You Have the Right to Remain Silent (LT Colonel Lakin Read His Rights)

Safe Guard Our Constitution ^

[Man50D]

Washington, D.C., April 13, 2010. Army doctor Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin yesterday met with his brigade commander, Col. Gordon R. Roberts, who proceeded to read LTC Lakin his Miranda rights, and who informed LTC Lakin he had the “right to remain silent” because LTC Lakin is about to be charged with serious crimes. Col. Roberts was at age 19 awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the only recipient of the nation’s highest honor currently on active duty in the Army.

LTC Lakin had previously been ordered in writing to report yesterday to Ft. Campbell, KY and then on to deploy for his second tour of duty in Afghanistan. Lakin refused to obey these orders and instead came to work yesterday morning at the Pentagon. Late yesterday afternoon he was confronted by his brigade commander.

Before the meeting was over, LTC Lakin’s Pentagon Access Pass had been revoked, and his laptop computer was set to be confiscated.

The message to LTC Lakin is clear; through official channels, he was informed yesterday that he will shortly be court-martialled for crimes (specifically, missing movement and conduct unbecoming an officer) that for others has led to lengthy imprisonment at hard labor.

Lakin has announced in a YouTube video that has now been viewed more than 110,000 times that he considers it his duty to refuse to obey orders that would be illegal if President Obama is ineligible to hold office.

Meanwhile, cries mount for proof of that eligibility, but nothing has been forthcoming. The Obama campaign at one point released a copy of computer-generated abstract of information purportedly in Hawaii's records system, but the source of this information is unclear and need not have been a birth certificate issued contemporaneously and signed by the doctor who attended the birth. Even the document released was only a copy, and the version printed in the Los Angeles Times on June 16, 2008 is on a form only in use since late 2001. Even as it is, the document contains a warning that it is merely “prima facie”--threshold, rebuttable and thus inconclusive --evidence of birth, and the copy the Times printed mysteriously has the certificate number blacked out, thereby rendering the document unusable according to language on the bottom.

Given the seriousness of the offenses with which LTC Lakin is about to be charged, the American Patriot Foundation today renewed its plea for donations to its legal defense fund for LTC Lakin. Details are available at APF's website, www.safeguardourconstitution.com

[Cyropaedia]

Whoa.

[lucysmom]

I looked at your post and links. I must say the evidence is so weak some might call it nonexistent.

[etraveler13]

For some, no amount of evidence is sufficient.

[lucysmom]

For some, no amount of evidence is sufficient.

That Obama was called Barry rather than Barack as a child and young man is no evidence of an adoption or legal name change. If you want to be taken seriously, you need to come up with better stuff than that.

[etraveler13]

I disagree, I have provided information that you might not consider sufficient, but it was aquired by lawyers on current litigation, and to their mind, is sufficient to place before the court. I shared it with you, and you find it insufficient. I will not, and do not expect to satisfy everyone, but so far, your the only one who feels it is insufficient.
We all know that until this recieves a fair hearing in court, and discovery is allowed, anything that has been sealed by Obama will be speculation. Gathering of facts will always be a bone of contention based on the belief system of the reader, or their particular brand of politics. I accept that. The fact that its not good enough for you, is regrettable, but does not deter my belief stream, as you had not disproven anything offered, simply not accepted it. Thats fine with me.
I will not lose any sleep if you do not take me seriously, because, in the end, the facts, not me, will be weighed and measured, and that is all that is important ie. for the truth to come out, which ever side it falls on.
Obama is not qualified to be President because his father is not a US Citizen, and never was. He was or was not adopted is ancilary to the fact that his father was not a US citizen. At the VERY BEST, he is a naturalized citizen. Personally, I think he is an illegal alien, just like his aunt who is living in DC and has been the past 12 years, and on the public dole to boot.

[lucysmom]

I disagree, I have provided information that you might not consider sufficient, but it was aquired by lawyers on current litigation, and to their mind, is sufficient to place before the court. I shared it with you, and you find it insufficient. I will not, and do not expect to satisfy everyone, but so far, your the only one who feels it is insufficient.

Would these be the lawyers that repeatedly have their cases dismissed because they don't meet the most basic criteria, that is, standing?

No, I'm not the only one who thinks the use of a nickname is proof of adoption or legal name change. (Do you think "Scooter" is Libby's legal name?)

Obama is not qualified to be President because his father is not a US Citizen, and never was. He was or was not adopted is ancilary to the fact that his father was not a US citizen. At the VERY BEST, he is a naturalized citizen. Personally, I think he is an illegal alien, just like his aunt who is living in DC and has been the past 12 years, and on the public dole to boot.

The trouble is that Obama has never claimed that his father was anything more than an absent sperm donor and a citizen of GB and then Kenya. If that were sufficient to keep him out of the Oval Office, you wouldn't need these ancillary issues to pump up your premise that he doesn't qualify.

[etraveler13]

For your first statement, it is obvious to anyone that reads the judges dismissal statements that the cases are not being dismissed because of the merits, but technicalities.
For your second statement, your just being obtuse.
His father is not a US citizen, therefore Obama is not a Natural born citizen, therefore he does not meet the qualifications for the office. Period.
That IS sufficient for him not to be POTUS.

Just because a car thief steals a car, Possession does not equal Ownership. The fact that the thief has eluded the police, or they do not pursue him, does not make him less guilty, or NOT a thief....you ken?

[curiosity]

I read your long post proporting to show Obama lost his US citizenship.

It is very nice, except that it ignores one curcial thing: US citizenship is governed by US law, not Indonesian law and not the Hague convetion.

Unfortunately for the birther case, there is no provision under US immigration law at the time (the 1952 immigration and nationality act) under which Obama would have lost his citizenship as a minor living in Indonesia, even if he were adopted by Lolo.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

Oh, and one other thing: WorldNutDaily isn't a reliable source, and neither is African Press International. The proported interview with Michelle Obama, wherein she supposedly admitted her husband was adopted, never took place.

[curiosity]

At the VERY BEST, he is a naturalized citizen.

The you should be able to find a public record of his naturalization.

[curiosity]

For your first statement, it is obvious to anyone that reads the judges dismissal statements that the cases are not being dismissed because of the merits

Standing is not a technicality. A case in which the plaintiff has no standing by definition has no merit.

[curiosity]

Even it was resized, it doesn't explain why the edge of the paper is cut off, but not cut off at the edge of the jpg.

LOL. Have you ever heard of cropping? I can see you haven't scanned many documents in your day.

[etraveler13]

Oh, and one other thing: WorldNutDaily isn’t a reliable source, and neither is African Press International. The proported interview with Michelle Obama, wherein she supposedly admitted her husband was adopted, never took place.

---

Newsflash Curiosity....

---

African Press International (API) claims to have audio recordings of Michelle Obama in a bigoted rant against “American bloggers” and anti-Obama media outlets (Fox?).

The release has taken long due to the fact that API wanted to clear all legal hurdles and be safe from getting sued by any one. API and a US Law firm - LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG has just entered into an agreement giving the law firm the right to represent API in all matters that may arise due to the Michelle Obama interview and the release of the tapes in the US.

API has realised that the interview with Mrs Obama is of great significance in the coming elections. The release of the tapes is not intended to derail the elections or to destroy the chances that Mr Obama may have in getting elected the first black president of the United States.

[etraveler13]

There is reading, then there is READING...

---

There are claims that a parent cannot expatriate a child’s U.S. citizenship, however, this is not correct.

---

See The Nationality Act of 1940, revised 1952, Section 318(a) “A former citizen of the United States expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parent or parents and who has not acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parent or parents may be naturalized upon filing a petition for naturalization before reaching age of twenty-five years and upon compliance with all requirements of the naturalization laws with the following exceptions: (b) No former citizen of the United States, expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parent or parents shall be obliged to comply with the requirements of the immigration laws, if he has not not acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parent or parents, and if he has come or shall come to the United States before reaching the age of twenty-five years. (c) After his naturalization such person shall have the same citizenship status as if he had not been expatriated.”

---

Renewing an Indonesian Passport after the age of 18 is an affirmative act, as you are swearing allegiance to another Country. Soetoro/Obama renewed his Indonesian Passport when he traveled to Pakistan, that is why he had to stop in Indonesia first.

---

Remember, in 1981, Dunham was divorcing Soetoro in Hawaii and was not in Indonesia. Obama/Soetoro admits to traveling to Indonesia first and then onto Pakistan. Soetoro/Obama claims in his book “Dreams from my father” that he stopped in Indonesia to visit his mother. But again, his mother was not in Indonesia, she was in Hawaii with Maya, divorcing Lolo Soetoro.
In addition, the State Department has stated in response to a FOIA request that they do not have a U.S. Passport application on file for Barack H. Obama.

[curiosity]

African Press International (API) claims to have audio recordings of Michelle Obama in a bigoted rant against “American bloggers” and anti-Obama media outlets (Fox?).

Yeah, API claims a lot of things. Unfortunately, that doesn't make them true.

I'll believe the recordings exist when I hear them.

The release has taken long due to the fact that API wanted to clear all legal hurdles and be safe from getting sued by any one.

Sure. Just like the transfer of the title to the bridge you bought last week from Joey in Brooklyn is taking longer than expected. ROFLOL.

API and a US Law firm - LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG has just entered into an agreement giving the law firm the right to represent API in all matters that may arise due to the Michelle Obama interview and the release of the tapes in the US.

LOL. Now you are using Phil Berg, the guy who believes 9-11 was an inside job, to corrobrate the story. Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?

API has realised that the interview with Mrs Obama is of great significance in the coming elections. The release of the tapes is not intended to derail the elections or to destroy the chances that Mr Obama may have in getting elected the first black president of the United States.

Put up or shut up. If the tapes exist, then produce them. If you don't produce them, then the only thing any reasonable person can conclude is that they don't exist.

[etraveler13]

I don’t believe he is a naturalized citizen. Personally I belive he is an illegal alien.
I do not believe that there is a document to be found.
That is why he is sealing everything.
I stated that AT THE VERY BEST... which presumes
that he came back to the US and reapplied for citizenship
denounced his Indonesian citizenship
denounced his British citizenship
None of which I think he did.
I think he got his education with student visas from Indonesia and travelled under an Indonesian passport
Illegally changed his name from Barry Soetoro to Barak Obama
I don’t care if you believe me, it is my own investigation and satisfies only me. Don’t like it? Tough.

[etraveler13]

Standing is an arbitrary tactic used by judges. It is a techincality to avoid discovery, or hearing a case.
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/standing/

[etraveler13]

You seem to have the misinformed belief that I give a flip what you believe. It is in the court system now. Berg is pursueing it at his speed not yours, and I pretty much guarantee that he does not give a cr!p about what you might or might not think.
Circumstantially, it makes sense to believe that Berg has heard the recording, and as such has proceeded with it. The fact that you have not heard it, means nothing.
Finally, I am not asking you to believe or judge anything. I am just passing along informtion.
Feel free to find definitive proof that this was never said, like a statement by Michelle Obama, reported by API.

[edge919]

LOL. Have you ever heard of cropping? I can see you haven't scanned many documents in your day.

Ummm, no. The document in the scan doesn't go all the way to the edge of the jpg, which is what would happen if it was cropped. Cropping doesn't add white space around a document. What you see in Obama's scan is the full document PLUS white space surrounding the edge of the document. The white part is the bottom of the scan lid. Somehow, the paper grew between the scan and the document that was photographed by factlack dot org. One or both documents is fraudulent.

[curiosity]

The document in the scan doesn't go all the way to the edge of the jpg, which is what would happen if it was cropped.

Uhh..yes it can. Scanners can be set to add a white border. On some scanners that is the default setting.

What you see in Obama's scan is the full document

You have absolutely no way of knowing that.

[curiosity]

Standing is an arbitrary tactic used by judges.

LOL. No it's not. Standing is simply the requirement that a plaintiff be able to show direct, tangible harm arising from the actions of the defendant.

It is an essential part of our legal system. Without it, there would be no limit on whom one could sue and for what.