Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breath test to detect lung cancer
UK Press via Google News ^ | August 30, 2009

Posted on 08/31/2009 10:10:29 AM PDT by Schnucki

Patients with suspected lung cancer could in future be breathalysed to check if they have the disease.

Scientists have developed a sensor that can quickly detect lung cancer molecules on the breath.

They believe the technology could lead to cheap, portable breath-test devices with the potential to save large numbers of lives by spotting cancer early.

The lung cancer biomarkers were found by comparing breath samples from 40 diagnosed patients and 56 healthy individuals.

From the results, the researchers identified 42 "volatile organic compounds" (VOCs) present in the breath of 83% of cancer patients but fewer than 83% of healthy volunteers.

Four of the most reliable were used to develop a nine-sensor array made from tiny gold particles coated with reactive chemicals sensitive to the compounds.

Exposed to the VOCs, the sensors generated an electrical signal that produced a distinctive trace pattern.

In tests the device easily distinguished simulated "healthy" and "cancerous" breath made from artificial compound mixtures.

The Israeli scientists led by Dr Hossam Haick, from the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, outline the research in the journal Nature Nanotechnology.

They wrote: "Our results show great promise for fast, easy and cost-effective diagnosis and screening of lung cancer."

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: health; lungcancer; medicine; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Learned about this on Slashdot.
1 posted on 08/31/2009 10:10:29 AM PDT by Schnucki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Cool. But why not just sniff for tobacco-breath?


2 posted on 08/31/2009 10:12:30 AM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Cheney/Palin 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

The natural spin off from this technology will be a colon cancer detector that you fart into.


3 posted on 08/31/2009 10:13:05 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

Hahaha!

Seriously, I wonder if part of the smell is tobacco residue.


4 posted on 08/31/2009 10:14:19 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Proud Sarah-Bot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

This a UK discovery? If so, look for it to be heralded soon as the success of socialized medicine!


5 posted on 08/31/2009 10:15:08 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Control the teleprompter, control the agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

I think I’ve read that specially trained dogs can do the same thing.


6 posted on 08/31/2009 10:16:28 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma (Al Franken--the face of the third-party voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Maybe not as silly as it sounds. I bet people would prefer that over the annoyance of a conventional colonoscopy. Instead of having to purge with a laxative, you’d just eat some beans the day before the test.


7 posted on 08/31/2009 10:16:55 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Proud Sarah-Bot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Actually, Israel. British press.


8 posted on 08/31/2009 10:17:33 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Proud Sarah-Bot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
"From the results, the researchers identified 42 "volatile organic compounds" (VOCs) present in the breath of 83% of cancer patients but fewer than 83% of healthy volunteers."

Does that sentence tell us anything? The way it's worded, the VOCs could be present in 82.999% of healthy volunteers. One is left to assume that the difference between the healthy and unhealthy groups is much larger. What is the actual percentage in healthy volunteers?

If a quick, cheap, and easy test for lung cancer is developed; that would be a great thing. Great enough that it deserves a decent report, by someone who possesses basic numeracy skills.
9 posted on 08/31/2009 10:19:26 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

I’ve read about Golden Retrievers being used to detect cancer.


10 posted on 08/31/2009 10:26:23 AM PDT by stuartcr (If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Glad to know I wasn’t the only one left scratching my head by that sentence.


11 posted on 08/31/2009 10:29:42 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

“They believe the technology could lead to cheap, portable breath-test devices with the potential to save large numbers of lives by spotting cancer early.”....

O.K......So it’s spotted early. NOW you get to wait in line for some government official to decide if you’re life is valuable enough to save!.....


12 posted on 08/31/2009 10:35:22 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Surely a much smaller number went before the second percent sign.


13 posted on 08/31/2009 10:35:24 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Proud Sarah-Bot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

LOL!!


14 posted on 08/31/2009 10:35:52 AM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Israel. I-S-R-A-E-L. They don’t have that problem there. This is a British newspaper not a British medical journal!


15 posted on 08/31/2009 10:36:41 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Proud Sarah-Bot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Here is an article about a company in the good old USA with the same idea — article from 2005 :-)

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-08-21-breath-test_x.htm


16 posted on 08/31/2009 10:44:25 AM PDT by fred2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I’m assuming the technology would be available here....


17 posted on 08/31/2009 10:44:32 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
I’ve read about Golden Retrievers being used to detect cancer.

So look out if they sniff your crotch.

18 posted on 08/31/2009 10:44:46 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
That's what we're left to assume. But what was that number? Why not just report it, instead of using an equal amount of space to be completely vague?
19 posted on 08/31/2009 10:45:10 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
Good Luck getting into a UK hospital if you test Positive, the folks will be PRIORITIZED. If someone of a lower Age tests positive, they will Bump you back.

This is what Obama/Kennedy Care will do for you; taking the Air out of Care as it did Mary Jo K.

20 posted on 08/31/2009 10:48:45 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson