So......does this mean we’re not all gonna die?? ;^)
bttt
So the tree ring data after 1960 doesn’t match real temperature measurements. But apparently that didn’t stop these guys from using tree ring data as a source of global temperatures for before and after 1960. A reasonable person would question the usefulness of tree rings in determining global temperatures, since the period for which we have the most real data does not correlate well.
But if you’re a global warming fanatic, the tactic is to continue to use the tree ring data, and just falsify the post-1960 tree ring data by substituting real temperature measurements. Obviously, the older tree ring data is useful to them in making some other point. Perhaps making the medieval warming period disappear?
If I understand correctly what’s going on here, these guys need to be drummed out of the science community. And they should go to jail. The social impact of these liars has been tremendous. Hopefully, Copenhagen is a dead meeting now.
No. It's time to dissolve the IPCC and stop funding every organization that is promoting AGW. The game's over.
I especially enjoyed the “fudge factor.” That’s a surefire way to make a graph look the way it should when the data won’t cooperate.
Yeah, I think I can understand that. It's like when a Mafia loan shark comes to collect the “vig” and says he's going to break legs. What he really means is that a strongly worded letter is going to be sent to the credit bureau.
Nothing untoward, eh?
Thank you very much for the post. I finally get to resurrect all of my years of F77 education. There is much more in this code that I am slugging through. BTTT!
btt
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=1433905#1433905
Watch this space:
This?
"Does this mean we can have our incandescent light bulbs back?"
...is going to become the rallying cry that helps drag this swindle into the light of day.
And yes, it is a swindle- a fraud-- a deliberately designed construct intended to cheat you out of things you hold dear-- money, prosperity, freedom... and a few other things, as well.
...Watch this space...
I'm keeping a running file ( always updated ) on this fraud and scandal:
"Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked [epic fraud?]"
Click the picture:
They’re had. Even though there will be die hard warmers, including that SOB in office, the electorate is catching on. I want every school who insisted on showing the Goreacle’s crockumentary to review this material. Spread the word.
Perhaps CRU's next major publication should be entitled "The CRU Cookbook: 100 Fudged Recipes That Will Warm Your World."
Petition the Law Makers to Stop this Scam
Its time to put this rest
The IPCC did their best
But no one is buying their BS
CO2 Lags Temperature
The ice has shown
The Hot Spot in the Atmosphere ran off with the Heat in the Oceans
And cant be found
Hockey Stick is Broken and the MWP is UP Side Down
The 60s were warmer than 2009. The trend line is against us The Team thundered
Then they sliced and diced until its under.
They said the debate was closed.
And they control the Journals you know
They hid the data with a frown.
If found out, The Team goes down
The Teams goose cooked like they cooked the Books.
Theyre no better than the Eron Crooks.
Theyll say they did it for prestige and pride
And, of course, a big slice of the money pie
So, make your case CO2, that Evil Gas, Rules the Climate if you can
Or declare CO2 a non pollutant
And take it out of EPAs Hand
Petition the Law Makers to Stop this Scam
I’ve read on this very website, within the last two years, that the computer models are flawed. Now we have incontrovertible proof.
(You who search for my stuff, and you know who you are: Be sure to read this.)
ML/NJ
The things in this American Thinker piece are either facts or they are not. It's pretty easy to see why so many people are able to live in an alternate reality with their smug attitudes of superiority when they continue to trust the NYT to deliver the news to them.
I did a search just at nytimes.com for CRU. Several articles from past days do show up. All except two appear to be associated with "blogs." Maybe these other two were in the printed paper during past days, but if they were my guess is that they were buried someplace were a newsreader might likely miss them.
ML/NJ
Has anyone noticed that wikipedia is pretty much devoid of mention of the CRU file release? No mention of it on the current “Hadley Centre” page. After being put in with a reference it was edited out. Ditto for Michael Mann’s page. The page “Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research File Release Incident” has been deleted altogether. Phil Jones’ page does mention it, but downplays it at the same time.
hide the decline, hide the incident, hide the truth.
This Day in History November 24,1871 National Rifle Association organized in New York City
NRA Fights Back Against Bloomberg's Gun Control Coalition
Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.