Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

He can NOT POSSIBLY be a “natural born citizen” of the US because his father, Barack Hussein Obama Senior, was a Citizen of UK and/or Kenya....

Here is an assumption that could be wrong. Who says that BHO senior is his father? Since we cant see his original typewritten birth documents we don’t know that for a fact.

In fact if he has a different father or no father listed it is a great reason to hide the BC.


3 posted on 12/16/2008 4:31:41 PM PST by Hang'emAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Hang'emAll

Or his father could be Malcolm X or Storm Thurmond.


5 posted on 12/16/2008 4:34:37 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Hang'emAll

“In fact if he has a different father or no father listed it is a great reason to hide the BC.”

FWIW, this is what I wrote on another thread:

Why is O spending large sums to avoid disclosing his birth documents? What could be embarrassing about O’s birth documents if he was born in Hawaii to Ann and O Sr.?

Based on what we presently are allowed to know, if O was born in Kenya clearly he is not natural born. O’s newspaper birth announcement, which states only: “Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug 4” indicates O was not the child of two US citizens.

What could be wrong? 1) no father named in the documents; 2) Frank Davis appears as the father’s name; 3) place of birth: Kenya; 4) any combination. Can you think of other embarrassing possibilities?

1) is unlikely given Ann and Sr. lived together before and after the birth and in light of the birth announcement published nine days later;
2) again, inconsistent with 1) above - although this would clumsily provide two (unmarried) parents who were US citizens. Further, even if Ann had relations with Davis long before any with Sr., why would anyone advocate offering the name of a man not one’s ostensible husband? There is simply no value in 1961 to the Davis name. Of course, there is value in the Davis name in 2007/8/9 and that may have been part of the self-serving motivation behind O’s sponsorship of the 2008 Senate resolution
3) this ought to be embarrassing because its inconsistent with the life story O tells; but, that would be the least of his problems.

Your thoughts?


17 posted on 12/16/2008 4:52:25 PM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson