Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama relieved Gen. Stanley McChrystal of commanding forces in Afghanistan.
Wall Street Journal ^ | June 23, 2010

Posted on 06/23/2010 10:31:05 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Obama chooses Gen. David Petraeus to replace Gen. Stanley McChrystal as top Afghan commander, according to the Associated Press.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; mcchrystal; military; muslim; muslimvictory; obama; petraeus; victory4enemy; victory4islam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-222 next last
To: reaganaut1

Obama said “we have an obligation to our troops in harm’s way”...

(not said)...”with that said,..their ROE will be woefully ineffective..”


81 posted on 06/23/2010 10:52:04 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

RE: He’s out of a job as of today. I don’t think it’ll take long at all to process his retirement.


Too bad, McChrystal’s battlefield achievements are too valuable to overlook.

He maintained a very low profile until June 2006, when his forces were responsible for the death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, leader of Al-Qaeda in Iraq. The success of the surge in Iraq are due in part to his hard work.


82 posted on 06/23/2010 10:52:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

Will Harry Reid stand on the floor and declare

THIS WAR IS LOST

like he did before???

BWAHAHAHA


83 posted on 06/23/2010 10:52:37 AM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Not much detail yet but the report is he has been relieved of his command. I suspect the Petraus appointment is a temporary patch to gain some breathing space until SecDef and the White House can properly vet the likely replacements and make a suitable selection.

At this point, what happens to General McCrystal becomes a personnel assignment matter for SecDef. Just what do you do with a relieved 4 star Army general who no longer enjoys the CIC’s confidence?

In normal times, the usal course is to request retirement. But these are not normal times and McCrystal is still a top expert in unconventional warfare/SpecOps.


84 posted on 06/23/2010 10:52:42 AM PDT by Captain Rhino (“Si vis pacem, para bellum” - if you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

85 posted on 06/23/2010 10:52:50 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Watching the MSM with Obama is like watching Joslyn James with Tiger Woods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

...ok, so...Gen. David Petraeus...hmmm...mentioned as a Republican nominee for president in 2012...if so, will Obama give Petraeus the tools to win the war or will he Vietnam-him?

I think the latter...I hope Gen. David Petraeus knows this.

This proves McChrystal must have put in his resignation and Obama is SAYING he fired him. No way Obama fired him.


86 posted on 06/23/2010 10:53:10 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

Yea. Crowded under that bus.


87 posted on 06/23/2010 10:53:25 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade
Patreaus is awesome. If he calls for an Afghan surge they will go ballistic.

Sounds like a game plan. McChrystal warned he would resign in September of 09 if his requested troop increase were not fulfilled. Obama slow leaked his request for months and left it short by at least 20 grand. Patreaus can start by dictating to Obama to change his idiotic ROE.

88 posted on 06/23/2010 10:53:37 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The general knew his comments would have this effect.

Pretty scary, as it tells me he sees major problems with this administration, and saw no other way to get the word out.

89 posted on 06/23/2010 10:53:52 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland ("And for that matter what do we REALLY know about HereInTheHeartland?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Don’t the “V’s” eat flies?


90 posted on 06/23/2010 10:54:00 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

hey Obama

 

BITE ME

91 posted on 06/23/2010 10:54:03 AM PDT by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

Many enlistees despise this guy Obama, for obvious reason. Bob


92 posted on 06/23/2010 10:54:29 AM PDT by alstewartfan (Two broken Tigers on fire in the night, Flicker their souls to the wind." Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Regarding Obama’s speech right now...... I I I I I I I I I, MY MY MY MY MY MY MY...... Aaaaargh!


93 posted on 06/23/2010 10:54:36 AM PDT by Paperdoll ( On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AUJenn
I’m still baffled as to why anyone would agree to give an interview to Rolling Stone. Nothing good can come from that (unless you are Obama).

Maybe he just wanted an image enhancement?


94 posted on 06/23/2010 10:55:02 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 516 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

No, he could have reprimanded him and sent him back to Afghanistan. Not everything is a firing offense, and Obama just got through telling us what a great job McChrystal was doing.


95 posted on 06/23/2010 10:55:10 AM PDT by americanophile (November can't come fast enough....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Poki-stan.... 0bobngo is setting a new record for how many times he can say Poki-stan


96 posted on 06/23/2010 10:55:45 AM PDT by dennisw (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid - Gen Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

I hope Pelosi and Reid just sh*t their pants!!

After all these years of hatred they spewed about ‘bush’s failed policies’...

BWAHAHAHAHA


97 posted on 06/23/2010 10:56:17 AM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

Obama is already clearing the deck for 2012. Don’t kid yourself on this move.


98 posted on 06/23/2010 10:56:21 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
This is Google's cache of http://pol.moveon.org/petraeus.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 18, 2010 23:00:49 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Text-only version
These search terms are highlighted: moveon petraeus  

General Petraeus or General Betray Us?


View the ad (PDF)

Cooking the books for the White House

(Click here for the thinking behind the ad)

General Petraeus is a military man constantly at war with the facts. In 2004, just before the election, he said there was “tangible progress“ in Iraq and that “Iraqi leaders are stepping forward.”
Washington Post, “Battling for Iraq,” by David H. Petraeus.  9/26/04 (see below)

And last week Petraeus, the architect of the escalation of troops in Iraq , said ”We say we have achieved progress, and we are obviously going to do everything we can to build on that progress.”
The Australian, “Surge Working: Top US General,” by Dennis Shanahan.  8/31/07

Every independent report on the ground situation in Iraq shows that the surge strategy has failed.
GAO report, 9/4/07
NIE report, 8/23/07
Jones report, CSIS, 9/6/07
Independent AP investigation, 9/1/07
Independent L.A. Times investigation, 9/1/07

Yet the General claims a reduction in violence. That’s because, according to the New York Times, the Pentagon has adopted a bizarre formula for keeping tabs on violence. For example, deaths by car bombs don’t count.
 “Time to Take a Stand,” by Paul Krugman.  9/7/07    

The Washington Post reported that assassinations only count if you're shot in the back of the head -- not the front.
“Experts Doubt Drop in Violence in Iraq,” by Karen DeYoung. 9/6/07 l

According to news reports, there have been more civilian deaths and more American soldier deaths in the past three months than in any other summer we’ve been there.
The Associated Press, “Violence Appears to Be Shifting from Baghdad.” 8/25/07
National Public Radio, “Statistics the Weapon of Choice in Surge Debate,” by Guy Raz.  9/6/07
Associated Press, “Key Figures About Iraq Since the War Began in 2003.”  9/5/07

We'll hear of neighborhoods where violence has decreased. But we won't hear that those neighborhoods have been ethnically cleansed.
Newsweek, “Baghdad’s New Owners,” by Babak Dehghanpisheh and Larry Kaplow, 9/10/07
Ibid from the AP, “Violence Appears to be Shifting From Baghdad”
McClatchy, “Despite Violence Drop, Officers See Bleak Future for Iraq,” by Leila Fadel. 8/15/07
The New York Times, “More Iraqis Said to Flee Since Troop Rise,” by James Glanz and Stephen Farrell. 8/24/07
Most importantly, General Petraeus will not admit what everyone knows; Iraq is mired in an unwinnable religious civil war.
We may hear of a plan to withdraw a few thousand American troops.
The New York Times, “Petraeus, Seeing Gains in Iraq as Fragile, is Wary of Cuts,” by David Sanger and David Cloud, 9/7/07
The Washington Post, “Petraeus Open to Pullout of One Brigade,” by Robin Wright and Jonathan Weisman.  9/7/07.

But we won’t hear what Americans are desperate to hear: a timetable for withdrawing all our troops. General Petraeus has actually said American troops will need to stay in Iraq for as long as ten years.
The Hill, “Rep. Schakowsky: Petraeus hints at decade-long Iraq presence,” by Patrick FitzGerald.  8/10/07
Today before Congress and before the American people, General Petraeus is likely to become General Betray Us.

 

The Washington Post, 9/26/04
Battling for Iraq

BYLINE: David H. Petraeus

SECTION: Editorial; B07

LENGTH: 1239 words

DATELINE: BAGHDAD
Helping organize, train and equip nearly a quarter-million of Iraq's security forces is a daunting task. Doing so in the middle of a tough insurgency increases the challenge enormously, making the mission akin to repairing an aircraft while in flight -- and while being shot at. Now, however, 18 months after entering Iraq, I see tangible progress. Iraqi security elements are being rebuilt from the ground up.
The institutions that oversee them are being reestablished from the top down. And Iraqi leaders are stepping forward, leading their country and their security forces courageously in the face of an enemy that has shown a willingness to do anything to disrupt the establishment of the new Iraq.
In recent months, I have observed thousands of Iraqis in training and then watched as they have conducted numerous operations. Although there have been reverses -- not to mention horrific terrorist attacks -- there has been progress in the effort to enable Iraqis to shoulder more of the load for their own security, something they are keen to do. The future undoubtedly will be full of difficulties, especially in places such as Fallujah. We must expect setbacks and recognize that not every soldier or policeman we help train will be equal to the challenges ahead.
Nonetheless, there are reasons for optimism. Today approximately 164,000 Iraqi police and soldiers (of which about 100,000 are trained and equipped) and an additional 74,000 facility protection forces are performing a wide variety of security missions. Equipment is being delivered. Training is on track and increasing in capacity. Infrastructure is being repaired. Command and control structures and institutions are being reestablished.
Most important, Iraqi security forces are in the fight -- so much so that they are suffering substantial casualties as they take on more and more of the burdens to achieve security in their country. Since Jan. 1 more than 700 Iraqi security force members have been killed, and hundreds of Iraqis seeking to volunteer for the police and military have been killed as well.
Six battalions of the Iraqi regular army and the Iraqi Intervention Force are now conducting operations. Two of these battalions, along with the Iraqi commando battalion, the counterterrorist force, two Iraqi National Guard battalions and thousands of policemen recently contributed to successful operations in Najaf. Their readiness to enter and clear the Imam Ali shrine was undoubtedly a key factor in enabling Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani to persuade members of the Mahdi militia to lay down their arms and leave the shrine.
In another highly successful operation several days ago, the Iraqi counterterrorist force conducted early-morning raids in Najaf that resulted in the capture of several senior lieutenants and 40 other members of that militia, and the seizure of enough weapons to fill nearly four 71/2-ton dump trucks.
Within the next 60 days, six more regular army and six additional Intervention Force battalions will become operational. Nine more regular army battalions will complete training in January, in time to help with security missions during the Iraqi elections at the end of that month.
Iraqi National Guard battalions have also been active in recent months. Some 40 of the 45 existing battalions -- generally all except those in the Fallujah-Ramadi area -- are conducting operations on a daily basis, most alongside coalition forces, but many independently. Progress has also been made in police training. In the past week alone, some 1,100 graduated from the basic policing course and five specialty courses. By early spring, nine academies in Iraq and one in Jordan will be graduating a total of 5,000 police each month from the eight-week course, which stresses patrolling and investigative skills, substantive and procedural legal knowledge, and proper use of force and weaponry, as well as pride in the profession and adherence to the police code of conduct.
Iraq's borders are long, stretching more than 2,200 miles. Reducing the flow of extremists and their resources across the borders is critical to success in the counterinsurgency. As a result, with support from the Department of Homeland Security, specialized training for Iraq's border enforcement elements began earlier this month in Jordan.
Regional academies in Iraq have begun training as well, and more will come online soon. In the months ahead, the 16,000-strong border force will expand to 24,000 and then 32,000. In addition, these forces will be provided with modern technology, including vehicle X-ray machines, explosive-detection devices and ground sensors.
Outfitting hundreds of thousands of new Iraqi security forces is difficult and complex, and many of the units are not yet fully equipped. But equipment has begun flowing. Since July 1, for example, more than 39,000 weapons and 22 million rounds of ammunition have been delivered to Iraqi forces, in addition to 42,000 sets of body armor, 4,400 vehicles, 16,000 radios and more than 235,000 uniforms.
Considerable progress is also being made in the reconstruction and refurbishing of infrastructure for Iraq's security forces. Some $1 billion in construction to support this effort has been completed or is underway, and five Iraqi bases are already occupied by entire infantry brigades.
Numbers alone cannot convey the full story. The human dimension of this effort is crucial. The enemies of Iraq recognize how much is at stake as Iraq reestablishes its security forces. Insurgents and foreign fighters continue to mount barbaric attacks against police stations, recruiting centers and military installations, even though the vast majority of the population deplores such attacks. Yet despite the sensational attacks, there is no shortage of qualified recruits volunteering to join Iraqi security forces. In the past couple of months, more than 7,500 Iraqi men have signed up for the army and are preparing to report for basic training to fill out the final nine battalions of the Iraqi regular army. Some 3,500 new police recruits just reported for training in various locations. And two days after the recent bombing on a street outside a police recruiting location in Baghdad, hundreds of Iraqis were once again lined up inside the force protection walls at another location -- where they were greeted by interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi.
I meet with Iraqi security force leaders every day. Though some have given in to acts of intimidation, many are displaying courage and resilience in the face of repeated threats and attacks on them, their families and their comrades. I have seen their determination and their desire to assume the full burden of security tasks for Iraq.
There will be more tough times, frustration and disappointment along the way. It is likely that insurgent attacks will escalate as Iraq's elections approach. Iraq's security forces are, however, developing steadily and they are in the fight. Momentum has gathered in recent months. With strong Iraqi leaders out front and with continued coalition -- and now NATO -- support, this trend will continue. It will not be easy, but few worthwhile things are.
The writer, an Army lieutenant general, commands the Multinational Security Transition Command in Iraq. He previously commanded the 101st Airborne Division, which was deployed in Iraq from March 2003 until February 2004.

 


99 posted on 06/23/2010 10:56:51 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Watching the MSM with Obama is like watching Joslyn James with Tiger Woods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

“Was McChrystal simply relieved of command or has he retired from the military?”

I want to know that, too, as I am reading “he was fired” in some accounts. Would this mean dishonorable discharge, and he won’t get his pension? Just curious. Also, all the Generals and officers should resign...sort of, “what if they gave a war and nobody came.” When I read on some blogs that a revolution is coming, it worries me that there might be a military coup coming with it.


100 posted on 06/23/2010 10:58:05 AM PDT by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson