Now if we could only see that Birth Certificate.
ping
“Louisiana has 15 days to”
I guarantee the Louisianans who joined the union did not have this in mind.
I fear this boy will need a lot of counseling later on in life.
The judge is ordering the state to lie on a vital record. Courts don't have that authority, and the State of Louisiana needs to remind this moron of that fact.
This would make the birth certificate as fraudulent as the one BO gave us.
I would tell the Feds to shove it1
Lavender mafia.
And still, people believe the Daily KOS/Factcheck version of an abstract of 0bama’s BC...
I have mixed feelings on this. Adoptees are ALL subject to having their original birth certificates altered so that they reflect the names of their two legal guardians (with no indication they are adopted). While I personally don’t like the idea of a gay couple adopting a child this child WAS adopted in accordance with the laws in the State in which they adopted.
What is the solution here? Do you want this judge to NOT alter the Birth Certificate (illegal according to the state laws), or only put down ONE guardian (legally these men ARE this child’s legal guardians), or would you like them to create a “Special” Birth Certificate for this child (create a “special class” of citizens)?
I’ve got a GREAT idea — How about we DON’T tamper with ANYONE’s BIRTH CERTIFICATES, and instead issue certificates of GUARDIANSHIP for all adoptive parents? Wouldn’t THAT be a MUCH better idea? (Heck, it may head off some eligibility questions in the future on whether foreign-born adopted children are “natural born citizens” as well! (Too bad this wasn’t thought of before Barry Soetero/Obama/whoever got elected, eh????).
That way we wouldn’t have ANY of these problems, would we???
It’s ridiculous that states make it possible for parents to lie to their adopted children by making it appear on all legal paperwork as if they had never been adopted in the first place... At least this boy will never live under some misconception that he wasn’t adopted!
Wouldn’t it be an adoption certificate not a birth certificate?
Does this even make sense? Even if they want to raise him, at most only one of them contributed DNA - and who is the mother?
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Checkout: http://SilencingChristians.com
Or what? Is Obama going to deny Louisiana its stimulus money?
I’m not sure if it plays in this but, not known to many, Louisiana uses a Napoleonic code as a basis for their civil laws. (Which is why, when one graduates from law school you’re told that you can practice law in all 50 States except Louisiana.)
So, the Federal Judge might be upholding the State’s intent. Doubtful, but possible.
From Wiki:
Civil law
The Louisiana political and legal structure has maintained several elements from the time of French governance. One is the use of the term “parish” (from the French: paroisse) in place of “county” for administrative subdivision. Another is the legal system of civil law based on French, German and Spanish legal codes and ultimately Roman law—as opposed to English common law. Common law is “judge-made” law based on precedent, and is the basis of statutes in all other U.S. states. Louisiana’s type of civil law system is what the majority of nations in the world use, especially in Europe and its former colonies, excluding those that derive from the British Empire. However, it is incorrect to equate the Louisiana Civil Code with the Napoleonic Code. Although the Napoleonic Code strongly influenced Louisiana law, it was never in force in Louisiana, as it was enacted in 1804, after the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. While the Louisiana Civil Code of 1808 has been continuously revised and updated since its enactment, it is still considered the controlling authority in the state. Differences still exist between Louisianan civil law and the common law found in the other U.S. states. While some of these differences have been bridged due to the strong influence of common law tradition, [9] it is important to note that the “civilian” tradition is still deeply rooted in most aspects of Louisiana private law. Thus property, contractual, business entities structure, much of civil procedure, and family law, as well as some aspects of criminal law, are still mostly based on traditional Roman legal thinking. Model Codes, such as the Uniform Commercial Code, which are adopted by most states within the union including Louisiana, are based on civilian thought, the essence being that it is deductive, as opposed to the common law which is inductive. In the civilian tradition the legislative body agrees a priori on the general principles to be followed. When a set of facts are brought before a judge, he deduces the court’s ruling by comparing the facts of the individual case to the law. In contrast, common law, which really does not exist in its pure historical form due to the advent of statutory law, was created by a judge applying other judges’ decisions to a new fact pattern brought before him in a case. The result is that historically English judges were not constrained by legislative authority.
Oren Adar and Mickey Ray Smith, who now live in San Diego, but adopted the boy in New York state, want both their names on his birth certificate.If this were 2004, John Kerry would be calling this a states' rights issue.
Homo fruits.
So a citizen of Louisiana who has a concealed carry permit from his home state has that same right in the state of New York. Right? Seems reasonable to me.