Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: A slippery slope from gov't health to euthanasia
Politico ^ | Aug 9, 2009 | Erika Lovley

Posted on 08/09/2009 12:28:16 PM PDT by SmartInsight

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: SmartInsight

howard dean is a deluded, demented psychopath. gingrich, apparently, is the master of understatement. “Slippery slope” indeed. Like the McDonald’s menu is a “slippery slope” to quarter-pounders with cheese.


21 posted on 08/09/2009 2:20:55 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (The revolution IS being televised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
You're exactly right: we already passed the 'slippery slope' stage quite a way back on the road, particularly if we are to believe everything of which the pro-big government press has been trying to persuade us for years & irrespective of what that same press is suddenly trying to convince us of now.

The establishment press has promoted the euthanasia crowd's viewpoint so energetically for the last ten years, often portraying the Jack Kervorkians of the world as sympathetic figures fighting the good, just & compassionate fight for humanity.

Time and again we've been told by the leftists' flunkies in the press that a growing number of Americans agree with the idea that doctors and others should be able to unilaterally decide for themselves when to pull the plug on other citizens.

And yet now we're supposed to take their word that the same "growing American consensus" of people advocating for euthanasia would never allow the possibility of the same thing being perpetrated against us when government (which itself makes policy decisions in accordance with - ta da ! - the whims of democratic majority consensus) seizes control of the plug?

Media shills for the left have to decide here which one of these contentions which it's been peddling to us for years now is true:

1)The only people left in America who could possibly believe that the 'compassionate' euthanasia of other citizens under curcumstances of liberals' own enlightened determination is not a good thing are a dwindling band of hopelessly irrational troglodytes & religious nuts or

2) A health care system operated by the government would never target its own citizens for euthanasia, even according to the enlightened determination of pro-euthanasia liberals such as those for whom the press has been working so hard to try to convince the rest of us they actually have the full weight of momentum of public opinion on their side now.

Those two premises are laughably self-contradictory.

22 posted on 08/09/2009 3:00:51 PM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: leilani

http://unitedcitizen.blogspot.com/


23 posted on 08/09/2009 3:14:09 PM PDT by GeronL (Guilty of the crime of deviationism.http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson