Skip to comments.
New government entity to take control over military and civilian networks
Tech 1984 ^
| 5/31/10
| Tech 1984
Posted on 06/07/2010 9:29:58 PM PDT by oc-flyfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-271 last
To: oc-flyfish
Which article are you referring to? Yours, or Quix’ in 135?
To: Thidwick
262
posted on
06/10/2010 3:59:50 AM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: null and void
New government entity to take control over military and civilian networks Like they have with the GoM cleanup and well plugging?
Riiiiight ....
I'm surprised this current group doesn't require help going to the bathroom.
263
posted on
06/10/2010 11:02:38 AM PDT
by
_Jim
(Conspiracy theories are the favored tools of the weak-minded.)
To: AnAmericanMother
LLS, they didn't confiscate, they just asked folks to quit transmitting, and folks by and large abided by the request. My F-I-L was a ham at the time. Of course, they drafted him and put him in the Signal Corps . . . !
The FCC at the time assured that this was carried out (no operation), too.
264
posted on
06/10/2010 11:04:29 AM PDT
by
_Jim
(Conspiracy theories are the favored tools of the weak-minded.)
To: _Jim
Oh, yeah, you'd get a friendly visit from the boys with the little portable antennas if you got on the air.
I can certainly understand that! The Germans were busy putting clandestine shortwave operators in place (although the best known one turned out to be a double agent!)
265
posted on
06/10/2010 12:35:37 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
To: Eastbound
Mine. Sorry for the confusion.
To: oc-flyfish
Okay, thanks. Yup. Agree that.
To: Jet Jaguar
Is it really possible for the entire internet to be taken over by some people in one room? It’s called the WORLD WIDE WEB. That’s a lot of “tubes” for a small amount of people to plug up.
To: Terry Mross
The problem is that it comes into just a few points of entry and then is distributed out from there. Those entry points are the choke holds that would be seized. So, yes.
To: oc-flyfish
"The problem is that it comes into just a few points of entry and then is distributed out from there. Those entry points are the choke holds that would be seized. So, yes." From what I understand, (according to David Miller, L.A.W.) one small cube is what everything on the World Wide Web filters through. True or not, I don't know. But probably so.
To: antiRepublicrat
Bruce Schneier has a text book, Applied Cryptography. It was, and is, the best. It had code in it to show how to implement the various cryptographic algorithms. The book also came with a disk with the code on it. I actually have that book, and yes, it is very good.
271
posted on
06/11/2010 10:24:26 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-271 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson