Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WestCoastGal; Rushmore Rocks
"... the Iranians have held at least two tests in the Caspian Sea to launch missiles in the manner necessary to set off an EMP meltdown. And if you were, say, Vladimir Putin and obsessed with restoring Russia’s superpower status, you might reasonably conclude that that might be well nigh impossible without diminishing the superpower status of the other fellow. And, while you wouldn’t necessarily want your fingerprints on the operation, you wouldn’t go to a lot of trouble to dissuade whichever excitable chaps were minded to have a go."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2149548/posts

108 posted on 12/16/2008 7:40:44 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: LucyT

About the most the Iranians could accomplish with an EMP detonation would be to set off every car and burglar alarm in Europe simultaneously.

To start with, EMP has to be high altitude, because its effects are in a downward cone, like an upside down funnel. It is also dependent on the size of the detonation.

The classical example is of an EMP burst over Kansas, having to be between 1-3 Megatons, at near orbit altitude, to affect most of the continental US. The Iranians nuclear weapons capability is about 25 Kilotons, which would have to be detonated at a much lower altitude, and would create an electrical overcharge in about half the state.

In other words, why waste it on EMP, when if they allowed it to hit the ground, it would be far more destructive?

Their other problem are targets. To start with there, Iran is ringed on three sides with 300 or so PAC-3 anti-missile missiles. They have a very high “overkill” (missile and warhead failure rate), and then their missiles would have to contend with this layered anti-missile defenses.

The US aircraft carrier fleets are designed to be very resistant to nuclear attack, both in taking out enemy missiles, and having hardened electronics. Plus our ship Captains are a testy bunch when irritated, and will retaliate with enough destructive force to wipe out a continent.

The US has also calculated that somebody might put a few missiles on a cargo ship an try and sneak them up to one of our coasts, so we not only have anti-missile defenses, but our Coast Guard regularly stops ships hundreds of miles at sea to make sure they have no nuclear cargoes.

In the last few years, it was alleged that the North Koreans were trying to smuggle nuclear materials to Iran, and two of their ships were “lost at sea” in the process. We have no sense of humor about these things.


109 posted on 12/16/2008 8:03:39 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT

EMP would require either a large number of smaller nukes (as someone said, going off at some altitude) in proximity to various sites, or a couple really enormous bombs — and why oh why was it so simple to get everyone (except China and France) to stop atmospheric testing? ;’) And France did it in a remote spot in the Pacific. Thanks LucyT.


110 posted on 12/16/2008 2:09:40 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, December 6, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT

So many ways to plot against us.


111 posted on 12/16/2008 3:21:29 PM PST by WestCoastGal (If we will hold the course, God in Heaven will raise up friends to help fight these battles.P Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson