Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roger Ebert: Saul Alinsky comes to the Tea Party
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | June 12, 2010 | Roger Ebert

Posted on 06/12/2010 5:57:36 PM PDT by maggief

I had heard a great deal about Saul Alinsky's book Rules for Radicals, but had never read them. The Right has demonized Alinsky, linking him to Obama. Curious to know more, I went to Wikipedia and found the Rules themselves.

As I read them, it occurred to me that these Rules are strategic, not ideological. Alinsky was of the Left, but the Rules have no party.

As I look around America in 2010, it occurs to me that the group currently using these Rules most effectively is the Tea Party.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.suntimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: ebert; rogerebert; saulalinsky; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: maggief

I do support using SOME of Alinsky’s tactics sparingly. Things like cutting a target out of the herd and politically eliminating it are fair play on the field we’ve been given.


21 posted on 06/12/2010 6:26:54 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

“The Right has demonized Alinsky, linking him to Obama.”


“The man dedicated his book to Satan you idiot.”

If only you could have responded to him in real time. The look on his face would have been priceless—because he doesn’t have a clue.


22 posted on 06/12/2010 6:27:09 PM PDT by CommieCutter (Obamanomics :Privatize Gains, Socialize Losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fkabuckeyesrule

“Please Roger provide an example of Tea party people invented frivilious lawsuits and “ethical” complaints designed to do nothing but smear and personally defund an elected governor. Waiting lefties...waiting lefties.”

Rog googled Wiki ... and the Sun-Times posted his analysis.

Both are ‘Chicago Way’ tools.


23 posted on 06/12/2010 6:27:19 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“I do support using SOME of Alinsky’s tactics sparingly. Things like cutting a target out of the herd and politically eliminating it are fair play on the field we’ve been given.”


I agree 100%.


24 posted on 06/12/2010 6:27:54 PM PDT by CommieCutter (Obamanomics :Privatize Gains, Socialize Losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

I had heard a great deal about Saul Alinsky's book Rules for Radicals, but had never read them

Hey Roger:

Don't you mean "never read it"? Shouldn't the book title be underlined?

25 posted on 06/12/2010 6:32:50 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Who allowed the worst oil pollution disaster in American history and did nothing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter

We don’t have to be criminal or file frivolous lawsuits but there are Alinsky tactics we can use sparingly.

Let our conscience be our guide.


26 posted on 06/12/2010 6:34:32 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Gee they sure do catch on quick don’t they? *eyeroll*


27 posted on 06/12/2010 6:42:01 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
He is proof that liberals are mentally ill.
28 posted on 06/12/2010 6:42:30 PM PDT by proudofthesouth (Thanks Zero! I actually miss the Clintoons being in the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Roger Ebert must really think someone gives a damn about what he writes.


29 posted on 06/12/2010 6:48:30 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I’ll bet seeing the right using Alinsky’s tactics made Ebert’s jaw drop.


30 posted on 06/12/2010 6:55:25 PM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingLudd

He dated Oprah? She is much more attractive than the large black woman he married. Guess he has a thing for the type.

He gives any liberal movie 4 stars and that goes for any movie directed or produced by one of his favorites.

Otherwise,he still does a decent job of movie reviews but he is a total idiot.

Gotta admire him though for hanging in through what he’s gone through.


31 posted on 06/12/2010 6:56:00 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maggief
As I read them, it occurred to me that these Rules are strategic, not ideological. Alinsky was of the Left, but the Rules have no party.

The Taxed Enough Already Party would never feed beans to a horde of homeless, and then give them seats at a hoity, toity event.

32 posted on 06/12/2010 7:00:41 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

ping


33 posted on 06/12/2010 7:03:22 PM PDT by Temple Owl (Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Don't you mean "never read it"?

Normally you'd be right, but Roger didn't bother to read the book. He read some of Alinsky's text off Wikipedia and imagines he understands the whole thing. And he also thinks there's such a thing as "the" Tea Party, as in a political party by that name. There wasn't a single correct premise in that mess of a posting.

34 posted on 06/12/2010 7:09:42 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Face rot has extended to brain rot....or is it the other way around????


35 posted on 06/12/2010 7:12:51 PM PDT by Shimmer1 (Protons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

It is written to Chicago so I guess we should expect it. But he evidently reads books about like he reviews movies.


36 posted on 06/12/2010 7:14:28 PM PDT by needtowakeup (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Alinsky was an evil man. An evil genius. His book “Rules For Radicals” was one of the best political manuals for trouble makers ever written. It was brilliant. And if you read it, you can devise strategies to counterattack the very real and effective actions of the Progressive Leftists who would destroy our nation and our liberties — and even, in some cases, turn THEIR strategies against them.

Ebert is wrong to the extent that the Tea Parties are not driven by “rebellion,” but by restoring liberties. The motivations are totally different — totally opposite. Leftists are motivated by SELFISH goals in the guise of “shared rewards,” Tea Partiers are motivated by selfless goals that will benefit future generations — not only of theeir own children but all children — providing the OPPORTUNITIES and possibilities for achievement which which leftists will always discourage or deny.


37 posted on 06/12/2010 7:15:00 PM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

He must have brain mets. His doctors at Northwestern need to order an MRI of his brain.


38 posted on 06/12/2010 7:45:08 PM PDT by Gapplega
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Why are these newspapers still in business? Or their buildings still standing? Why are their insulting dimwitted scribes still typing?

America seems to have no one with any balls.


39 posted on 06/12/2010 11:19:52 PM PDT by j-damn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
The idiocy of this statement is astounding.

Yup, particularly this part..."The Right has demonized Alinsky, linking him to Obama." There is a photo of Obama teaching some of them on a chalk board I believe...but of course it's just the right that is linking Obama to them.

40 posted on 06/13/2010 4:28:08 AM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to leave in the hands of the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson