Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Mitt Romney is in, I'm out!
Declaration of Independence | April 30, 2009 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 04/30/2009 11:50:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

Yeah, I know. Said some similar things about Bush in 2000. But at least he was pro-life, pro-family, etc, and thank God we supported him over the idiot All Green Gore.

Said similar things about McCain in 2008. But when asked the question "when does human life begin?," and he unabashedly stated, "At conception, of course," I had to take notice. Then when he announced Sarah Palin as his running mate, I decided to support her. I voted for Sarah (and the white haired old geezer that came along with the package).

But Romney is a NO go. And I don't care who this socialist, abortionist, homosexualist, constitution trampling bastard picks for running mate. If Romney's in I'm out!

G.O.P., R.I.P!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionist; bugzapper; fakeromney; generalromney; homosexualagenda; jimrob; letthepurgebegin; magnumopus; mittromney; moralabsolutes; pragmatic; pragmatism; pragmatist; pragmatists; prolife; purgeromney; rino; rinoalert; rinoparty; rinopurge; rinoromney; romney; romneyantipalin; romneyantithompson; romneycare; romneyfakebadges; romneyhatesquad; romneyseamus; romneytruthfile; rudymcromney; socialist; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,261-1,278 next last
To: andy58-in-nh

so...........are you going to run?? :) if so, what state are you in (I know you said you would run for congress but not sure you want to get that detailed as to what district)?


161 posted on 04/30/2009 1:12:15 PM PDT by spacejunkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Ditto bump.


162 posted on 04/30/2009 1:13:28 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
but I think he was basically honest and he would have certainly put the country first.

Gang of fourteen ring any bells?

163 posted on 04/30/2009 1:14:43 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing

Ok, we’ll start at the bottom of my long list and work our way up crossing off those we find unacceptable. The last conservative standing will be our endorsee.

Let’s see now... How about REPUBLICAN Senator Olympia Snowe?


164 posted on 04/30/2009 1:15:55 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Irishman185
Your tagline: HATE rears it's ugly head. sic (It's = It is. Its = belonging to it.)

What do Romney supporters, children, and Liberals have in common? They use the word "hate" to attribute motives for arguments they cannot counter reasonably. The child screams "Mommy, you HATE me!" when Mom says no to ice cream before dinner. The Liberal screams, "Right wingers HATE blacks!" when conservatives object to affirmative action that is racist to the core.

And the Romney supporter screams "You HATE Romney and/or Mormons!" when conservatives object to Romney's track record of betraying conservative principle such as smaller government and the abomination to God that is government-subsidized abortion.

Your tagline is a perfect example of emotional, childish mindlessness raising its ugly head.

165 posted on 04/30/2009 1:16:52 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
As I’ve often said, Romney ran the uber-liberal state of MA as best he could.

He was liberal when he got there and he was the fourth Republican Governor in a row.

166 posted on 04/30/2009 1:16:59 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing

Well, support RINOs then. Just know that some of us will not do so under any circumstances.

But frankly, I find it shocking that you can survey the wrechage created by years of the compromise of principle and then reach the conclusion that the answer to cleaning up the mess is more compromise.


167 posted on 04/30/2009 1:17:08 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TATBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Make that “wreckage.”


168 posted on 04/30/2009 1:18:33 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TATBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny; Jim Robinson
Now is the time to let the GOP know that we will not accept the likes of Romney as the next nominee; not a year or so from now when he'll have laid down the groundwork to be the nominee in 2012.

Amen.

169 posted on 04/30/2009 1:18:33 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
For me,yeah. What we need is a true, strong conservative with the stones of a Ronald Reagan. Sorry I just don’t see that in Palin.

Let me see, she took on the the state Republicans and won.

She took on the state Democrats and won.

She took on the oil companies and won.

She was the only real fighter in the McCain campaign.

She hasn't been bowed by the brutal media onslaught.

She articulates conservative social principles and sticks by them.

She cut Alaska's spending to balance the budget.

She supports gun rights.

She understands both the economic and strategic value of energy exploration.

She stands up for low taxes.

Frankly, I don't see how she can have stones that big and still be so damn HOT!

170 posted on 04/30/2009 1:19:00 PM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie01

I’m in New Hampshire, CD 1.


171 posted on 04/30/2009 1:19:21 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Don’t you think that Palin running with Mclame clearly showed she agrees with him on the issues more then she disagrees?

I know you’re one of the last people I would ever have to re-hash all of McCain’s BIG govt, rino positions. He’s done more to stab conservatives in the back and help his “friends” across the isle then anything he’s ever done to prove he’s conservative. He might as well switch parties for a all I care.

Palin would’ve gone along with him just to get her hat in the ring for the future? That’s sad if true.


172 posted on 04/30/2009 1:21:14 PM PDT by Bullish ( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
"Where is our 21st century Calvin Coolidge? Or George Washington?"

How about "settling" for a Ronald Reagan, maybe someone who, like Ron, honed his speaking skills on radio, and is practiced at delivering a Conservative-with-a-capital-'C' message?

Someone whose first initial is "Rush"...

173 posted on 04/30/2009 1:22:47 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
[Romney] has the smell of Arlen Specter, opportunist extraordinaire, about him...

WELL SAID, Jonesie!

174 posted on 04/30/2009 1:23:24 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Telegraph.co.UK

September 10, 2008

Sarah Palin is ‘the new Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan’

American conservatives have reacted with near ecstasy to the Republican convention speech by Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska....

A star is born. She stuck the knife in with a big smile, a kind of ‘Make my day’ look,” said Michael Barone, conservative columnist and editor of “The Almanac of American Politics”.

In a column entitled “Welcome Back, Dad”, Michael Reagan, adopted son of the late president, wrote: “I saw my Dad reborn; only this time he’s a she. And what a she!”

Larry Kudlow asked whether “we’re not witnessing the Western frontier version of Margaret Thatcher”.
He added: “She connected really well with middle-class working folks, both in cultural and social terms, which is no small feat: values matter and the Democrats are in trouble here - big-time. The more they go after Palin culturally, as they have already, the more trouble they’ll fall into.”

Jonah Goldberg of the conservative “National Review” enthused: “She was put on this earth to do two things: kill caribou and kick butt. She’s all out of caribou.”

Mrs Palin electrified the Republican convention, declaring herself an “average hockey mom” and launching a blistering attack on Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee and his “clouds of rhetoric”.

After three days of scorn from Democrats and relentless media scrutiny, Mrs Palin came out punching, mocking Mr Obama as someone who makes “dramatic speeches before devoted followers” and has “authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform - not even in the state senate”.

Throwing down the gauntlet to the press, she said: “I’m not a member of the permanent political establishment. And I’ve learned quickly, these past few days, that if you’re not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone.

“But here’s a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion; I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country.”


175 posted on 04/30/2009 1:23:29 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
And I don't care who this socialist, abortionist, homosexualist, constitution trampling bastard picks for running mate.

Those are a lot of accusations against someone most of us thought was a Conservative.

I just checked out the "abortionist" and "homosexualist" claims, and you're right.

So, if not Mitt in 2012, then who???

176 posted on 04/30/2009 1:23:32 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (We're living in the Dark Ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing
That’s why we, uh.....got Obama.

Acorn, and the MSM had everything to do with, why we got Obama.

177 posted on 04/30/2009 1:23:35 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51

She “took on” one of the worst RINO’s for a running mate? That right there shows she won’t be my future candidate.


178 posted on 04/30/2009 1:24:04 PM PDT by Bullish ( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It’s probably just as well, Jim. I know here in the South there are alot, and I do me ALOT, of hardcore Christians that won’t vote for him because he’s mormon. He has no chance of winning the White House.


179 posted on 04/30/2009 1:24:33 PM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
"If Mitt Romney is in, I’m in. No finer person and/or candidate."

Except anyone else...

Yer not a conservative, are ya?

180 posted on 04/30/2009 1:24:44 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,261-1,278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson