1 posted on
12/31/2009 4:45:43 AM PST by
saganite
To: saganite
Translation: We’ll take the raw data, throw it out, and give you data that shows warming. And we’ll do it with FEELING. And we’ll do it with CONSENSUS!
2 posted on
12/31/2009 4:47:23 AM PST by
samtheman
To: saganite; FreedomPoster; carolinablonde; proud_yank; bamahead; Normandy; SteamShovel; ...
3 posted on
12/31/2009 4:47:40 AM PST by
steelyourfaith
(Freedom from fat cat greedy Big Government tyranny IS a Right ... It IS the Constitution.)
To: saganite
In addition, the cool global temperatures during the past decade But AP told us months ago this didn't happen.
4 posted on
12/31/2009 4:48:59 AM PST by
gusopol3
To: saganite
Consensus is why Pluto is no longer a planet. It doesn’t mean that the reality of Pluto has changed, only that they say it has.
5 posted on
12/31/2009 4:51:06 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: saganite
More idiocy from the idiots and more lunacy from the lunatics.
Just another day in “science.” Proving once again that no human endeavor is free from human corruption.
To: saganite
Backtracking at the speed of heat! Well, not really. There’s less of that these days. We’re getting a taste of real winter here this weekend.
7 posted on
12/31/2009 4:52:15 AM PST by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: saganite
The way these guys perform science is similar to how people find the face of Elvis on a piece of burnt toast.
To: saganite
As shown in
Caught Green-Handed by Lord Monckton, folks like the IPCC, Algore, and the railroad engineer carbon scammer Pachauri misused statistics to claim an ever increasing warming over the past 150 years. In reality since 1850 there were three periods of warming with identical slopes, all were 20-30 years in length, all were separated by periods of cooling ranging between 15-25 years in length.
12 posted on
12/31/2009 5:01:36 AM PST by
aruanan
To: saganite
The article itself says only they reached a conclusion without any of their reasons. If they felt the article was important enough to print they could have found room for a few more paragraphs
13 posted on
12/31/2009 5:03:17 AM PST by
wiggen
(Never in the history of our great country have the people had less representation than they do today)
To: saganite
There is a link on the same page you link
.
.
.
.
2008 Likely To Be One Of The Top-Ten Warmest Years
ScienceDaily (Jan. 8, 2008) 2008 is set to be cooler globally than recent years say Met Office and University of East Anglia climate scientists, but is still forecast to be one of the top-ten warmest years.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080104091616.htm
16 posted on
12/31/2009 5:09:37 AM PST by
IrishMike
(Liberalism is a psychological disorder and a dangerous mental illness.)
To: saganite
Here’s what the “climate model simulations” say: If the temperature goes up, it’s man-made global warming. If the temperature goes down, it’s natural variability.
It’s so easy, even a fifth grader can do it.
18 posted on
12/31/2009 5:12:18 AM PST by
Rocky
(Obama's ego: The "I's" have it.)
To: saganite
I predicted this long ago! Within the next 2 years the Global warming crowd will say we have turned the corner, thanks to our hard work educating the world, we have brought planet earth back from the brink and actually reversed the warming trend. I guarantee this will happen, they will never say it was just a cycle.
These same “scientists” believe the world is billions of years old, yet we have only been keeping records for a couple hundred years. These same “scientists” also believe we evolved from apes, need I say more!
21 posted on
12/31/2009 5:41:54 AM PST by
Friendofgeorge
( SARAH PALIN or BUST.)
To: saganite
It's obvious to me. Any temperatures below normal are caused by natural variability, and any temperatures above normal are caused by anthropogenic global warming./s
22 posted on
12/31/2009 5:50:33 AM PST by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
To: saganite
In addition, the cool global temperatures during the past decade may appear to contrast with the warming expected due to human influence.OK, how many times have we been told that the last decade was the warmest recorded decade in the history of the planet?
24 posted on
12/31/2009 6:26:48 AM PST by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: saganite
Desperately trying to shovel against the tide of reality...
27 posted on
12/31/2009 7:51:56 AM PST by
jimt
To: saganite
Perlwitz et al. used observed temperature data and a suite of climate model simulations to analyze factors contributing to the 2008 North American temperature conditions.In accounting this method is referred to as "cooking the books." Ask Richard Scrushy or Bernie Madoff if that's a good idea or not.
28 posted on
12/31/2009 7:55:16 AM PST by
CholeraJoe
(My baloney has a first name, it's B-A-R-A-K. My baloney has a second name, it's O-B-A-M-A)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson