Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Make Believe Sotomayor
American Thinker ^ | June 05, 2009 | J.C. Arenas

Posted on 06/05/2009 5:15:13 AM PDT by crunchcrunch

While Democrats have exaggerated her background, burnished her career, and misrepresented her philosophy to seek approval from the court of public opinion, Judge Sonia Sotomayor has been equally misleading about herself. As more of her words from the past begin to surface, it has become apparent that who she really is and who she portrays herself to be aren't the same person.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; sotomayor

1 posted on 06/05/2009 5:15:13 AM PDT by crunchcrunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: crunchcrunch

Gee, kinda like Obama does eh?


2 posted on 06/05/2009 5:17:19 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775

Both of these clown shows have the same focal point — Convice enough ignorant people with their feelings.


3 posted on 06/05/2009 5:23:48 AM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: crunchcrunch
Sotomayor's behavior is troubling because there was already reason to question her performance as a jurist. But now her integrity also has to be called into question when she's caught exaggerating her biography and backpedaling on her philosophy solely to enhance her profile and advance her career.

The more you peel an onion, the greater the smell and the more you cry.

4 posted on 06/05/2009 6:00:03 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crunchcrunch

Phony, racist hag.


5 posted on 06/05/2009 6:41:21 AM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crunchcrunch

Let me get this straight:

We are replacing a guy who had an unknown judicial philosophy that proved to be a radical with a woman who we know has a radical judicial philosophy but is trying to hide it?

Why in the world would ANY Republican support her?


6 posted on 06/05/2009 6:46:13 AM PDT by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
We are replacing a guy who had an unknown judicial philosophy that proved to be a radical with a woman who we know has a radical judicial philosophy but is trying to hide it?

Why in the world would ANY Republican support her?

That's why they're called the stupid party. They do politics like scheps. They want to reach across the aisle. The rats go for the throat. Remember how they treated Janice Rogers Brown and Miguel Estrada.

It's not about race or sex. It's about ideology.

7 posted on 06/05/2009 11:47:06 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson