Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/22/2008 9:10:35 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Sub-Driver

Hmmm, explains Murkowski’s attempted preemptive strike a few weeks back.


2 posted on 12/22/2008 9:12:01 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I’d be in favor of her in the Senate. Too few conservatives there.


3 posted on 12/22/2008 9:12:42 AM PST by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Her decision, obviously, but I prefer she stay away from the Senate. She is a good executive who does not need to muddy herself with the do-nothings in Congress.
5 posted on 12/22/2008 9:14:04 AM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
She should remain a governor, where she will get more actual executive experience.

Senators are a dime a dozen.

6 posted on 12/22/2008 9:15:58 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the opium of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t think she should soil herself by being in the Senate, unless she has no plans to run for President.


12 posted on 12/22/2008 9:21:07 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"The poll, commissioned by the Daily Kos..."

LOL!!! They still fear her!

15 posted on 12/22/2008 9:25:31 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
FReepers, this is desperate spin - the last thing Palin needs is to be in the Senate. The lib media WANTS her to go to the Senate because it would keep her out of the presidential race in 2012. I mean, think about it. She goes to the Senate in 2010, then runs for President in 2012 and the lib media will crucify her for only being in the Senate for less than two years.

Palin needs to flatly deny any talk about her going to the House of Lords and state that's she committed to being Governor. And that's where should stay - as Governor, not keeping a chair warm in the Senate.

19 posted on 12/22/2008 9:36:16 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Frankly, Sarah should take Stevens place and work WITH Murkowski. We don’t need a reduction in Republican senators, we need all we can get.


22 posted on 12/22/2008 9:37:02 AM PST by Pistolshot ("Democrats don't show respect, they just demand respect " - ClearCase_guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Don’t run, Sarah, don’t run!

Stay as FAR away from the Senate as you can. That place is a political death trap. Stick it out as Gov., get reelected and then concentrate on the big prize.


24 posted on 12/22/2008 9:47:36 AM PST by ReagansRaiders (Bob McDonnell for (Virginia) Governor - 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Ugh, no. For Governor Palin, that would be worse than jail. The senate is a nest of vipers. Day in and day out, listening to the self-congratulatory speeches, the horrifying liberal spending bills, dealing with the likes of dingy, hairy reid. No, better she is out in the sunshine, where she can actually get something DONE.


25 posted on 12/22/2008 9:48:06 AM PST by redhead (If you want real PEACE, work for PROSPERITY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t support the idea of her in the Senate. Her forte is executive office. The Senate culture is built too much around “reaching across the aisle,” kissing the other party’s a$$, etc. I hope she stays as governor and builds her credentials there.


26 posted on 12/22/2008 9:51:53 AM PST by ScottinVA (islam IS the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I cannot imagine Sarah wanting to move her family to that cesspool we call D.C.


27 posted on 12/22/2008 9:52:41 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Leftists are hoping that she shoots herself in the foot by moving on to that diseased, bloated carcass known as the senate.


30 posted on 12/22/2008 9:54:40 AM PST by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The Senate would be a step down for Sarah, and a useless position for her to be in, unless Republicans can launch a national, conservative movement to capitalize on Obama’s failures.


32 posted on 12/22/2008 9:59:44 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

If Sarah runs for Senate I’m through with her.


34 posted on 12/22/2008 10:13:45 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Why do people believe that being a senator is a step up from being a governor? Could it be inside the beltway blinders?

There are 50 governors and 100 senators.
Governors make decisions; senators read questions written by staffers and act like the Spanish Inquisition in front of committee testifiers.


37 posted on 12/22/2008 10:26:16 AM PST by maica (Barack Obama is a Weathermen Project.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Why would she want to be a Senator? Historically, Senators do not become presidents. She’s a good, popular Governor. She should just stay there and do a good job running her state. Obama will trash things good.


38 posted on 12/22/2008 10:29:25 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

If she was to run for the Senate and win in 2010, then that may keep her from running for the Presidency in 2012. The presidential campaign will begin in 2011, and that wouldn’t look good for her to just get in the Senate and then announce her bid for the presidency the same year. She would look like these local politicians that run for any office that becomes available, and could hurt her.


39 posted on 12/22/2008 11:06:23 AM PST by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
A debate on the Senate floor between Sarah Palin and Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg would be something I'd pay big money to see!!
40 posted on 12/22/2008 11:07:07 AM PST by HardStarboard ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

For those in favor of her running in 2012 a run for the Senate would be a waste of time. Presidential campaigns are now started 18, if not 24 months out. So, she would win the seat, and then immediately start campaigning for president. It doesn’t gain her anything. If she waits until 2016, which I consider more likely then she would gain a lot, i.e. dealing with her biggest perceived weakeness, a lack of understanding of national issues.


41 posted on 12/22/2008 11:10:30 AM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson