Posted on 03/11/2010 11:23:00 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan
We really, really wanted to take a break from writing about Orly Taitz today. It appears she's trying to get our attention, though. And maybe the police's as well.
The screen-shot posted above is one left on a recent blog post of hers. The judge mentioned is Royce C. Lamberth, who is assigned to her Taitz v. Obama lawsuit in Washington D.C. Taitz didn't write the comment, but her blog is moderated: No comments can be made public unless Taitz okay's them.
It's not like Taitz allows every comment to be made public. There are plenty of Taitz-critical comments left that never see the light of day. So Taitz or someone who works for her made the decision to publish a reader's comment about threatening a judge's grandchildren with murder. This should play well in Taitz's run for office.
Elsewhere on OrlyTaitzEsq.com--which we recommend you don't visit unless you've got some heavy-duty malware blocking software--we have the Laguna Niguel dentist lashing out against local media. Specifically, the local media that you are reading right now:
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.ocweekly.com ...
If that was the purpose it's an EPIC FAIL! Don't you have anything more important to do like clip your toe nails and eat pork cracklins?
Thanks for the links. You’re a better searcher than I.
This all makes much more sense. Spencer Kornhaber of OC Weekly posted an article using the comment of someone posting to Taitz’s web site, to perform a drive by smear of Taitz, and by association anyone who questions whether Obama is constitutionally eligible to be president.
Thank you for clearing that up. So we’re just speculating here about her assumed guilt.
You’re presuming facts not in evidence.
Typical obamabot, screams the post is still there, then admits he never went to the website. Who do youy get your talking points from? Axelturf?
“And I’m amazed to see freepers try to defend Orly on this one.”
You over-reached. It was a brilliant trap, but you went a mite too far.
If she were president, I would hold her to the same standard I held President Bush. Do you know how high that was?
You posted to me that she should be imprisoned. For this? A rogue post?
Nobody is worried about Strunk. He files so many interpleaders that one can hardly keep up with them. You should check them out.
OK Uncle Chip. I will join the two threads in the future, and your take. Thank you for the heads’ up!
Or it might be an act intended to help discredit skeptics with the same broad brush that Democrats love to paint with.
When Orly says she allowed the post then we will know. From what I do know of her she is outspoken and will tell us. I saw the post, I do not believe Orly supports violence at all.
Unfortunately, some Freepers have gone all in with Orly. They have to either admit that she is a fraud, that they were wrong to blindly support her, and that her critics here were correct, or they have to keep supporting her, and justifying, rationalizing or minimizing each new crazy stunt that she pulls.
I’ll be glad to assume innocence. Thank you again.
It wasn’t a trap. That’s an excuse for people to get out of defending Orly on this one.
Yes, I said she should be disbarred, fined, and imprisoned. I should have added “if convicted” because one should never assume guilt. So, my bad on that one. She deserves a fair trial.
However, I didn’t say she should be prosecuted for allowing one rogue comment. (And it wasn’t rogue, she approved it for publication.) She should be prosecuted for her conduct as a whole from the beginning of her travelling freak show to now. But if I had to pick just one of her actions, I’d say subornation of perjury would be it.
I’m not bought into anything. If you would like to discuss her stunts, etc., I’ll give it thought. Blank slate here really, just that I think the “president” is hiding a lot about himself.
“But if I had to pick just one of her actions, I’d say subornation of perjury would be it.”
OK, now you’re talking.
Are you amazed to see a FReeper who has never said a word about her until today tear your vanity post apart without defending her? You're a troll. This entire thread of yours is classic troll posting.
I'm not a Birther and never have been, so she's hardly any royalty to me. But all you have to do is scroll up this thread and see the hard core Birthers jumping to her defense. Your buddies love her even if you profess not to.
What happened to ole honest Abe? I thought he was your favorite queen.
Never miss a chance to interject homosexuality into a discussion, do you? One really has to wonder about your fascination with that.
There was no call for any sort of violence against anyone in that posting. Read it more carefully: PICTURES of the kids, and PICTURES of (unrelated) victims of violence, sent to an adult.
While it’s stupid, crude, rude and vulgar, it is most definitely NOT a call for an assault on anyone.
When I first saw this thread, I thought, gee, maybe Tex is trying to help a ‘birther’. Silly me. I was disappointed, FRiend.
The comment at her web site was inappropriate but I don’t think it was intended as a threat due to the inclusion of the part about “MS-13”.
<><><><><
So what do you think the context and the intent of the post is, if not a threat to the judge’s family? Otherwise, it’s pretty much a non-sequitor.
You continue to say what it is not, how about expressing it in the positive by telling what it means.
Now for some Democrat “threat humor”, coming up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.