Regarding salty talk aimed at the president (or other officials) vs visits from the SS

March 5, 2009 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

Unfortunately, we are saddled with a communist sympathizer in the White House. I don't know whether or not he's an actual card carrying commie, but he's definitely an America-hating, anti-capitalist Marxist leftist who thinks communism is the way to go. Now I remember when America used to fight against communism. It wasn't that long ago. Many of us on FR are veterans of wars against communism and some of us believe that American citizens who are communists are the enemy within, ie, the domestic enemy we've sworn to defend against. American citizen? hmmmm... that may be a loophole for Obama.

At any rate, the oath is to defend our constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. I can imagine that this places an enormous strain on our Secret Service agents. It's obvious to anyone with a brain that Obama is an enemy of the constitution. So should the SS defend the constitution or defend the anti-constitution commie?

So now comes the problem. If you feel it's your duty to call Obama a traitor and use salty language in your proposed resolution, ie, suggest the commie be keelhauled, walked off the plank, run up the yardarm, tarred and feathered and run out of Dodge, etc, etc, etc, you may be facing a visit from your friendly Secret Service. And even though your visiting agent may agree politically, and may take his oath to the constitution seriously, he's still sworn to protect the officeholder and it's his duty to take all threats seriously. And that may include serving me with a subpoena to turn over your IP address. Now I'm duty bound to protect your privacy to the best of my ability, but I cannot defend against stupidity.

Best advice I can give is to keep it to yourself. Don't post anything that may embarrass you later, or end you up in the slammer.

Ever vigilant.

Keep your powder dry.

[yldstrk]

it’s a shame since narcissists wish to be thought of as important powerful and adored and that ain’t the situation—the Emporer is nekkid

[Travis T. OJustice]

Very good question. I have certainly seen more than few comments that have crossed the line.

NUTS! I've certainly felt like something should be done, but to express thoughts of committing violence towards anyone on the internet is nuts, especially in this day & age.

It's too bad Jim even had to post this warning thread.

[Rightly Biased]

I just think he's Antichrist.

So he will be punished ultimately.

Thanks for the PSA Jim.

[paulycy]

Always treat everything you write on the internet as though you were writing it on a postcard that can be seen by anyone, including the letter carrier, and that people will gossip about and act on what you have written.

[Cicero]

As I recall, the Secret Service went around and knocked on a few Freeper doors during the Whitewater years.

I trust this forum not to release our names, but some Freepers are not very cautious about that, either.

The basic rule should be don’t joke about bombs in an airport, and don’t joke about political assassinations on the web.

It was OK for leftists to hope that George Bush would die. Bush was a decent guy, and under his presidency the Secret Service simply did its job.

But clinton used to send the SS around to drag people in to jail for a day just for thumbing their noses at him, and I’m sure Obama will be much, much worse.

Also, because he’s black, they seem to be much more paranoid about security. Just look at the measures that were taken in DC during the inauguration.

So, have a care.

[Stentor]

I just hope some stupid comments Ive seen..

What were they?

[ravingnutter]

Unless FUBO is a bad word.

That's salty subsitute talk, so it is acceptable. Regular salty talk can be hazardous to your health ; )

[Constitution Day]

NUTS! I've certainly felt like something should be done, but to express thoughts of committing violence towards anyone on the internet is nuts, especially in this day & age.

"You can't fix STUPID."

[wolfcreek]

It has already been brought up.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=86324

[dforest]

I would settle for impeachment and the arrest of Congressional democrats.

[wolfcreek]

“I see pitchforks and torches on the horizon”???

DOH!!!

LOL!

[reagan_fanatic]

I’m beginning to understand how certain segments of Germany’s population felt back in the 1930’s.

[mnehring]

The reality of that passing 2/3rds of the Congress, 2/3rds of the Senate and 2/3rds of the States is, in my opinion, a virtual impossibility. By the time that happens, Bambi may have already been voted out after his first term. Just to get through 2/3rds of the States may require several election cycles.

[TFMcGuire]

Our forefathers never trusted government.

Of course they never met the wonderful, humanity-loving, Liberals of today, whose constant thoughts are involved in denying themselves and sacrificing for the benefit of the United States of America and her freedon-loving citizens.

How fortunate we are to have a paternalistic Liberal-controlled government ready to provide jobs for us, answer the deep questions of religion, teach us what thoughts to think, and even modify the value of our currecy for our good.

Be Angry, not afraid.

And all belivers should be resorting to the greatest weapon in our srsenal-—pray without ceasing.

[paulycy]

I wish no harm to the man, I simply want his policies to fail.

[Travis T. OJustice]

First time I heard him, I laughed my butt off. Damn is he funny!

[wolfcreek]

That’s good to know. Hopefully, the members of our armed forces and the nation’s LEO feel the same.

[editor-surveyor]

Bump!

[Travis T. OJustice]

The US Secret Service has determined that this post does not meet the Fairness in Posting Act of 2009, as it is critical of the President of the Entire Galaxy and Beyond, Lord 0bama, and has therefore been removed.