Hat tip to Lorianne & BIGLOOK!
1 posted on
06/20/2009 3:02:19 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: Lorianne; BIGLOOK; Admin Moderator
Lorianne, with verboten sources like the UK’s Independent, all you can do is link the title, no text, IIRC.
admin moderator, any corrections are always appreciated.
2 posted on
06/20/2009 3:07:09 PM PDT by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
3 posted on
06/20/2009 3:15:40 PM PDT by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: neverdem
4 posted on
06/20/2009 3:17:59 PM PDT by
silverleaf
("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
To: neverdem
Both investigators are quick to point out that the outcomes in these two patients need to be validated in further studies. Further studies? Yes. But there were 108 in this study, half randomized to the treatment group and half to the control group. So two of the 54 in the treatment group had this amazing response. But 52 didn't.
Same old, same old as every clinical trial I've ever worked in or heard about... It should always make us suspicious when a couple of overenthusiastic researchers start counting their Nobel Prizes before they hatch.
5 posted on
06/20/2009 3:18:08 PM PDT by
LibWhacker
(America awake!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson