This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 09/18/2009 6:21:53 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Duplicate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2343263/posts |
Posted on 09/18/2009 4:11:24 PM PDT by unspun
Well actually she might be doing well to still be an attorney.
Bar complaints can be very troubling for attorneys especially if they are accompanied by court imposed sanctions. The California Bar might very well limit her ability to practice and the sanctions and awards of attorney fees as a result of her imcompentance are sure to increase the number a clients moving against her.
Updated over at I.O.:
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2009/09/cpt-connie-rhodes-to-file-complaint.html
Today’s letter to Judge Land, by plaintiff Cpt. Connie M. Rhodes, MD:
[Edit: or is it? Based on a tip, check out the signature line. Now, someone may sign her name and underline it, as I regarded it, in passing, but it appears to be a pre-printed line. That in turn appears to make the signature a photocopy, which appears to make the letter appear to be a forgery. Yet more drama and disruption. Does someone have something to hide?]
http://static.mgnetwork.com/rbl/pdf/birther_letter.pdf
Plus, see Judge Land’s orders and the reasons for his punitive measures against Dr. Taitz:
http://static.mgnetwork.com/rbl/pdf/rhodes_macdonald_order.pdf
The source for this story is WRBL TV in Columbia, Georgia: “$10,000 Sanction Proposed Against ‘Birther’ Lawyer.” They have been asked about this letter and they are trying to track it down. More to come.
This is the point where I’m asking admin to put a question mark at the end of the title.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.