Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/21/2009 10:38:07 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 05/21/2009 10:38:37 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

So, how is bat boy doing these days?

And I see that the moon is in the 7th house and Jupiter has aligned with Mars.


3 posted on 05/21/2009 10:40:18 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

“Jørn Hurum, at the University of Oslo, the scientist who assembled the international team of researchers to study Ida is relaxed about using the phrase [“missing link” to describe Ida]. “Why not? I think we could use that phrase for this kind of specimen,” he said. “[People] have a feeling that if something is important it is a missing link.”

Hahahahahahaha....VERY scientific...hahahahahaha....


4 posted on 05/21/2009 10:41:38 AM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Aren’t there about a gazillion missing links they need to find in order to show macroevo?


6 posted on 05/21/2009 10:45:42 AM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Ha ha ha! The “real story” from AiG. Aren’t we lucky to have GGG to keep us on the straight and narrow?


7 posted on 05/21/2009 10:48:30 AM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Why don’t you creationist bozos give your own seriously flawed theory the same critique that most real scientists give their own pet theories. Bounce it against the data and the facts.


12 posted on 05/21/2009 11:01:56 AM PDT by nuke rocketeer (File CONGRESS.SYS corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

It’s almost the 100th anniversary of the Piltdown Man.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_man


15 posted on 05/21/2009 11:04:30 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Looks like the hype about the hype will outlive the hype.


18 posted on 05/21/2009 11:05:54 AM PDT by tacticalogic (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

ida? you mean, ida noe? my kids told me she was real but i just did not believe it! wow, i guess this creature has descendents that live in my house and do all kinds of stuff and then blames my kids. do you think i should apologize to them for yelling “ there is no such creature as ida noe!”?


19 posted on 05/21/2009 11:14:42 AM PDT by madamemayhem (what would john wayne do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
I knew this story would create a panic among the creationist.

Oh no. science! must ridicule! must supress!

So predictable.

20 posted on 05/21/2009 11:19:24 AM PDT by Jeff Gordon (I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

So, is this just another tadpole fossil they named “Ida” to make it seem they are soing something important for all that taxpayers money?


27 posted on 05/21/2009 11:33:18 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

I noticed that some of those evolutionists who showed up yesterday to make fun of the first article by ICR kind of quieted down when major news articles came out saying the same thing.


39 posted on 05/21/2009 1:12:09 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
It seems as though the scientific process had been rushed and the claims exaggerated in a bid to promote a new documentary and book on the fossil. Sadly, media pressures sometimes trump full research integrity (something we’ve seen before), and careless media sources reprint explosive (and unjustified) quotations without consulting as many scientists as they should. Thankfully, though, many in the scientific community are questioning the research and beginning to become more vocal about their concerns regarding how good science and media aren’t the best mix.

Yup, and if anyone points it out, they get attacked by the hissy-fit liberals exclaiming any examination, any ciritique is anti-science religious assaults on their cult.

40 posted on 05/21/2009 1:14:27 PM PDT by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for g!ood men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
From the desperation being shown by the Darwin idolaters, it appears that this "fossil find" is a last-ditch effort to prop up their dying religion of evolutionary scientism.

All their other evidence has fallen like a house of cards - then they throw in this "Piltdown lemur" to try start the evo craze anew, and it's totally backfired on them! Obviously, the intense ruckus is afoot because they know, without this fossil, there's nothing else left to prop up their theory, and hence no way to justify their loose morals in their godless fantasy world.

We indeed live in a privileged time, to be witnessing what looks like the final collapse of Darwin's demonic philosophy! When the evo bandwagon is finally capsized, and science can again be pursued according to the will of our Creator, we might finally again see real scientific progress again, as opposed to the secular stagnation of the last century.

49 posted on 05/21/2009 2:01:55 PM PDT by WondrousCreation (Good science regarding the Earth's past only reveals what Christians have known for centuries!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
Warning!
This is a Meta-article that contains
no site-specific scientific data or research whatsoever
and is produced by a member of an obscure, unrecognized, non-scientific
internet group attempting to pass off her agenda as scholarly.
They are not constituted to provide proof of Creationism but instead
merely to snipe snidely and spam the internet with their Trollisms.
Buyer Beware!

58 posted on 05/21/2009 3:46:57 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (Creationists on the internet: The Ignorant, amplifying the Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson