Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Wins Presidential Straw Poll at CPAC
Fox News ^ | 2/20/2010 | FOX NEWS CHANNEL

Posted on 02/20/2010 2:42:51 PM PST by onyx

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-703 next last
To: EternalVigilance
LIAR!!!

I am 100% pro life. I believe abortion is taking the life of an innocent human being. I believe life begins at conception and it is the duty of our government to protect this life. I will always vote for any and all legislation that would end abortion or lead us in the direction of ending abortion. I believe in a Human Life Amendment and a Life at Conception Act as federal solutions to the abortion issue. I also believe that while we are working toward this goal, there are many other things we can accomplish in the near term. http://www.randpaul2010.com/issues/a-g/abortion-2/

Damn. You just don't give up do you?

681 posted on 02/22/2010 7:35:02 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Not if you burn the whole friggin’ Constitution to do it you jackass...


682 posted on 02/22/2010 7:35:30 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies]

Comment #683 Removed by Moderator

To: Dead Corpse
Your idiotic 14th Amendment argument that no court in the land accepts.

"Idiotic"? How can a clear reading of simple words be "idiotic"?

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Even Blackmun, the author of the majority Roe opinion, admitted that if the fetus is a person, they are "of course" protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Your heroes the Pauls are worse than Blackmun. They admit the fetus is a person, and then say the states can allow the killing of these innocent persons to continue. They consistently pretend that the Fourteenth Amendment, with its clear requirements placed upon the states to protect the unalienable rights of all, does not exist.

684 posted on 02/22/2010 7:40:16 AM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Not if you burn the whole friggin’ Constitution to do it you jackass...

I'm not burning it, you are. At least the parts you don't like - because of some misguided and confused notion you have about what government is even for.

685 posted on 02/22/2010 7:41:58 AM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Again, the Pauls consistently offer phony legislation that looks pro-life on the surface, but is exposed as the deception it is when you uncover the fact that it doesn’t address the imperative duty of every state to protect all innocent persons.

It’s pro-choice for states, and it ignores the parts of the Constitution that the Pauls don’t like.


686 posted on 02/22/2010 7:44:48 AM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Poor Turd Party moron. You still don't get it and you never will.

You will need to over turn Roe before anything else gets done.

Stop trying to paint the Paul's with the pro-abortion brush. Just because they want to take a more Constitutional approach does not make them the Enemy. Your endless attempts at character assassination are hurting your cause more than it is helping.

687 posted on 02/22/2010 7:45:11 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I'm not burning it, you are.

"I know you are but what am I".

Really? Is that the best you have? No wonder your beloved AIP can't field a candidate that garners even a percentage of what the LP does.

688 posted on 02/22/2010 7:46:04 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Well... Wrong. On everything in that post.

Try reading the bills purposed and who else is signing on to them.

689 posted on 02/22/2010 7:46:50 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
You're the one breathing out juvenile insults, not me.

a more Constitutional approach

One that ignores the Constitution, and the founders' clear statements about what the purpose of government and our Constitution even are.

690 posted on 02/22/2010 7:47:37 AM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I’ve read ‘em.


691 posted on 02/22/2010 7:48:37 AM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Even Blackmun, the author of the majority Roe opinion, admitted that if the fetus is a person, they are "of course" protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

That's why the death mongers call their intended victims "it," "brain dead," and a host of other dehumanizing terms. If they're forced to admit they're people, they have to admit they have the rights of personhood. And they can't do that.

692 posted on 02/22/2010 7:49:39 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
No State shall...deprive any person of life ...without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Which part of that is so hard to understand?

693 posted on 02/22/2010 7:51:00 AM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
That's right. Blackmun was forced to dehumanize the child.

But these pro-choice-for-staters are worse. They openly admit the personhood of the child, and then ignore the Fourteenth Amendment. The Pauls do it. McCain does it. Sarah Palin does it.

Their position destroys the basis in principle of the pro-life movement. It's poison.

694 posted on 02/22/2010 7:53:35 AM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
I think that source you cited cribbed six words, in two separate places, out of Rand Paul's entire answer; whereas I'd like to see the full interview. I don't believe for one second that 9/11 was an "inside job", but neither do I trust websites which crib multiple very short quotations and string them together to try to characterize an opponent (I wouldn't like it if I saw a pro-Rand website doing the same stunt to Trey Grayson, either).

Debra Medina is a different matter. I like her most of her stances on political issues overall, but it seems to me that she's gone well past just saying something like "We needs to investigate possible failures of intel, and even possible cover-ups of intel failures by self-serving officials" (which I don't think is "Trutherism" at all; it's a demand for government accountability as much as anything), and might be willing to entertain the notion of government complicity (or partial government complicity) in the actual attack.

That's not to insult Medina's supporters, who may have a different view of her comments; all that I can say is that in my own opinion, Medina's comments give off a bit of that "truther" vibe that I don't get from Rand Paul, and which make me uncomfortable with her.

And I think that's unfortunate, because Medina's positions on a number of other issues (economics, gun rights, etc.) are otherwise meritorious; but there you have it.

Maybe I'm just going with my gut on that, but that's my sense of things. Your mileage may vary.

695 posted on 02/22/2010 8:17:22 AM PST by Christian_Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Nothing. Now get Roe out of the way, and we can protect those lives a lot better.

Don't be an idiot...

696 posted on 02/22/2010 8:34:46 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the ping!


697 posted on 02/22/2010 10:02:31 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Conservative posers who like molesting farm animals in their spare time prefer Palin, but thanks for sharing your unique insights.


698 posted on 02/22/2010 10:07:10 AM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“All this does is prove beyond any doubt that CPAC is no longer conservative.”

The Republican party is no longer conservative.


699 posted on 02/22/2010 10:16:58 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Who are you kidding? You can’t even “get Roe out of the way” if you’ve abandoned the principles that made Roe unconstitutional and immoral in the first place.


700 posted on 02/22/2010 10:17:54 AM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-703 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson