Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If black homosexuality accounts for only 33 percent of HIV infections, how can that be the principle transmission mechanism? Doesn't make sense.

Imagine so much concern about for a fatal disease transmitted primarily by homosexual sex and dirty needle sharing by adicts, and so much compassion for the afflicted, and contrast that with the virulent hatred and bile expressed for those who smoke cigarettes, or eat fast food.

It boggles the mind.

1 posted on 03/15/2009 8:08:09 AM PDT by wgflyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: wgflyer

None of this i surprising to me...


2 posted on 03/15/2009 8:16:49 AM PDT by babygene (It seems that stupidity is the most abundant element in the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

I’m confused - I thought that linking to the WaPo was not permitted on FR at all??

Happy to learn that I was mistaken


3 posted on 03/15/2009 8:17:07 AM PDT by VRWCTexan (History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer
"Almost 1 in 10 residents between the ages of 40 and 49 has the virus."

Holy you know what!

4 posted on 03/15/2009 8:17:22 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (Who Is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

Political correctness to the extreme. In the statistics, “homosexual contact” is the least cause (0.5%) of HIV/AID spread. “Men having sex with men” is the biggest cause (36%)


5 posted on 03/15/2009 8:17:54 AM PDT by atomicweeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

I heard years ago that the AIDs virus in Africa spread through heterosexuals who practice anal “sex”. Might that explain it? There should not be a difference between black and white infections unless there is a difference in behavior, maybe drugs, maybe something to do with “sexual” aberrations.

Of course we know it is the fault of Bush and the vast white right wing conspiracy. (sarcasm)


6 posted on 03/15/2009 8:18:34 AM PDT by 2ndClassCitizen (NAACP=Nubians Against All Caucasian People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

Generations of inbred Democrats governed by generations of inbred Democrats, drawing wealth from the hinterlands while producing nothing. And now they’re killing themselves and each other.


7 posted on 03/15/2009 8:18:48 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer
Actually, it states "Heterosexual sex was the principal mode of transmission for blacks with the disease, 33 percent.
8 posted on 03/15/2009 8:19:15 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (Who Is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer
Rom 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
10 posted on 03/15/2009 8:21:00 AM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer
"HIV/AIDS Rate in D.C. Hits 3%"

Just imagine what that is doing to the hospitals in DC.

12 posted on 03/15/2009 8:26:44 AM PDT by AGreatPer (Obama is not my president until we see his birth certificate. A real one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer
""In order to solve an issue as complex as HIV and AIDS, you have to step up," he said"

There is nothing the government or anyone can do to stop the spread of HIV. The only ones in control of it are those who have gay sex. HIV has been around for a long time now, WE ALL know the dangers of gay sex, but yet, they're out there, still having it, unprotected.

13 posted on 03/15/2009 8:27:09 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (Who Is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer
With all of the trash that Obama dragged into town with him I'd be very surprised if this number doesn't go significantly higher in the next couple of years.
14 posted on 03/15/2009 8:29:26 AM PDT by RU88 (The false messiah can not change water into wine any more than he can get unity from diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

I read the comment at the WaPo site, there are still some there that blame Reagan.

Hard to believe that Reagan can reach out from the grave and make gay black men have buttsex.


16 posted on 03/15/2009 8:29:53 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution - 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

17 posted on 03/15/2009 8:32:11 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

Men having sex w/ other men, then going home and having sex with their wives/ girlfriends.


19 posted on 03/15/2009 8:36:21 AM PDT by SoKatt ("Change" is not a strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

Considering that they only make-up 10% or so of the general population, having 33% of any statistical category says a lot.


21 posted on 03/15/2009 8:46:18 AM PDT by aft_lizard (One animal actually eats its own brains to conserve energy, we call them liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

Here’s the deal:

A woman can get aids through herto sex with an infected man (but not the other way around), or a needle. But not from homo sex with another woman.

A man gets it through homo sex or a needle. Not through hetro sec with a women.

Babies get it from their mother


22 posted on 03/15/2009 8:47:59 AM PDT by babygene (It seems that stupidity is the most abundant element in the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer
If black homosexuality accounts for only 33 percent of HIV infections, how can that be the principle transmission mechanism? Doesn't make sense.

Rule number one. The Aids rate is directly proportional to promiscuity.

Two homos cannot infect one another unless they have multiple partners of which at least one of them is infected. In the case of your assertion, I would suspect bisexuals, who are extremely promiscuous, carry the virus back and forth among the usual identified groups. Note, we never seem to get statistics on bisexuals. The heterosexual statistics are thrown in there to drag the ordinary dolt into feeling obliged to fund a cure. This will never be offered as useful information in primary school sex education.

26 posted on 03/15/2009 8:49:55 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

Male homosexuals are the #1 vector for the spread of infectious diseases in the country. HIV is one of more than a dozen diseases transmitted by these deviants, and those homosexuals with AIDS, are also the breeding ground for antibiotic resistant organisms. The public health threat of this behavior is a monstrous economic burden to health care in general and all because of a mental derangement now promoted as acceptable.


30 posted on 03/15/2009 8:54:58 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Freedom's Precious Metals: Gold, Silver and Lead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

It is more politically palatable for the liberals to maintain the primary cause is homosexuality because it is an ‘alternative lifestyle’ which allows them to blame government for not taking enough money from hard working Americans to fund ‘aids research’. Blaming the primary mode of transmission on needles isn’t politically defensible - yet. Just give Obama enough time. He’ll find a way to blame you and me for some poor black person sticking a dirty needle in their arm and getting aids...It WILL happen.


31 posted on 03/15/2009 9:00:08 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wgflyer

HIV/AIDS is given the same excuse and mantra for “the problem” as public education - taxpayers not spending enough money to “solve the problem”.

We know that excuse is a lie in both cases.

In one case we have sex addicts and in the other we have an industry - “public education” - addicted to YOUR money - they can never get enough of it, and the more they are given the worse the addiction becomes.


33 posted on 03/15/2009 9:06:36 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson