Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998
When you show me WHERE I ever mentioned the War on Drugs, the New Deal or the Commerce Clause, your question will become pertinent. Until then it makes no sense.

In post #96 you wrote:

I think that many Freepers are conservative about money issues such as taxes, or national security, but become flaming leftists about pot, cops, pornography, and sex.

Since you lump the pot issue in with taxes and national security, I take that as a possible endorsement of the federal war on pot.

Now, if I'm wrong and you think it should be up to the states to decide the legality of pot, then I withdraw the question.

If you do support the federal war on pot, then I would appreciate an answer.

137 posted on 02/05/2009 5:12:48 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H

You wrote:

“Since you lump the pot issue in with taxes and national security, I take that as a possible endorsement of the federal war on pot.”

I didn’t lump them together. I juxtaposed them. Hence the word “but”.

“Now, if I’m wrong and you think it should be up to the states to decide the legality of pot, then I withdraw the question.”

You’re withdrawal of the questions has nothing to do with my position on your rabbit trail inquiry. Withdrawal it, don’t withdrawal it, I see no reason to deal with it since it doesn’t apply in any since to what is at hand.

“If you do support the federal war on pot, then I would appreciate an answer.”

Your appreciation is completely unimportant to me.


140 posted on 02/05/2009 6:51:29 PM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson