Skip to comments.
Old firearms given new life by restrictive New York gun control laws
examiner.com ^
| January 19, 2009
| J.D. Tuccille
Posted on 01/30/2009 6:45:36 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: ronnyquest
A .44 caliber bullet can have good effect. If you miss, the muzzle flash will blind him, or set him on fire. If he sticks around, the empty revolver is useful with which to bang him around the head and shoulders.
And.... after 5 rounds you have a smokescreen from which to launch your next attack!
21
posted on
01/30/2009 7:24:45 PM PST
by
donmeaker
(You may not be interested in War but War is interested in you.)
To: Travis McGee
Here in Texas, I was driving into Austin the other day, and came across a flashing overhead freeway sign that said “Danger! Zombies Ahead!” Another sign nearby flashed “Nazi Zombies! Run!” Good thing I had my trusty Colt .45 with me. Never saw the Zombies, though.
22
posted on
01/30/2009 7:24:47 PM PST
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: neverdem
We should welcome NY to the 18th and 19th centuries.
23
posted on
01/30/2009 7:26:43 PM PST
by
elkfersupper
(Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: Travis McGee; Ouderkirk
Some of us can afford civil disobedience in a time that demands it, some cannot for now.
I cannot right now. If ouderkirk can..........?
24
posted on
01/30/2009 7:35:14 PM PST
by
elkfersupper
(Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: donmeaker
I don't think of it as "violating" a "law". In order to BE a Law in the first place, it must conform to the limits placed on government by our Constitution. Any law not explicitly in compliance with, or in outright defiance of, the Constitution is null and void IMO.
Any law enforcement agent, attorney general, or legislator violating the above is in violation of Title 18 section 241 and 242. Deprivation of Civil Rights under color of Law.
25
posted on
01/30/2009 7:55:13 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: familyop
A black powder revolver will work, although most of them are not very accurate or power at greater distances. But be sure to get a very good oneone that will withstand higher pressures (re. max grains of black powder), and dont load the chamber that will be under the hammer. Be wary of ricochets and bounce-backs (e.g., from hard target surfaces). And they are very messy and a little more time-consuming to clean (hot water, then oil, in my experience). And never try to do the quick draw thing with live ammo in the cylinder.Trust me. They work quite well, and are very accurate.
26
posted on
01/30/2009 7:55:59 PM PST
by
Inyo-Mono
(In Memory of My Father [1917-1988] --WWII Vet, U.S. Army Air Forces)
To: ritewingwarrior
So if you feel like your Constitutional rights have been infringed upon, by politics, then it is ok to own guns in difference to current laws?Well, the Constitution is a law too, and in fact supersedes anything that conflicts with it. So if the government which brought us both sets can't keep their lawmaking coherent, we should pay attention and obey the more restrictive and less valid of the contradictory laws?
27
posted on
01/30/2009 8:02:25 PM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Dead Corpse
If only there was some nasty penalty for legislators writing, or voting for such a law.
28
posted on
01/30/2009 8:12:49 PM PST
by
donmeaker
(You may not be interested in War but War is interested in you.)
To: cyborg; Clemenza; Cacique; NYCVirago; The Mayor; Darksheare; hellinahandcart; Chode; ...
My friends and I used to blast off along the Hudson River in Manhattan in the early 1970s. IIRC, my friend bought a copy of a Remington .36 Navy. I'm not sure if the pic above is the same, but it looked similar. There's a stretch between the George Washington Bridge and Dyckman Street that was fairly desolate. I had the bright idea of using my left hand as a rest. I got a black powder tattoo on my left hand after that. One day when I was at school they were caught by the cops who just confiscated it and my friend's souvenir from Vietnam. There was no arrest, IIRC.
Inwood, Manhattan, NY
Mayor Bloomberg Declares War On ... Salt
20 state leaders pay up tax bills [all DEMS!]
FReepmail me if you want on or off my New York ping list.
29
posted on
01/30/2009 8:15:44 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: Squantos
30
posted on
01/30/2009 8:17:15 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: donmeaker
That’s a subject for the next case that needs to come up before the Supreme Court- the incorporation of the 14th Amendment into the 2nd.
31
posted on
01/30/2009 8:25:23 PM PST
by
George Smiley
(They're not drinking the Kool-Aid any more. Now they're eating it straight out of the packet.)
To: donmeaker
There used to be.
Tar, feathers and a fence rail were the necessary ingredients.
It was a sport which involved group participation.
32
posted on
01/30/2009 8:26:57 PM PST
by
George Smiley
(They're not drinking the Kool-Aid any more. Now they're eating it straight out of the packet.)
To: neverdem
To: ritewingwarrior; neverdem
So if you feel like your Constitutional rights have been infringed upon, by politics, then it is ok to own guns in difference to current laws? You bet your a**.
34
posted on
01/30/2009 8:34:38 PM PST
by
calex59
To: ritewingwarrior
Amen. So if you can apply that principle to buying or owning an illegal gun, then why not make the same conscientious decision and not pay taxes? Isn't it the same thing? Income tax is a political issue, and certainly is Unconstitutional by a strict reading of the Constitution Actually you are wrong. Income taxes were made constitutional by the addition of the 16th amendment. I believe that amendment needs to be repealed but until it is, the income tax is constitutional. Restricting firearms ownership is not constitutional and any laws that restrict the right to keep and bear arms are illegal.
35
posted on
01/30/2009 8:37:59 PM PST
by
calex59
To: neverdem
This gear is IMO better suited for urban day to day carry.......in noooo ywark ceety !
36
posted on
01/30/2009 8:38:04 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: Squantos
I have always thought that the LeMat was a helluva firearm. The design of the hammer is so simple yet ingenious.
37
posted on
01/30/2009 8:48:16 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: neverdem
To: Army Air Corps
I agree......knowing they were expensive I know the numbers wouldn’t be allowed yet a cavalry man with 2 of those on their belt and 2 in pommel holsters with a spencer carbine and saber would have been hell on hooves to stop.
39
posted on
01/30/2009 9:04:09 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: Squantos
The action on the LeMat is nice as well and it is a heavy. When one depleted one’s ammunition, one could use it as a bludgeon.
40
posted on
01/30/2009 9:10:45 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson