Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarian Party throws Reagan under the bus
North Star National ^ | October 2nd, 2009

Posted on 10/02/2009 1:12:54 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last
To: a fool in paradise

That was 13 minutes ago. Better set a new deadline. Remember: 5% of the vote!


21 posted on 10/02/2009 1:36:53 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; Jim Robinson

As Jim has another FReepathon underway... and as I always do, I call on him to make a public statement either for or against FR Libertarians and what they post here on his website.

If he would only post a definitive statement either way, I would send $100 to the Freepathon.

He never does, and so I never do.

I suspect Jim cannot afford to pi$$ off the Libs who contribute here.

So nothing is ever officially said.


22 posted on 10/02/2009 1:36:55 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I am Legend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

That was 13 minutes ago. Better set a new deadline. Remember: 5% of the vote!


23 posted on 10/02/2009 1:37:03 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TheLurkerX
Not all of us. I just want the federal government to keep their damn hands off of my rights, my pocketbook, and my family, and go back to doing what they’re supposed to, based on their Constitutional powers.

Noble ideals, but you've still grouped yourself in with a confused lot with collectively limited intelligence.

24 posted on 10/02/2009 1:40:12 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheLurkerX
Not all of us. I just want the federal government to keep their damn hands off of my rights, my pocketbook, and my family, and go back to doing what they’re supposed to, based on their Constitutional powers.

Noble ideals, but you've still grouped yourself in with a confused lot with collectively limited intelligence.

25 posted on 10/02/2009 1:40:13 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

Honestly, I haven’t, most of the time. Since this is realistically a 2 party system, I have voted Republican most of the time. I tried going with Perot, and we got Clinton because of it. I voted for Bush, twice. I saw no hope of beating Obama in Kentucky, so I voted Libertarian in the last election. In 2010, and in 2012, I’ll probably vote Republican again, in the hope that people will be so sick of O by then, that they’ll vote the other way. I have my personal wishes and ideals, but I’m a realist.


26 posted on 10/02/2009 1:40:22 PM PDT by TheLurkerX (If you want renewable energy, I'm sure the founding fathers are spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
27 posted on 10/02/2009 1:40:36 PM PDT by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain OnTheDress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
I make no defense of this statement, and longtime members know this list is not a 'bot' for the Libertarian Party...this is a libertarian ping list. So, I'm just putting it out there.

Reagan was not wholly perfect in a libertarian sense, but he is probably the closest thing to a small government conservative that we have seen come out of the GOP in 50 years.




Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
(View past Libertarian pings here)
28 posted on 10/02/2009 1:41:21 PM PDT by bamahead (Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
The Libertarian Party’s chairman said that the Republican Party’s hero “was not serious about cutting the size of government.”

That statement is quite true. The size of government GREW under Reagan...& don't blame the Dim Congress that The Gipper had to deal w/, 'cuz (& to answer your question, GeronL), Reagan had the constitutional authority to veto bills by Congress but DIDN'T for the most part. The simple fact that he signed those bills into law proves he was no friend to the Constitution or limited government.

29 posted on 10/02/2009 1:43:05 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
As Jim has another FReepathon underway... and as I always do, I call on him to make a public statement either for or against FR Libertarians and what they post here on his website.

I'll double that, if he also says something about anti-catholic bigotry on this website, and gives us a more detailed accounting of where these "donations" are going. I can name 20 people who would get in line right behind me.

30 posted on 10/02/2009 1:43:28 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dr_who

4:20 is like beer-thirty for dopers


31 posted on 10/02/2009 1:44:39 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
When is the Libertarian Party going to get serious about becoming a viable political party?

When are so-called "conservatives" going to get serious about electing candidates who are sincere about cutting the size of government...& stop insulting the few Members of Congress who are working night & day to do just that?

32 posted on 10/02/2009 1:46:28 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Aren’t any of y’all capable of distinguishing between libertarianism and the Libertarian party?


33 posted on 10/02/2009 1:48:00 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Why not "interpret" your tax returns like the Supreme Court "interprets" the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

“Libertarian Party throws Reagan under the bus.”

That’s just not possible.

President Ronald Reagan was too great of man to be thrown under ANY bus.
That was true then, it is true now and it will forever be true.


34 posted on 10/02/2009 1:48:03 PM PDT by Gator113 (Obamba, Reid, Pelosi, the socialist triad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who; Responsibility2nd; iowamark; grey_whiskers; Deb; oneamericanvoice

I forgot to add that my experience has told me that the typical incentive for a person becoming a libertarian is that his or her own life would be less complicated if marijuana was legalized. The rest of the window dressing is there only to lend credibility to the argument. Sure, there are some confused idealists out there and here on FR. But when 99% of the libertarians I’ve come across (and it numbers in the thousands at this point) are honest, it started with pot, and it went from there. Nice legacy.


35 posted on 10/02/2009 1:48:29 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Hey, I’m half libertarian. The half the doesn’t go along with liberalism.


36 posted on 10/02/2009 1:49:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jimrobfr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Thanks for saying what may others think.

How is it that Libertarians who post on FR call it boogie man thinking to be concerned abut Ahmadinejad and his nuclear weapons, that Israel is the problem, that Obama is better than an 80% conservative.

Their talking points can be seen at DU, KOS and FR


37 posted on 10/02/2009 1:51:51 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

“Thrown under the bus.” Is a sports term. I roughly translates to “stabbed him in the back.” But the essential thing is that it can only be done to a member of your own team, one who rides the bus with you.

Ronald Reagan was many things in his life, but the only one we put on a pedastel was the President. As president, he actively opposed liberatarian ideas and ideals. In other words, he was never on their “team,” so they can’t throw him under the bus.


38 posted on 10/02/2009 1:51:57 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The LIBERALtarian Party will never amount to anything.

No one is going to vote for a party that is open borders, pro-illegal alien, weak on national security, and so ate-up on Free Trade that they praise Chairman Mao over George Washington.

Blaming Reagan for Big Government can be added now to that list. Great work, LIBS


39 posted on 10/02/2009 1:52:05 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (The Return of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

We will drink no wine before it’s time....it’s time!


40 posted on 10/02/2009 1:52:16 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson