coast a few months ago.


75 posted on 11/26/2008 6:35:35 AM PST by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer; All
Yeah I do recall Rush's brief mentions of the story.

But for those of us who have invested months in this story for Rush to give it such short shrift almost borders on insulting, IMHO.

He is probably the only one capable of doing this story should he decide to really delve into it and do the research we have done.

Limbaugh is capable of bringing down the complexity of the entire story to the broadcast level. He just has not done it for some reason. I sure wish I knew why.

76 posted on 11/26/2008 6:52:52 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Its all backstopped by the stonewalling of the obama camp of the release his birth certificate.

Which is another good reason why changing the argument, like Donofrio has, to the issue of dual citizenship and divided loyalties for a US President is a good way to illustrate the problem.

I'm not saying give up on the BC issue. We must continue to pound that drum incessantly. BUT we will get a lot more traction if we place it in context of upholding the Constitutional requirements for President.

But we need to act NOW, not after Jan. 20. We all remember how Bill Clinton was able to stonewall on issue after issue during his 8 years. Once Obama takes office, they'll be no stopping him. His supporters will be as undying as Clinton's ever were!


77 posted on 11/26/2008 7:00:56 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Limbaugh is capable of bringing down the complexity of the entire story to the broadcast level. He just has not done it for some reason. I sure wish I knew why.
.........
You have to understand that what has finally jelled the story has been that the obama campaign has stonewalled the release of his birth certificate—even after the campaign is over.

Doing that makes all the other information stand up in formation and salute.

The obama camp did a good job of fud during his campaign such that no fact had any substance to it.

Only now does the info ring.


78 posted on 11/26/2008 7:06:10 AM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: BP2; All
Excellent post! IMHO, many of the appointments Barky has made so far including extending a pubbie for a year at defense(note only a year)are all designed to appease "us" and to get "us" off his back so the BC and other probes will all go away.

It's a slick trap and can be viewed as just more of Axelrods(the man who really pulls Barky's chain,IMHO) astroturfing games placing their own views out there while brazenly avoiding any truth of any issue at all.

These guys are slicker than the Clintons ever were and should be taken very seriously.

79 posted on 11/26/2008 7:07:11 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

The other thing is that back and June and July when we were reviewing the info on the birth certificates—at least to me —I didn’t get the message that the Obama campaign issued a COLB rather than a BC. And that in Hawaii the COLB was something generally issued to people born outside of the USA.


80 posted on 11/26/2008 7:10:34 AM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson