Posted on 02/24/2010 11:17:49 AM PST by Christian_Capitalist
That’s after the boxer and tee shirt sand crawl at noon.
IBTZ...even Sarah said she was only in favor of Paul’s fiscal policy...which means in all other concerns (as we’ve pointed out for nearly 3 years now) that Paul and his progeny are basically nucking futs.
Lightning time! IBTZ
Dumb noobies end up ZOT food. You won’t last long.
I’ll have the electro-fried crunchy troll with the noob sauce on the side.
Pollster apologizes for omitting Bill Johnson from poll - admits that results are not accurate [KY]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 24, 2010
INTERVIEWS AND QUESTIONS: DAVID FLAHERTY 303-861-8585
MAGELLAN DATA AND MAPPING STRATEGIES APOLOGIZES FOR NOT INCLUDING BILL JOHNSON AND OTHER DECLARED US SENATE CANDIDATES IN KENTUCKY GOP PRIMARY SURVEY
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Louisville, CO – Magellan Strategies CEO David Flaherty today contacted US Senate candidate Bill Johnson and apologized to him personally for not including his name in Magellan’s February 18th survey of likely Republican primary voters. Magellan CEO David Flaherty stated “It was a gross oversight on our part and we sincerely apologize for any problems this may have caused to the Johnson, Grayson and other Republican US Senate campaigns in Kentucky.”
Flaherty continued, “The US Senate ballot test question from our February 18th survey is not accurate because Bill Johnson and other declared candidates were not included in the question. Without Bill Johnson and the other primary candidates included in the ballot test question the results are obviously not an accurate reflection of the Republican primary ballot that voters will choose from on May 18th.”
David Flaherty also contacted the Trey Grayson Campaign to apologize for the error.
FYI, the poll numbers that reflect reality, according to both the Johnson and Grayson campaigns, can be found HERE. They show Rand Paul in third, and the strength of his support to be very weak.
LOL! You really don't want to make any friends around here, do you?
That's odd. She said nothing restricting her endorsement to fiscal policy.
Palin said in a written statement that she’s “proud to support grassroots candidates like Dr. Paul.” She said is lending her support because Paul, the son of former presidential candidate Ron Paul of Texas, wants to “shake up the status quo in Washington.”
In fact, when challenged by uber-dork William Kristol on her endorsement of Rand Paul, Palin jumped quickly to defend Paul's command of Constitutional issues as one of her main reasons for endorsement.
So, Sarah Palin supports Rand Paul because he's a good Constitutionalist.
Sounds like a great team to me!
Personally, I doubt he's above 5% statewide, but he deserves to be included. He does have some measurable support.
She said I looked like an idiot, I told her to run along. Sticks and stones and all that; I doubt that I actually hurt her feelings or anything. Sheesh.
First the "truther supported" was entirely too slick for an honest person, but putting a quote on Rand Paul that isn't his is blatant lying, that was him as a representative on his father's 2008 campaign in 2007 when he was answering questions about what the Presidential candidate believed, that is why he was saying HE says, He wants, HE believes.
My wife and I had to go to dinner with the sound engineer and his wife from church, and then after dinner we had to record my next radio spot (on the Biblical argument against egregious taxation) for "Tea Time" Tea Party radio in Virginia.
I do have to take some off from the interwebs to go out and, y'know, actually advance conservative causes and stuff. My apologies for having to step away.
So you support Junior Paul ?
In late July. :)
“Asked by “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace why she endorsed Paul, Palin said “Because he’s a federalist and he wants the states to have more say and as we respect the 10th Amendment in our Constitution, he wants the states to have more say in a lot of these issues.”"
I don’t support lying, this forum won’t be very good if people are just making things up, doesn’t that bother you even a little?
You didn’t deny, you didn’t defend, you simply tried a different tack, please address the lying first.
That flaming anti-war spam monkey would likely lose control of his bladder and begin weeping like a little girl at the sound of a heavy door slamming. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.