Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Ron Paul calls Abe Lincoln a blood-thirsty war-mongerer.

LOL

Now using the Paulistinian logic when they attack and smear Palin, I think we now have indisputible evidence that Ron Paul supports slavery!

1 posted on 03/31/2010 3:04:35 PM PDT by TitansAFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last
To: TitansAFC

Ron Paul is a kook.


2 posted on 03/31/2010 3:06:23 PM PDT by Mogollon (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

May all the slaveholders weren’t willing to sell.


3 posted on 03/31/2010 3:06:30 PM PDT by Persevero (Ask yourself: "What does the Left want me to do?" Then go do the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

What’s next?

I’ll bet he’s got the same opinion about the Revolutionary War of 1776.

The man is a total loon and a coward!


4 posted on 03/31/2010 3:06:48 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

This is they guy who never tired of saying that 911 was our fault.

On that, he’s in complete agreement with 96% of the English professors in the United States.


5 posted on 03/31/2010 3:07:01 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

Buying the slaves was offered as part of many, many plans to end slavery (or let it taper off and die by the year 1900).

As late as 1864, the Union offered to buy all the slaves if the South would end the war. Otherwise, the South would lose its slaves anyway, not be compensated for them, and most of its territory would be ruined by war as well.

But the South wouldn’t take the offer. Emotions had gone beyond reason (and had, even in 1860).


6 posted on 03/31/2010 3:07:22 PM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

I doubt they were all for sale.


7 posted on 03/31/2010 3:07:31 PM PDT by Rennes Templar (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC; rabscuttle385

Hey Rabs,

Have you got an opinion about Ron Paul’s opinion about the Civil War?


8 posted on 03/31/2010 3:07:41 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

Paul is a nut.


9 posted on 03/31/2010 3:08:32 PM PDT by svcw (Religion is like giving someone who is dying of thirst mouthwash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC; Captain Kirk

Hey CK,

Any opinions on Ron Paul’s idea that we didn’t need to fight the Civil War?


10 posted on 03/31/2010 3:08:37 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

Makes one wonder yet again about Rand Paul. “But Montag, the sins of the father...” Yeah I know, but it reminds me alot about Scott McClellan’s insane leftist father, and look how Scott turned out: MSNBC’s favorite “Republican”.


11 posted on 03/31/2010 3:08:48 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

Why doesn’t Ron Paul just go away. Half the time he has a semblance of common sense - the other half he sounds like Professor Irwin Corey on an acid trip.


12 posted on 03/31/2010 3:08:48 PM PDT by Apercu ("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

And would that purchase have included the southerner’s written “promise” not to get replacements?

And after that, what’s a promise (written or otherwise) worth?

After all, look at what the commies are doing to our constitution right now?

And perhaps we’re gonna have another war over it.

Interesting.


14 posted on 03/31/2010 3:09:38 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

The South fought a war to keep slaves and would have turned the money down. With a little research, I’ll bet a Freeper can find where there was an actual offer.

Britain paid to free children kept in slavery.


16 posted on 03/31/2010 3:10:09 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

Yeah. and we should’ve just bought off the Indian tribes, Great Britain, France, Germany, Japan, the USSR, Communist China, North Korea, North Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, etc, etc, etc.

Sometimes you just have to fight for freedom.


17 posted on 03/31/2010 3:10:10 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

That knits the pearl. Paul is a certifiable nutzoid!


19 posted on 03/31/2010 3:10:14 PM PDT by chooseascreennamepat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

Now, we think to put in bills the reimbursement costs from some mandates. At that time, they didn’t. And the mandate that the slaves must be freed didn’t go down well.

The idea that a whole war, with many hundreds of thousands of lives to be lost, was probably not fathomed as being as great as it turned out to be.

I normally think of Ron as a kook, but there is a thread of sanity in this thinking.


20 posted on 03/31/2010 3:10:21 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

Because the Civil War wasn’t really about slavery.....


24 posted on 03/31/2010 3:11:33 PM PDT by Osage Orange (A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. - Sigmund Freud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

Every time I think about starting to like Ron Paul he opens his yap and says something really dumb...


26 posted on 03/31/2010 3:11:50 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC
The slave owners would have loved that - since it wouldn't have ended slavery - and been a real “cash crop” - we'd still be “buying” slaves.

Heck, it would probably have started a whole new scheme - Hey, you become my slave, I'll sell you and we can split the money.”

27 posted on 03/31/2010 3:12:01 PM PDT by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TitansAFC

29 posted on 03/31/2010 3:12:34 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Entitlements will do to America what drugs eventually do to addicts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson