Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liz Cheney Running for President in 2012?
RightPundits ^ | 11.21.09 | Ellie Velinska

Posted on 11/21/2009 12:58:19 PM PST by rface

When Liz Cheney said “Think Cheney 2012″ on the last FOX News Sunday with Chris Wallace – the panel in the studio and lame stream media later assumed she was talking about her father – former VP Dick Cheney. Everybody took the bait – and got caught in… sexism. She did not say “Think Dick Cheney 2012”. It never occurred to the Good Ol’ Boys in the media that Liz Cheney was hinting about a possible run of a Cheney in 2012… like in “Liz Cheney 2012″. Why not? The lady is extremely smart and has a whooping resume that tops Hillary and Sarah if you put them together. Let’s take a look at who Liz Cheney really is .

Education: Bachelor’s degree from Colorado College. Senior thesis: “The Evolution of Presidential War Powers,” in 1988. J.D. degree from the University of Chicago Law School in 1996, having also taken courses in Middle Eastern history at the Oriental Institute.

Seems to me she was looking into the Presidency ever since college.

.

So what is Liz Cheney doing now, you sexists? Is she baking cookies? May be, but she also is running a non-profit 501(c)4 organization, Keep America Safe. The purpose of the group is to support and defend policies of the Bush/Cheney administration which they believe will keep America safe.

Liz Cheney threw a major trial balloon on a major political show on a major network and nobody noticed? Take the challenge you guys! “Think Cheney 2012 – Think Liz!”

(Excerpt) Read more at rightpundits.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; cheney2012; lizcheney; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
interesting.........

see previous FR post:

Liz Cheney suggests Cheney presidential ticket in 2012

1 posted on 11/21/2009 12:58:20 PM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rface

Against Sarah? Not a chance.


2 posted on 11/21/2009 1:00:38 PM PST by Libloather (Tea totaler, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Let’s make it Palin-Cheney.

The All American All Girl ticket.


3 posted on 11/21/2009 1:02:12 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

How about Palin/Chaney?


4 posted on 11/21/2009 1:02:51 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rface

Geez, it’s like getting hit with a wet spit ball.
I’ll have to hear a lot more before I can get to excited about this.


5 posted on 11/21/2009 1:03:05 PM PST by 1776 Reborn (Test kids and politicians (bigger idiots) on the Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Whhas a whooping resume that tops Hillary and Sarah if you put them together

As much as I like Ms Cheney, the above statement is not true.

Still I love the notion of her running.

6 posted on 11/21/2009 1:04:21 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Demand Constitutionality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Not another Bush or Bush associate. I wouldn't be surprised if they try to push a Cheney on us since it looks like their Jeb plan ain't gonna work out.
7 posted on 11/21/2009 1:08:02 PM PST by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

I not one to pan anybody for inexperience but I don’t believe that Liz has run for any elected office to date.

Running for office is a skill in itself. One of the reasons I support Sarah is I know that she deserves a 10 for her talent on the campaign trail. That cannot be underestimated or discounted.

I think Liz should run for a House seat federally or state-wide first.


8 posted on 11/21/2009 1:09:08 PM PST by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

What about Bachmann?


9 posted on 11/21/2009 1:13:17 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rface
Sarah hasn't said she's running in 2012. Cheney and Bachmann? Bachmann and Cheney? Personally, Bachmann as Speaker of the House sends chills all up and down my spine. LOL. I'm kidding. But it does bring a smile to my face.


10 posted on 11/21/2009 1:13:20 PM PST by HighlyOpinionated (Abortion-Euthanasia kills the very people for whom Social Justice is needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
In my humble opinion, I don't believe her people would pick Palin as a running mate because they would believe two women would be just a little over the top. On the other hand, leaving Palin out would be a big mistake. This is a unique situation. So, I think IF she did run it would be her against Palin in the Primaries (and a bunch of men Republicans too) Right now I would choose Sarah but will see how this develops in the future.
11 posted on 11/21/2009 1:15:11 PM PST by fish hawk (It's sad that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom. Isaac Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

I think we might see her take on Jim Webb in 2012. Would be great!


12 posted on 11/21/2009 1:16:54 PM PST by freespirited (Liberals are only liberal about sex & drugs. Otherwise, they want to control your life. --DHorowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
I don't care how articulate she is, conservatives are not going to support Liz Cheney.

At a time when conservatives are craving for someone who has spent their formative years and career outside of Washington, Liz has NO real-world background or executive experience; she is a lawyer who worked on behalf of internationalists and she has worked in the state department. In other words, she's a government bureaucrat/lawyer.

Liz also worked with the Romney campaign.

The ugly truth here is that she'll destroy Palin in a debate, and that what makes it sad, because (assuming this is all true) she is clearly putting her ego ahead of what's good for the nation. Her running for President will just split conservatives and then we'll get a chump like Huckabee/Pawlenty/Romney as the disastrous result.

Liz would be an excellent Secretary of State - and that's pretty much it. I wouldn't even want her for VP because her last name will just turn off independents who remember her father tied with Bush.

I believe the promotion of Liz is from Republican insiders turned off by Palin.

13 posted on 11/21/2009 1:17:40 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (10 YEARS OF FREEPING! HAPPY ANNIVERSARY EEE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

I don’t know a lot about Bachmann. I know I should. Tell me more.


14 posted on 11/21/2009 1:19:35 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rface
There is nothing that Liz Cheney has said or done that proves she is anything beyond (more conservative) than her globalist, elitest, RINO predecessors, ie; GW Bush, her Dad, Pappa Bush, Jeb, etc.

If it means more of the same RINO compassionate conservatism (big gubmint) Liz Cheney can take a hike.

I'll stick with Sarah.

15 posted on 11/21/2009 1:21:42 PM PST by Ranger Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I’m certainly not turned off by Palin but I’m more impressed when I hear Liz speak.


16 posted on 11/21/2009 1:21:47 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rface

So a member of the Romney campaign who has never run for office before and can’t win her first race which would be for President of the United States, may run anyway?

That would sure muddy the waters for Romney’s only real competition, the female, Governor Palin.


17 posted on 11/21/2009 1:25:04 PM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno
One of the reasons I support Sarah is I know that she deserves a 10 for her talent on the campaign trail.

Governor Palin has 16 years of political experience working with the people at the local, state, and federal level.

Liz Cheney is a bureaucrat/internationalist/corporate lawyer.

Palin is far more qualified to be President than Cheney, whose background suggests she would do well in an appointed role. Now I'm not saying that Cheney should be prevented from running for President, and given Palin's nature she'll probably step aside and even support her. But with the political situation we're in, now's not the time to choose someone from the beltway.

I trust that Cheney will do the right thing here, and recognize that Palin has unconditional grassroots support who won't consider any other candidate.

18 posted on 11/21/2009 1:26:38 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (10 YEARS OF FREEPING! HAPPY ANNIVERSARY EEE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
I’m certainly not turned off by Palin but I’m more impressed when I hear Liz speak.

Liz is very articulate and would be an asset in any administration.

19 posted on 11/21/2009 1:27:36 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (10 YEARS OF FREEPING! HAPPY ANNIVERSARY EEE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Liz for Sarah’s White House Chief of Staff!


20 posted on 11/21/2009 1:29:30 PM PST by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson