Posted on 02/02/2010 3:22:49 AM PST by SkyPilot
A trusted friend (in the USAF) described "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) as an envelope that surrounds military regulation. When Clinton put DADT into place, he was instituting a policy that forbade the application of the regulations against deviant homos and the ability of the military to enforce its rules.
My friend said that removing DADT effectively puts the pre-'93 regulations back at the forefront - and in full force. This means that the removal of DADT brings the military BACK to a position where they CAN ASK and CAN enforce the rules against queers in the military.
So, if this is all true...then does 0bama's removal of DADT actually give the military the ability to enforce its codes OR will the military have to also change its existing rules, codes, and regulations?
I'd appreciate some clarification. Thanks.
>Gates is looking at separate barracks and showers that will be “Gay Only.”
How insensitive to the transgendered, quadsexual, questioning, rosypalms and horned
gerbil seeking others! Are these soldiers left to sleep and shower in torture?
These people have lost their minds.
Who is going to want to defend this screwed up country?
People shouldn’t be surprised Bisexual Berry wants gays to flaunt their lifestyle in the military. He’s a pathetic excuse for a man. It makes me sick to think about Berry and his tutu wearing buddy playing hide the salami in the white house.
If you read the news, the gears are already changing. Gates has already ordered a "tolerance" during the "process." What the homosexuals really want is acceptance, applause for what they do, and to force the military members to comply with this deviancy. Moreover, the "hate crimes" regulations to accompany this travesty will be draconian and tyrannical.
Good grief.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.