Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysts: NKorea's chemical arms as grave as nukes
AP/Yahoo News ^ | 6/18/09 | JAE-SOON CHANG

Posted on 06/18/2009 12:14:52 PM PDT by Kartographer

SEOUL, South Korea – North Korea's massive stockpile of chemical weapons is as threatening as its nuclear program, analysts said Thursday, highlighting an aspect of the secretive regime's pursuit of weapons of mass destruction that is rarely talked about.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: biochemicals; chemicals; nkorea; northkorea; wmds
Just incase you've ran out of things to worry about. ;-)
1 posted on 06/18/2009 12:14:52 PM PDT by Kartographer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

I thought they lacked the protective equipment to fight on a chemical battlefield. Kinda makes them useless for taking the south. Still be good terror weapon for murdering civilians I guess.


2 posted on 06/18/2009 12:26:30 PM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new enviromentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Incinerate them all. Seriously, how tough would it be to pinpoint a strike on that little mutant bastard. With a surgical strike on the leadership and a blitkrieg-style invasion, we could wrap these guys up in a matter of weeks. The populace would be overjoyed, if only because they would be eating.


3 posted on 06/18/2009 12:27:41 PM PDT by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

I read an unclassified US government circular back in the early 90’s that claimed NK was in possession of thousands of metric tons of various chemical weapons including mustard gas, blister, and nerve agents, ready for deployment in standard field artillery shells.


4 posted on 06/18/2009 12:35:50 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: east1234

Considering the number of artillery tubes targeting Seoul, chem weapons would destroy the city’s population in short order.


5 posted on 06/18/2009 12:38:58 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

And one well placed nuke, granted with a whole lot of luck, would keep a fleet at bay long enough to use them until they run out, as well as invite the chinese to come in as a “sheild”.


6 posted on 06/18/2009 12:43:00 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: domenad

>Incinerate them all.<

.
Douglas Mac is that you?


7 posted on 06/18/2009 12:48:32 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: domenad
The Norks have thousands of artillery tubes buried in mountain sides aimed right at the heart of Seoul. The estimates we got said something like 10,000 rounds an hour could be expected.

While we'd get them eventually it's entirely possible nearly a million South Korean civilians would die.

8 posted on 06/18/2009 12:50:07 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I bet more than a million. Mustard gas is heavy, and runs downhill.

If I were a kenyan in hawaiian clothing, I would pull my fleet away and start running bomber patrols. Massive pullout of ground forces too. At least on film. And use ABC to show footage of it to the world.

When rattling sabres, a claymore makes a more rubust clang...


9 posted on 06/18/2009 1:04:14 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

True, but I don’t know how much enthusiasm the North would have for simply slaughtering civilians while the two most tech advanced armies are rolling up through your territory. Perhaps that’s not a risk that should be taken though, given the potential for civilian deaths.


10 posted on 06/18/2009 1:09:21 PM PDT by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Sounds like they would have to be immediately disabled. Wonder if that could be done with minimal losses?


11 posted on 06/18/2009 1:15:41 PM PDT by mcshot (The line has been drawn in the sand: It's good vs evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: domenad
True, but I don’t know how much enthusiasm the North would have for simply slaughtering civilians

I reckon they'd show more than enough enthusiasm.

12 posted on 06/18/2009 1:16:43 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cobra Scott

Quickly send your plan to TOTUS so the world can be saved.


13 posted on 06/18/2009 1:20:46 PM PDT by mcshot (The line has been drawn in the sand: It's good vs evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

LOL! This is my fantasy and bears no resemblence to reality!

Seriously I do worry. This is provocation designed to place economic hardship on the US. The north can sit and wait in abject poverty for a long time as long as they don’t pull the trigger first.

Funny how a big factor in 0s election was this idea of “change” and now it sure does seem like someone who had been there and done that ends up just a little bit more savvy on the situation.


14 posted on 06/18/2009 1:27:20 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson