Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Birthers In The Mainstream
Boston Phoenix ^ | 7/22/09 | Davey Bernstein

Posted on 07/22/2009 8:35:28 AM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: pissant

You said — Once again, NO ONE HERE opposes legislation going forward. Rather, we actively support it. Walk, chew gum.

It’s also very obvious that this is the only thing that is going to *produce results*.... :-)


21 posted on 07/22/2009 8:49:30 AM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Once again the leftist media is concerned about the well-being of the republican party! Well isn’t that interesting and very, very believable!


22 posted on 07/22/2009 8:49:35 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
That video prompted gape-jawed coverage on the blogs and cable news shows (especially MSNBC)

I'd imagine being slack-jawed is a useful trait for certain metrosexual MSNBC anchors.

23 posted on 07/22/2009 8:49:38 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...

~~Another obama warroom hit .... PING!

I’ll bet sure Axelrod & crew put out the
word on their blackberries to their whole
network, and the drones go into overdrive.
Soros might even pay by the word ..


24 posted on 07/22/2009 8:49:55 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I am highly suspicious that there is something wrong with Obama’s BC. BUT, will somebody please come up with a definition of a “natural born citizen?” Do we have a definition anywhere that applies? Does this mean that babies born by Cesarean Section are ineligible to serve as President? Common sense would say “no, it does not mean that”, but we are bereft of common sense these days.

I am proposing these thoughts because it is obvious that this question has NOT been defined legally in regards to the POTUS. There is no uniform procedure for guaranteeing that anyone one the ballot is really eligible. I read elsewhere that the SOS of NJ knowingly allowed a foreign born individual on the ballot representing the Communist Party.

Could we please get some uniform definition and enforcement of our election laws?


25 posted on 07/22/2009 8:50:15 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

Remember, when the Dems and the left are losing on the issue the last lever they usually pull is the “race card.”

This is the lever they are pulling now. Obama knows that he has a very short window of opportunity to pass legislation that will push America over to socialism without being able to come back.

He knows things are coming...


26 posted on 07/22/2009 8:52:50 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Oh one more thing on that..., i.e., that no one opposes this legislation going forward.

There have been many FReepers who have questioned whether putting efforts into this kind of legislation that I’ve been proposing since after the election — is actually a “liberal ploy” (... LOL...) and is also a plan to “change the Constitution” by allowing Obama to stay in office through his term and thus, change the Constitution by “default”.

That idea (along with others who have been similarly opposed) just came up (once again) yesterday... :-)

That’s part of the “Obama Derangement Syndrome” that I talk about which is so evident here with several posters on this issue.


27 posted on 07/22/2009 8:53:27 AM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Well, take it up with them. Not me.


28 posted on 07/22/2009 8:54:29 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Birtherism is much, much more prevalent than most people realize.

Quite true. OTOH, so is "HeadInTheSandism", which is, as we all know, highly prevalent in the species of humanity we call the MSM.


29 posted on 07/22/2009 8:56:15 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You said — Well, take it up with them. Not me.

I do take it up with them, when that pops up.

What I was taking up with you was your assertion that no one (at least here...) opposes this legislation. Actually there are those here on Free Republic who have opposed this kind of legislation, because of the reasons I mentioned (and other reasons, that I have heard, too).

So, it was *that part* that I was taking up with you...


30 posted on 07/22/2009 8:56:46 AM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

“Natural born” has nothing to do with obstetrics. It has to do with whether or not a person was born in this country of two parents who are citizens. It was put into the Constitution because our Founders knew that this country would be a freedom magnet for people from all over the world, and they wanted to make sure that the person who was President would not have any ties - familial, cultural, tribal - to any person or state other than the USA.


31 posted on 07/22/2009 8:56:54 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Those (COLB) are given to non-citizens.

Seconded. And bolded. And other font stuff!

The only reason Bambi even has a COLB is that he was born elsewhere.

32 posted on 07/22/2009 8:57:18 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Obama's new ploy is to reframe the entire argument and to denigrate all of those seeking simple proof that he is legitimately qualified under the guidelines of the U.S. Constitution to serve as president of the United States and Commander and Chief by calling everyone seeking the truth: RACISTS.

Actually, what this may be is proof of what an extremist he is. An extremist will on some personal principle go to great lengths, even spending millions simply in order not to be seen caving to the demands of an opponent.

33 posted on 07/22/2009 8:58:21 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Yeah, their employees probably have that Keep on Truckin’ guy on their cars....


34 posted on 07/22/2009 8:59:30 AM PDT by clintonh8r (General James Mattoon Scott: Where are you now that we need you?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
get the various states to enact a law to *legally require* specific documentation in order for a candidate to be on the ballot. This is the simplest and easiest way to solve this issue...

I agree.

35 posted on 07/22/2009 9:00:48 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Ii have yet to see anyone say they were opposed to the legislation. And I’ve been at this stuff since it first surfaced. Sorry for the mistatement. I’m sure there are people here that would say Reagan is a RINO, so I should never say “NO ONE HERE”.


36 posted on 07/22/2009 9:00:53 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

You said — I am proposing these thoughts because it is obvious that this question has NOT been defined legally in regards to the POTUS. There is no uniform procedure for guaranteeing that anyone one the ballot is really eligible.

You’re right on that one. It’s not required by law for any candidate to show his birth certificate. I mean, some have, in order to qwell a political storm, but not out of a “legal requirement”.

All candidates have had to do in the past was simply to swear and sign a statement that they are qualified. That’s all it has taken in the past and that’s the *big loophole* in this issue.

That’s why I’ve said that the thing states should do is enact legislation for each state requiring by law that a candidate show specific documentation or else they cannot be on the ballot.

Oklahoma, Arizona and Missouri was working on that one. Oklahoma’s failed this legislative session and I’ll be working on getting it through in the next legislative session...


37 posted on 07/22/2009 9:01:16 AM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Let's start with a Form I-9
38 posted on 07/22/2009 9:01:46 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I was talking about “here” (you’ll note that I put that in there) and it was yesterday that this surfaced again, in one of the posts on the Obama Birth Certificate Issue. It was put in such a way that it wasn’t a good idea to pursue this because it would allow Obama to “change the Constitution by default” in allowing him to remain in office for his term. Thus it was presented as a kind of “sidelining” issue and a way to change the Constitution by default....

That’s the Obama Derangement Syndrome for you, right here on Free Republic with some posters.

I’m also waiting for someone to tell me that all it takes to remove Obama from office right now — is for some judge to issue an order to a U.S. Marshal and he will walk into the Oval Office, arrest and handcuff Obama, and perp-walk him outside the White House and put him in jail... LOL...

Any Obama Derangement Syndrome takers on that one? :-)


39 posted on 07/22/2009 9:05:45 AM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pissant
As everyone knows the Obamamesiah was born on Hawaii in two hospitals at the same time.
40 posted on 07/22/2009 9:05:53 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson