Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood wonders if Arnold Schwarzenegger will be back
Los Angeles Times ^ | April 18, 2010 | Steven Zeitchik

Posted on 04/17/2010 11:17:13 AM PDT by EveningStar

His time as California governor is winding down. He still has acting to fall back on.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnoldschwarzenegger; hollywood; schwarzenegger

1 posted on 04/17/2010 11:17:14 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I hated his performance as governor. Time for a new role.


2 posted on 04/17/2010 11:17:56 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

He was a box office flop as the Governator.


3 posted on 04/17/2010 11:18:45 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Did the RINO pay his back taxes yet?

Oh, I forgot!

By magic, it was straightened out and no longer an issue. I suppose since he is running Calif. into the ground as well as any Demoncrapper would, he shouldn’t have to [ay his taxes either.


4 posted on 04/17/2010 11:19:30 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

He’s getting old looking and was known before for his action films, so unless it involves a wheelchair race, I don’t see it happening for him.

He may produce things though behind the scenes.


5 posted on 04/17/2010 11:22:13 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

>>His time as California governor is winding down. He still has acting to fall back on<<

Well, movies anyway...


6 posted on 04/17/2010 11:22:27 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Craven spirits wear their master's collars but real men would rather feed the battlefield's vultures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

As long as they keep him this time.


7 posted on 04/17/2010 11:22:55 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

8 posted on 04/17/2010 11:27:36 AM PDT by Daffynition ( In the span of one man's lifetime, only the individual has any potential - not the collective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Why I am going to go watch a movie he’s in? Really, why?


9 posted on 04/17/2010 11:31:12 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

With a lot of airbrushing and soft lenses.


10 posted on 04/17/2010 11:32:47 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I suspect that a lot of people who enjoyed his movies probably won’t want to watch him any more.

Although, who knows? A ton of conservatives went to see “Avatar.” Personally, I wouldn’t touch it with a 10-foot pole, but evidently not everyone felt the same way.


11 posted on 04/17/2010 11:46:59 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

He’s in a movie called “The Expendables” with Stallone, Bruce Willis and Arnie ....http://theexpendablesmovie.net/


12 posted on 04/17/2010 11:47:41 AM PDT by SkyDancer (Those That Turn Their Swords into Plows Will Plow For Those That Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Whoops, might have confused Steve Austin with Bruce Willis ... I saw the trailer ....


13 posted on 04/17/2010 11:48:54 AM PDT by SkyDancer (Those That Turn Their Swords into Plows Will Plow For Those That Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

ping


14 posted on 04/17/2010 11:55:41 AM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Well when he leaves, a lot of Californians will be saying “Hasta la vista, baby”...


15 posted on 04/17/2010 11:56:29 AM PDT by mikrofon (Term-Limitated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

His role as Governor destroyed his acting credibility. Now we all know he’s a girly-man.


16 posted on 04/17/2010 12:06:45 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (I don’t trust the reasoning of anyone who writes then when they mean than.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

They’re both in it. I think Willis and Ah-nold both make a cameo. Heck, from the preview, it looks like every ‘action guy’ from the past two decades makes a cameo!


17 posted on 04/17/2010 12:09:05 PM PDT by Mr. Thorne ("But iron, cold iron, shall be master of them all..." Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I'm not really impressed with Ahnuld's acting.

I'd tell him "don't quit your day job," but he isn't good at his day job either.

18 posted on 04/17/2010 12:13:36 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne

My girlfriend and I are going to go see it ... we’re action freaks ....


19 posted on 04/17/2010 12:18:56 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Those That Turn Their Swords into Plows Will Plow For Those That Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I did not see it but not because I am conservative but because it does not seem interesting to me. Hollywood has never dictated what I see or not see and that goes for politics as well. I just can't see how people allow others to dictate whether to see a movie or not. I make those decisions myself.
20 posted on 04/17/2010 1:01:17 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

The two reasons are not unrelated. Liberal movie directors are more and more concerned with spreading the latest propaganda, and that’s not why I read a book or see a movie.

I did make the mistake of going to see “Dancing With Wolves.” Interesting in some ways, but the propaganda was so dominant it completely overwhelmed everything else.


21 posted on 04/17/2010 2:25:17 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Interesting...I did not see Dancing with the Wolves either...lol. I did see Titanic, the hurt locker, American Beauty, Forrest Gump, and a few other Academy Awards. I only watch the interesting ones....American Beauty was intense and a bit disgusting. Why did I see that? I can't even explain it myself :).
22 posted on 04/17/2010 2:28:45 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson