Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI director outraged by Lockerbie bomber release (Obama on release: "highly objectionable"
AP ^ | 22 SEP 2009 | AP

Posted on 08/22/2009 12:35:19 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet

"Your action," he wrote MacAskill, "makes a mockery of the grief of the families who lost their own on December 21, 1988. You could not have spent much time with the families, certainly not as much time as others involved in the investigation and prosecution."

He ended the Lockerbie letter with a frustrated question: "Where, I ask, is the justice?"

President Barack Obama on Friday called the elaborate homecoming in Libya for the freed bomber "highly objectionable."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: almegrahi; fbi; highlyobjectionable; lockerbie; macaskill; murder; objectionable; scotland; tm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: Candor7
I'd make the argument that since that a/c was in flight, it was sovereign US territory, and he could still be brought to the US for murder charges, for killing 259 people on a US aircraft.
81 posted on 08/22/2009 10:01:24 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Does "We All Weed Up" Indicate Obama Is Now Channeling Bob Marley?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
Obama feels the release was “highly objectionable.”

Too bad he didn't “object” loud enough or long enough to the UK government before the release.

Obama feels the release was “highly objectionable.”

Gee, I wonder how the families of 259 murdered passengers and crew feel.

82 posted on 08/22/2009 10:04:37 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Does "We All Weed Up" Indicate Obama Is Now Channeling Bob Marley?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
You can guarantee this raghead will be miraculously healed by allah and return to the business of killing Americans. Instead of dropping a 2,000 lb of him and his closest friends, save the money and send in a sniper. Help him go the land of 72 (gay and ugly) virgins and allah a little faster with a little help from our friends.
83 posted on 08/22/2009 10:37:32 PM PDT by antiunion person (PALIN for PRESIDENT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winged Hussar

The U.S. is within its rights to have this terrorist hunted down and either killed or captured.

(1) There is no statute of limitations on murder.
(2) The terrorist never faced trial in a U.S. court so double jeopardy does not apply. He can be prosecuted, convicted, and sent to a little cell in a Supermax prison to live out whatever is left of his worthless life.
(3) As far as I know (not legal advice), deadly force can be used to apprehend a murder suspect who won’t surrender to law enforcement. That means U.S. authorities can and should kill him if they can’t capture him.


unfortunately it´s not that simple.
1. Only because in the US there is no statue of limitations on murder does not nessersary mean that every other country in this world has the same law.
2. There would have been no legal way to put him on trial in a regular cort in the US because he never commited any crime on US soil. As bizzare as this may sound but killing people in generall isn´t even illegal at all. It´s the law of the counry where you commit it which makes it illegal or not. Just a example someone who legal shoots a burgler in texas may would have been (again total legal) convicted for murder some where else.
3. Yeah sounds nice but would not be a good Idea.
Because if you kill someone in a foreign country it´s just simple a crime called murder (the law does not care who you kill) and if they catch you you will find your self soon (total legal) in a prison cell for a least a very very long time. btw. Lets assume you have killed this terrorist. (most people would not have a problem with this true) but where do you stop? Kill the inocent police officer you may encounter (who only does his job to hunt down a killer) too to get this bastard? btw. if catched this would be a political nightmare for the government.


84 posted on 08/22/2009 11:16:10 PM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
what would you have liked for him to do?

Reagan would have had American jets intercept the plane carrying this scum, and brought him to the U.S. for trial. If he died in custody during the process, so be it.

85 posted on 08/23/2009 1:20:15 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Get rid of the dirty moderates. Get rid of them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

So in other words the UK is filled with a bunch of nazi terrorist supporters? Only Nazi POS child molesting terror supporters believe he was framed.


86 posted on 08/23/2009 1:31:34 AM PDT by rexgrossmansonlyfan (Obama, Blagojevich, Stroger and Daley when Daley is the least corrupt of a group you have issues!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Not being a child raping terror supporter like everyone who believes this is what a bunch of crap.

Everyone who believes this crap deserves to get on a plane with the worthless POS.


87 posted on 08/23/2009 1:36:41 AM PDT by rexgrossmansonlyfan (Obama, Blagojevich, Stroger and Daley when Daley is the least corrupt of a group you have issues!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

A bomb should be dropped on all the people that announce they love Bin Laden by supporting this terrorist POS.


88 posted on 08/23/2009 1:40:43 AM PDT by rexgrossmansonlyfan (Obama, Blagojevich, Stroger and Daley when Daley is the least corrupt of a group you have issues!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: japaneseghost

Another terror supporter takes the side of the bomber.

We should gather all the subhuman trash who support this theory and drop a bomb on them. They were celebrating the day this happened. 180 people died and these people were out celebrating.

They are just as much terrorists as this recently freed guy.

They mark September 11th as a day of joy.


89 posted on 08/23/2009 1:43:28 AM PDT by rexgrossmansonlyfan (Obama, Blagojevich, Stroger and Daley when Daley is the least corrupt of a group you have issues!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

This is selective “compassion” ie FAKE COMPASSION


90 posted on 08/23/2009 2:37:13 AM PDT by Ulysse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Bush was not always right!
Far from that!
But BUSH made some good things and he tried at least and he was not a libtard-fascist wannabe muslim...

Case closed.Now it’s a mater of OBAMA....And he could have done much more against that mess concerning Scotland and Lybia.But obviously he doesn’t want to...


91 posted on 08/23/2009 2:46:58 AM PDT by Ulysse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Deb

William Wallace come back!

He has probably some descendants...Thanks


92 posted on 08/23/2009 3:05:14 AM PDT by Ulysse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rexgrossmansonlyfan

You are falling prey to the common delusion that the more horrible the crime is the more likely the accused is to have been the one who committed it. So for the worst crimes we should just skip the trial and go straight to the execution. This, of course, is the attitude that led people to lynchings. They were trying to express their outrage, a perfectly understandable reaction.

However, when a child is raped and murdered, someone committed the crime. This does not in and of itself mean the accused, John Smith, did it.

The doubts and discrepancies as to whether the gentleman in question was actually guilty have not been reported in this country, so it’s not surprising few Americans are aware of them. They therefore assume the only issue involved here is a cave-in to Muslim pressure.

It is at least as likely he was released so the British government would not have to face up to a second appeal, which it is widely believed would demonstrate they had intentionally framed a man they knew to be innocent of this particular crime, although probably a bad guy in the abstract. Or that they at least fudged the evidence to nail down a conviction of someone they believed guilty anyway.

The Brits were under intense pressure to “solve” this crime and police forces and governments have been known to do similar things in the past.

I’m agnostic on the issue, but people who I respect and who know a lot more about it than I do are not convinced he was guilty.

What I will never understand is the mindset of those who don’t really care whether the convicted person is guilty or not. All they care about is that someone is being punished. This of course means that if the person in jail is not the guilty party, those who actually did commit the crime continue to walk free.


93 posted on 08/23/2009 3:51:22 AM PDT by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

Dang! Is English a second language for you?


94 posted on 08/23/2009 4:42:45 AM PDT by houeto (liberals v. conservatives = irreconcilable differences..."It's time to part the sheets!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Agreed.
95 posted on 08/23/2009 4:58:17 AM PDT by Candor7 (The weapons of choice against fascism are ridicule ,derision ,truth. (member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: houeto

yes. As every body can see (i guess all the typing errors and the simple grammar i´m using leaves no doubt) that english is not my mother tounge.


96 posted on 08/23/2009 5:29:03 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
“utterly outraged” in lieu of “highly objectionable.”

bfd. Good lord. This is what we've devolved to? I'm outraged at the lack of outrage due to the overuse of the term 'outrage.'

97 posted on 08/23/2009 6:17:15 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Only a child raping terror supporter believes this guy is innocent.

You’re falling prey to your friends in AL Queda and their propganda.

Just like some people believe child rape is okay some people believe this guy is innocent. The same kind of people believe both.


98 posted on 08/23/2009 7:46:09 AM PDT by rexgrossmansonlyfan (Obama, Blagojevich, Stroger and Daley when Daley is the least corrupt of a group you have issues!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: rexgrossmansonlyfan
Only a child raping terror supporter believes this guy is innocent.

Very odd line of reasoning. I didn't say he's innocent, BTW, I stated that a lot of people do so believe. This is indisputably accurate.

David Frum, not exactly a liberal although not always someone I agree with, included this list of them in his column today.

"Among those who support the Iran-did-it theory are: (i) former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon; (ii) Robert Baer, the CIA official who worked directly on the Lockerbie case; (iii) Hans Koechler, the UN Security Council observer at al-Megrahi's trial; (iv) Robert Black, the Scottish lawyer who organized the trial proceedings; (v) Dr. Jim Swire, the spokesman for the families of British Lockerbie victims who lost his own daughter aboard Pan Am Flight 103; and (vi) David Horovitz, editor of the Jerusalem Post.

Are all of them child raping terror supporters?

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/08/22/david-frum-why-so-little-outcry-from-washington-on-al-megrahi.aspx

99 posted on 08/23/2009 7:56:25 AM PDT by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Candor7; neutronsgalore
You are so right. We should be cutting off diplomatic ties with Libya, and telling the government of Scotland that all goods imported to the USA from Scotland, including whiskey,will have a 50% tariff.

Make that a 270% tariff, for the 270 victims.
100 posted on 08/23/2009 11:33:26 AM PDT by fallujah-nuker (America needs more SAC and less empty sacs from Goldman-Sachs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson