Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video Shows Federal Officials Knew Quickly of Potential for Massive Oil Flow in Gulf Spill
AL.com / Birmingham Press-Register ^ | 5/1/2010 - Yes, MAY 1st | Ben Raines

Posted on 06/14/2010 6:46:10 PM PDT by unspun

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: hoosiermama

high crimes and misdemeanors and dereliction of duty!


61 posted on 06/15/2010 6:04:04 AM PDT by penelopesire ("Did you plug the hole yet daddy?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: unspun

62 posted on 06/15/2010 6:11:43 AM PDT by McGruff (So how is that Hopey Changey thingy working out for ya America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Trivia: American consumers and small businesses spill more than 9 million gallons of gasoline each year. That's the equivalent of an oil supertanker
63 posted on 06/15/2010 6:24:02 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Thanks — bookmarked.


64 posted on 06/15/2010 6:27:40 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: unspun

bump


65 posted on 06/15/2010 6:31:31 AM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping List-freepmail me to be included or removed. <{{{><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Yes, thank you. See also, from Unified Command spokesperson:

http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2010/06/video-shows-us-government-well-aware-in.html


66 posted on 06/15/2010 6:41:58 AM PDT by unspun (It's individual, state & national sovereignties, 'stupid' - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


67 posted on 06/15/2010 6:48:27 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Folks, what has slowed up the process for RECOVERY, is that this disaster was not PLANNED for. When you plan for such things, you identify obstacles. In this case, the obstacles had to be overcome one by one, instead of being seamless because of pre-planning.

Local responders knew what they needed to do, but just after the spill, BP initiated ITS own emergency plane, which I am certain it HAS. This is SOP!!!!! It is what SHOULD happen. What happened NEXT was a Cluster F*** of people, all with Jurisdiction seeing who could pee farther. This is what PRE-PLANNING for emergency management is FOR. It ELIMINATES the pissing contest over jurisdiction, and makes the process a managed one.

Here is where the Obama administration fell down yet again.

THEY PROVIDED NO EMERGENCY MANAGER WITH COMMAND AUTHORITY.

That is ESSENTIAL in situations like this, and they did NOTHING. So the pissing contest continued, and got worse as more and more feds, locals and military (Coast Guard) got involved, and progress of ANY sort ground to a halt.

THAT is what broke down here. Mark my words.


68 posted on 06/15/2010 7:13:01 AM PDT by Danae (If Liberals were only moderately insane, they would be tollerable. Alas, such is not the case.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (S.395)

In 1995, both houses of Congress passed and President Bill Clinton signed the Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (S.395), which granted a royalty "holiday" to oil and gas companies drilling in government-owned deep waters in the Gulf of Mexico for leases sold between 1996 and 2000.

Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 (S. 3711/H.R. 6111)

In 2006, Congress passed and the President signed the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act. Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) and Senate Energy Committee Chairman Pete Domenici (R-N.M.), coauthored the plan to open 8.3 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico and share 37.5 percent of the new royalty revenues, dedicated to coastal protection, with Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi and Alabama. An additional 12.5 percent will be dedicated to the state side of the Land and Conservation Fund, which funds the acquisition of parks and green spaces across the country.[8] An industry-led coalition called the Consumer Alliance for Energy Security applauded passage of the bill and claimed that they “played a prominent role” in winning its passage.

Allegations of fraudulent underpayment of royalties by oil and gas companies

POGO [government respecting unionization should be neutral] and whistleblowers file suit against oil companies in mid-nineties During the mid-nineties, whistleblowers and the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), a government watchdog group, filed suit against sixteen oil companies for failing to pay their required royalties. POGO’s suit was filed under the False Claims Act (FCA), which provides citizens the power to sue on behalf of the federal government for fraud.

Clinton Interior Dept. error leads to lost revenue for federal government; Bush admin. takes years to fix

In 1998 and 1999, the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service (MMS) under President Clinton issued over 1,000 leases to oil and gas companies which omitted the clause forcing companies to pay royalties if oil prices rose above $34 a barrel and natural gas rose above $4 per thousand cubic feet.[46] The New York Times exposed the problem in a February 14, 2006 article.[47] The Bush administration learned of the mistake, but initially opted not to address it. Interior Secretary Norton stated, “These are binding contracts that the government signed with companies...I don’t think we can change them just because we don’t like them.”[48][49][50]

Royalty-in-Kind (instead of cash payment fill federal reserves) program expands under Bush

Under the Bush administration, the Minerals Management Service (MMS) dramatically expanded its program to take oil and gas royalties-in-kind (RIK), meaning the industry gives the government a portion of the oil and gas it takes from federal lands rather than paying royalties in cash. Much of the oil taken under this program has been used to fill the federal government’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve. A series of pilot programs in the 1990’s were the precursor to this expansion. These pilot programs almost consistently lost money for the government

Bush administration relaxed royalty requirements

In 2004, after oil and gas prices had risen substantially over the previous several years, Interior Secretary Gale Norton offered royalty incentives to shallow-water producers

110th Congress After Democrats took control of Congress following the 2006 congressional elections, the House passed the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007, 264-163.

Ben Lieberman of the Heritage Foundation argued: "Tax hikes on domestic energy also undercut the energy security rationale for the bill. He also described how a requirement to switch over to "politically correct alternative energy sources" would become a burden, as these sources require federal funding to be competitive. He wrote, "Of course, the only reason why a federally mandated Renewable Portfolio Standard is needed in the first place is that that these alternatives are far too expensive to compete otherwise. In effect, Washington is forcing costlier energy options on the public."

All comes down to Money & Government Imposed Restrictions..Tax Them Til They Have To Fail or "Never waste a 'good' crisis"

69 posted on 06/15/2010 7:13:15 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Trivia: American consumers and small businesses spill more than 9 million gallons of gasoline each year. That's the equivalent of an oil supertanker

But Oil Supertankers don't haul gasoline....They only haul Crude Oil as a general rule...

70 posted on 06/15/2010 8:45:50 AM PDT by FDNYRHEROES (In just His first 3 days, the War on Terror became the War on Free Speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Then I guess Watergate was no big deal vis-a-vis Nixon.
71 posted on 06/15/2010 8:55:11 AM PDT by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
Interesting that this video was able to make it out of the facility.

I guess not everybody in the government isn't a coward or a traitor.

72 posted on 06/15/2010 8:56:53 AM PDT by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
I'll say! I wonder if anyone in that room will pull the trigger in getting this out to the MSM.

FoxNews knows about it.

Will they be Obama's lapdog on this issue?

73 posted on 06/15/2010 8:58:12 AM PDT by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: unspun

OBAMA LIED. THE GULF DIED.


74 posted on 06/15/2010 9:03:35 AM PDT by TheRobb7 (BLAMING BUSH NEVER FED A HUNGRY CHILD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRobb7; All

Article “final” is going out to numerous venues.

http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2010/06/video-shows-us-government-well-aware-in.html


75 posted on 06/15/2010 9:21:46 AM PDT by unspun (It's individual, state & national sovereignties, 'stupid' - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker

THey are good people trying to do their jobs, but with no clear cut line of command they are screwed. This is STRAIGHT out of my text book:

“2.2.6 Link Emergency Response to Disaster Recovery and Hazard Mitigation
No clear line separates emergency response and disaster recovery. Some portions of the community will be engaged in emergency response tasks while others conduct recovery tasks. Response planning should be linked to recovery planning, which will speed the process of disaster recovery. It will also ease the integration of hazard mitigation into disaster recovery (Wu and Lindell, 2004). The necessary coordination can be achieved through organizational contacts between officials and personnel responsible for these activities.”
(Perry, Ronald W.. Emergency Planning. John Wiley & Sons, 102006. 56).


76 posted on 06/15/2010 9:27:22 AM PDT by Danae (If Liberals were only moderately insane, they would be tollerable. Alas, such is not the case.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Boucheau

Which actually means this was the plan all along. The SWAT teams were sent to destroy the evidence & whisk whoever they needed to whisk away off the rigs.

The rig was blown to destroy anything else.

There is only one conclusion: this was a domestic, coordinated, long-planned terrorist attack.


77 posted on 06/15/2010 5:03:24 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

I don’t know if I would call it a “terrorist attack” but it is certainly a means to an end.

Of course they rejected the initial recommendations of engineers, of course they rejected help from other nations and companies, and of course they delayed—they needed it to reach shore.

All they need is a tiny bit of doubt in the people, a tiny bit of guilt to forestall resistance to their carbon tax.

They are masters at using our own ethics (guilt) against us. I don’t find it difficult to defend drilling for oil, but many marshmallow sellouts on the right seem to struggle with it now that the “accidental” spill has occurred.

They will use this to their benefit.

It was a 39% premium increase from Blue Cross to usher in socialized medicine and it is oil spill to usher in a carbon tax.


78 posted on 06/15/2010 5:16:03 PM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: unspun
From Steve McIntyre at CLIMATE AUDIT on June 2:

“Did any of you know that the US supposedly has a National Contingency Plan for dealing with very large oil spills? And that EPA has legal responsibility for maintaining readiness for such an eventuality? Who knew? I’ve watched hours of coverage and this hasn’t been mentioned anywhere.”

http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/02/epa-and-the-national-contingency-plan/

79 posted on 06/15/2010 10:04:41 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson