Skip to comments.
The Dangers of Disputing Global Warming Orthodoxy
Ludwig von Mises Institute ^
| January 8, 2009
| David Gordon
Posted on 01/08/2009 8:27:27 AM PST by all the best
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
21
posted on
01/11/2009 3:25:15 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(First 2009 Profile update Tuesday, January 6, 2009___________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
22
posted on
01/11/2009 3:26:26 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(First 2009 Profile update Tuesday, January 6, 2009___________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: all the best
The drive against dissenters from global warming extends much further. Patrick Michaels, a leading critic, reports that an editor told him skeptical papers must face much stricter scrutiny to win acceptance. The "newly elected Democratic Governor of Virginia, Tim Kaine,
soon after taking office ratcheted up the effort to get Michaels removed" from his post of state climatologist (p. 113). In one case, when a skeptical paper evaded the landmines and secured publication, the global-warming enthusiasts demanded that an immediate rebuttal appear. The tip-off that "global warming" was a hoax was the quick appearance of totalitarians "lookin' for a horse to ride".
23
posted on
01/11/2009 7:28:53 AM PST
by
GOPJ
("A consensus of 100 scientists is undone by one fact." - - Einstein (take that Al Gore))
To: all the best
Have to see if our library has that book.
24
posted on
01/11/2009 8:02:38 AM PST
by
Dustbunny
(Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
To: all the best
Bookmark
25
posted on
01/11/2009 8:55:09 AM PST
by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
To: Red Badger
Well today, I did not need it. But, I must admit, the Cardinals are an X factor and The Eagles better not go in over confident . See the Cowboys!
To: SunkenCiv
I ran across this Colorado skeptic website, which incidentally is run by a Ph.D. in meteorology and a friend.
http://www.colo-earthfriends.org/
27
posted on
01/12/2009 1:00:33 PM PST
by
colorado tanker
("I just LOVE clinging to my guns and my religion!!!!" - Sarah Palin)
To: colorado tanker
Thanks. Craig James, longtime meteorologist on local stations here, retired. His ‘blog on the station website was ripped down as soon as — taking his critiques of the global warming scam down with it.
28
posted on
01/12/2009 1:10:41 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: colorado tanker
29
posted on
01/12/2009 1:35:35 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: Red Badger
Also, same as knowing Creationism is today. This has been going on for a very long time. That is why evolution to many appears as an almost undisputed fact. Many do not realize that they are victims of systematic promotion of false beliefs by an active and pervasive process that is carried on in universities, public schools and the media world wide. That is why one cannot trust what they are being sold by academia. Just because they claim their “facts” are undisputed certainly doesn't make it so. Buyer beware!
30
posted on
01/12/2009 3:56:12 PM PST
by
Bellflower
(A Brand New Day Is Coming!)
31
posted on
01/12/2009 5:45:09 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Dustbunny
and you might try this as well:
32
posted on
01/12/2009 5:51:16 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: all the best
Professor Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch polled climate scientists to rate the statement, "To what extent do you agree or disagree that climate change is mostly the result of anthropogenic causes?"
They received responses from 530 climate scientists in 27 countries, of whom 44 percent were either neutral or disagreed with the statement
Science magazine helpfully refused to publish the findings. As with most global warming stories, one hardly knows whether to laugh or cry.
33
posted on
01/12/2009 5:54:33 PM PST
by
denydenydeny
(If pigs could vote, the man with the slop bucket would be elected swineherd every time-OS Card)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson