Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Cronkite Tragedy: How a great newsman helped undermine his profession’s ethos.
WALL ST. JOURNAL: BEST OF THE WEB TODAY ^ | JULY 20, 2009, 3:05 P.M. ET | By JAMES TARANTO

Posted on 07/20/2009 12:36:14 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

Walter Cronkite will be remembered for two things: a career that spanned six decades, during which he personified the 20th-century journalistic ideal of the newsman as an objective and authoritative purveyor of facts; and an incident in which he departed from that ideal, with far-reaching consequences for the country and the news business...by the time he retired in 1981, Cronkite was known as “the most trusted man in America,” a superlative that had been confirmed the previous year in a Ladies Home Journal Poll.

But in his own mind--and in the minds of many of his critics and admirers alike--the most important moment in his career came when he departed from the newsman’s role to play editorialist. The occasion was a just-completed reporting trip to Vietnam, where he had reported on the Tet Offensive....

Cronkite’s editorializing made him into part of the story. And Vietnam was not just any story; it was the central political and cultural conflict in America for several years beginning in the late 1960s. By taking sides, Cronkite compromised his role as a newsman....

Judged on his whole career, Cronkite’s reputation for integrity and trustworthiness was well-deserved. He was a great newsman. But his greatness, paradoxically, made the effect of his lapse much more damaging. It sowed confusion among younger reporters about the difference between reporting and commentary.....

Being a “straight shooter” means something quite different to a news reporter than an editorialist. The distinction is analogous to that between a judge deciding a case and a lawyer arguing one...No one doubts that Cronkite was sincere in his opinion about Vietnam, and the argument over its merits is beyond the scope of today’s column. As a reporter, however, he had a duty to stick to the facts and leave opinions to others.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/20/2009 12:36:16 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

He was not much better than Duranty and the blood of millions in Cambodia and Laos and Viet Nam is on his hands.


2 posted on 07/20/2009 12:43:38 PM PDT by blackminorca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
he personified the 20th-century journalistic ideal of the newsman as an objective and authoritative purveyor of facts; and an incident in which he departed from that ideal

He was a lying liberal sack of sh!t. The idea that he only had a single incident of departure from the ideal of an objective news man is delusional at best.

3 posted on 07/20/2009 12:45:45 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (I long for the days when advertisers didn't constantly ask about the health of my genital organs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Cronkite - lifelong traitor receives an award:

Walter Cronkite : “I’m Glad To Sit On The Right Hand Of Satan”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqTwce_ZLDw


4 posted on 07/20/2009 12:45:51 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("A new Dark Ages made all the more terrible and prolonged by the sinister powers of science.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

you got it!!


5 posted on 07/20/2009 12:47:00 PM PDT by bareford101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Yes January 1968 his leftist coward traitor side shown thru.
6 posted on 07/20/2009 12:49:10 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
He was a lying liberal sack of sh!t. The idea that he only had a single incident of departure from the ideal of an objective news man is delusional at best.

Ditto! Good call....

7 posted on 07/20/2009 12:50:45 PM PDT by Niteranger68 (Have you punished an 0bama supporter today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

RIP you POS I want to spit on him like those fing animals did to our GIs coming home better yet piss all over his grave


8 posted on 07/20/2009 12:51:10 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom King of sarcasim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

He couldn’t come on television without my mother yelling liar. He was no more objective than Castro is caring.


9 posted on 07/20/2009 12:51:24 PM PDT by farmer18th (If you preach "too big to let fail," you're also preaching "too small to let succeed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Judged on his whole career, Cronkite’s reputation for integrity and trustworthiness was well-deserved.

It is not simply the lapse into overt editorializing that produces bias and demonstrates lack of integrity.

In reporting news, the opportunity to inject bias is present throughout the process:

- in deciding which "stories" to report, and the time and prominence to be given to each story, and conversely, which events not to report or not to give prominence to as news stories

- in deciding which facts to report and highlight within each story selected for reporting

- in hiring and promoting news producers and reporters and in assigning topics or events for them to cover

and so on. To say that Cronkite's CBS evening news had only this one lapse into bias and that otherwise his show was a rock of integrity is foolish nonsense.

10 posted on 07/20/2009 12:54:15 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

***Yes January 1968 his leftist coward traitor side shown thru. ***

http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Camp/7624/Generals/giap.htm

***By 1968, NVA morale was at it’s lowest point ever. The plans for “Tet” ‘68 was their last desperate attempt to achieve a success, in an effort to boost the NVA morale. When it was over, General Giap and the NVA viewed the Tet ‘68 offensive as a failure, they were on their knees and had prepared to negotiate a surrender.

At that time, there were fewer than 10,000 U.S. casualties, the Vietnam War was about to end, as the NVA was prepared to accept their defeat. Then, they heard Walter Cronkite (former CBS News anchor and correspondent) on TV proclaiming the success of the Tet ‘68 offensive by the communist NVA. ***


11 posted on 07/20/2009 12:54:23 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (La commedia e' finita!. Now it's serious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

He was dead wrong about Tet, and it f**ked us over big time. I despised Cronkite and don’t miss him one bit.


12 posted on 07/20/2009 12:55:21 PM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
You are correct. Either Cronkite was so ignorant about military affairs he couldn't understand what happened, or he just lied.

In fact, Tet destroyed the Viet Cong as an effective military force. Had the NVA withdrawn the war would have been over.

Because of Uncle Walter they changed their minds and decided to stay, fight and wait us out.

13 posted on 07/20/2009 1:01:57 PM PDT by colorado tanker ("Lastly, I'd like to apologize for America's disproportionate response to Pearl Harbor . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“How a great newsman helped undermine his profession’s ethos.”

How great could he have been, then?

Was he great simply because when he talked people tended to believe them? If that’s the standard, no wonder Michael Jackson, Elvis Presley, Michael Jordan, and Tiger Woods are the Greatest Americans Who Ever Lived according to modern American culture.


14 posted on 07/20/2009 1:09:32 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Hey, Cronkite: America *won* the Tet Offensive! That’s right, I said it.

We lost the war, but won every single individual engagement (over a certain number of participants; there were probably instances when two Vietcong got the jump on one or two G.I. Joes.)


15 posted on 07/20/2009 1:12:29 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Landru
I know you won't doubt the veracity of the words of "The Most Trusted Man in America" when he makes his claim to Satan's right hand seat. Still, I don't doubt he must stand in line and wait his turn, as many have vied for the same seat.

On our Northwoods camping trip last week, we made it a point (as always) to fly the American flag at our campsite. From this point forward, we will include the Gadsen flag as well. NWO be damned.
16 posted on 07/20/2009 1:27:51 PM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I hope that B@$t@rd is with Satan as I post this !!


17 posted on 07/20/2009 1:50:43 PM PDT by bestrongbpositive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
“***Yes January 1968 his leftist coward traitor side shown thru. ***

http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Camp/7624/Generals/giap.htm

***By 1968, NVA morale was at it’s lowest point ever. The plans for “Tet” ‘68 was their last desperate attempt to achieve a success, in an effort to boost the NVA morale. When it was over, General Giap and the NVA viewed the Tet ‘68 offensive as a failure, they were on their knees and had prepared to negotiate a surrender.

At that time, there were fewer than 10,000 U.S. casualties, the Vietnam War was about to end, as the NVA was prepared to accept their defeat. Then, they heard Walter Cronkite (former CBS News anchor and correspondent) on TV proclaiming the success of the Tet ‘68 offensive by the communist NVA. ***”

Yes he should have been jailed as a traitor and at least banned from any news media.I shocked the Lefties at lunch when I went on a roll about this filthy Bastard and the 50,000 names he helped put on the Wall.

18 posted on 07/20/2009 1:53:09 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

when he took the credit (rightly or wrongly) for “ending” the Vietnam War, it made all of the little liberal lemmings out there in journalism schools forsake factual reporting and obsessively aspire to “change the world”. This is the root of the problem we face today.


19 posted on 07/20/2009 2:21:14 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

I heard today that Douglas Brinkley is writing a bio of Uncle Walt. According to Mr. Brinkley, in 1965 Uncle Walt said Vietnam was a quagmire. This was 3 years before Tet.


20 posted on 07/20/2009 2:53:03 PM PDT by dominic flandry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson