Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Administration Stabs Gun Owners in the Back (DoD Surplus Brass No Longer Sold for Reloading)
Townhall ^ | March 16, 2009 | John Caile

Posted on 03/16/2009 11:35:39 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

We warned you that Barak Obama would publicly deny his radical anti-gun agenda, while engaging in "stealth" attacks on private gun ownership. The most recent example is a directive from the Department of Defense that will severely aggravate the current ammunition shortage.

For those who either don't own guns (or have been living in a cave) supplies of ammunition are getting alarmingly low. Many retailers report shelves virtually empty of popular pistol and rifle ammo.

Most ammunition manufacturers depend on reclaiming used brass cartridge cases from the military, that are then recycled to make new ammunition. It is a system that has benefited both the military and the private sector, not to mention saving the taxpayer's money.

So it is beyond comprehension at a time of serious ammunition shortages, as well as budget shortfalls, that ammunition manufacturers would receive a letter stating the following:

"Effective immediately DOD Surplus, LLC, will be implementing new requirements for mutilation of fired shell casings. The new DRMS requirement calls for DOD Surplus personnel to witness the mutilation of the property and sign the Certificate of Destruction.

Mutilation of the property can be done at the DRMO, if permitted by the Government, or it may be mutilated at a site chosen by the buyer. Mutilation means that the property will be destroyed to the extent prevents its reuse or reconstruction. DOD Surplus personnel will determine when property has been sufficiently mutilated to meet the requirements of the Government."

Now, one has to be curious about WHO suddenly decided to mandate a new policy that makes a bad situation worse, has no benefit to the military, and will result in an increase in costs to the American taxpayer, precisely when the government is running a gigantic deficit.

But of course we know the real reason behind such actions - after losing a number of elections both locally and nationally, the anti-gun radicals have learned that the way to succeed is to avoid highly public confrontations like wholesale gun bans.

Instead they have adopted "incrementalism" - stealth campaigns that slowly rob legitimate gun owners of their ability to exercise their rights. They know that they don't need to take your guns away if they can simply make it more and more complex, expensive, and difficult to own and use your guns.

So, obviously, something like an ammo shortage is a dream come true for the gun haters. Why bother with their guns when simply denying them ammunition makes their firearms useless?

One wonders when gun owners who were stupid enough to have voted for Obama (and his like minded Democrats in the Congress) will finally stop denying the obvious.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; agenda; banglist; barackobama; bho2009; bho44; bhobanglist; bhodod; dod; ericholder; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
BLOAT!!
1 posted on 03/16/2009 11:35:39 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is an opportunity for MORE pro gun legislation.

Force the Dems to vote against it.

Defeat the Dems next year!

2 posted on 03/16/2009 11:39:01 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

ping


3 posted on 03/16/2009 11:41:19 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What were they doing with bras in the first place? Slingshots??



4 posted on 03/16/2009 11:41:34 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (American Revolution II -- overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There has been discussion about this on some other forums and it has been suggested that this may be a mistake or something else and will be rectified. I don’t know but it’s something that I would expect from “zero” and it is huge.


5 posted on 03/16/2009 11:41:59 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck. (Let them eat arugula!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We warned you that Barak Obama would publicly deny his radical anti-gun agenda, while engaging in "stealth" attacks on private gun ownership. The most recent example is a directive from the Department of Defense that will severely aggravate the current ammunition shortage.

When a friend of mine recently bought 4,000 rounds of ammo (of varying caliber) at a Virginia gun show (most) in hugh sealed cans, I thought he was being paranoid.

Well, I was wrong. I hope the 400 rounds of 357 and 20ga will last me

6 posted on 03/16/2009 11:43:55 AM PDT by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Jeff at GI Brass says that he can sell what he has but there won't be anymore.

http://www.gibrass.com/brass.html

7 posted on 03/16/2009 11:44:31 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck. (Let them eat arugula!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

“There has been discussion about this on some other forums and it has been suggested that this may be a mistake or something else and will be rectified. I don’t know but it’s something that I would expect from “zero” and it is huge.”

I don’t know if its real or not, but I would suspect that Obama would prefer to tax ammo than raise the cost by restricting brass. Restricting brass loses the govt money, where a tax would net the feds income. Of course they could be planning to do BOTH.


8 posted on 03/16/2009 11:46:30 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Maybe not. Gun forums are discussing this and it’s not sure that’s what is going on. Here’s a good discussion.

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=344718


9 posted on 03/16/2009 11:46:52 AM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
BLOAT!!

For one to BLOAT, someone else must SLOAT.

Got any leads?

10 posted on 03/16/2009 11:47:32 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So I guess Obama’s against recycling. Not very “green” of him.


11 posted on 03/16/2009 11:47:39 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Don’t worry, folks. The Chinese will step in and bail us out! /sarc


12 posted on 03/16/2009 11:48:58 AM PDT by papasmurf (Trow da' bum out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

To all FReepers: Call the NRA at 1-800-392-8683 and request they get involved in this.


13 posted on 03/16/2009 11:50:35 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead
Restricting brass loses the govt money

THe government doesn't care in the least about losing money. They don't work for it - they just take it from those of us who do work.

14 posted on 03/16/2009 11:51:59 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ummm....There was further discussion, and THIS popped up :

http://cgi.govliquidation.com/auction/view?id=2247011&convertTo=USD

There are a lot of pretty sensible folks at The Firing Line,and the general conclusion was: This is a BS story-put into circulation by folks who wanted to rile us up.

There are a LOT of “let’s-rile-’em-up “ stories out there.


15 posted on 03/16/2009 11:53:24 AM PDT by mrmeangenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So the shell casings are now worth their value as scrap.

What overseas company will get it all?

It wont stay in the US, that’s a guarantee.

I doubt an american ammo mfg will get to use the supply of shredded brass, even to melt it down and start from scratch.

China, Korea, or some other huge buyer of US recycled material will get it all.

Maybe it will come back to us, as pieces of the old Chicago elevated trains system came back to us in WWII.


16 posted on 03/16/2009 11:54:45 AM PDT by Ender Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scan59

ping


17 posted on 03/16/2009 11:55:54 AM PDT by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrmeangenes

We have to make sure that THEY make the first objectionable move - not us.

That’s why 10th amendment legislation at the state level is so necessary.


18 posted on 03/16/2009 11:56:04 AM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So what the article is saying is that the ammo we buy has used military brass??? OK for say .308/.223/9mm but 30-30/.45/30-06/30 carbine (do they still use that?) - you folks with those 50cal’s are in big trouble ....


19 posted on 03/16/2009 11:58:08 AM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrmeangenes
There are a LOT of “let’s-rile-’em-up “ stories out there.

Maybe. But, I remember that one a few months back about coming shortages of 9mm and .380ACP ammo, and I've been unable to find any .380ACP anywhere - online, in gunshops, even at Wally World.

Sometimes those stories turn out to be true.

20 posted on 03/16/2009 12:01:20 PM PDT by TonyInOhio ("Everyone wants to save the world; no one wants to help Mom with the dishes." PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson